Sponsored

Wheel and Fitment Search

USMCtoARMY

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2017
Threads
25
Messages
788
Reaction score
297
Location
Lake Stevens, WA
Vehicle(s)
2016 Mustang V6 MT
NOT my car. Was posted lasted month by another member in the Aggressive Fitment Thread. I want these exact wheels. They are Kai Reps. Aodhan, ESR, Vordhoven make this rep wheel. I just didn't think a 19x10.5 +22 square would fit so perfectly as these photos depict. Anyone have something similar? What is your suspension setup/ specs and what it took to get them sit flush? Camber? Would a 285 35 19 fitment work (the OP is running 275 and I can clearly see the stretch). I just want this wheel and this fitment. It's the exact look I have wanted since I have owned my car. Anyone help or thoughts would be appreciated.
3174ADF1-852C-4EF1-B545-8A53510512EC.jpeg
18232D55-E929-4D2F-98EA-0232F08B1AE2.jpeg
Sponsored

 

ModularKid21

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2018
Threads
19
Messages
929
Reaction score
778
Location
Maryland
Vehicle(s)
ā€˜15 GT
Vehicle Showcase
1
You need a good amount of camber to get a 10.5 +22 to fit. Most aren’t into the whole ā€œstance/tuckedā€ mustang thing, so your replies will probably be slim. Also depends on what tires you use. Not just the size, but the characteristics of the tires. The actual Work’s come in 10.5 +30 I believe. I’ve seen a few pics of 10.5 +30 wheels with firehawk tires and the fit in the rear was good. I had 10.5 +30 gt350 wheels (with the factory 295/35 MPSS) and they poked in the rear. Mainly because of the large wheel protector built into the tires, and that was with -2.2* camber. Pics below
F4407284-4685-4938-88FB-CE5493CE5118.webp
35C0FC7A-08AE-4C66-9335-580BA6435BF7.webp
0D7F32B7-C5F0-45CD-90B7-96A30C6753D0.webp
70FAAF1D-4E39-4757-A9D5-209CED64DFF4.webp
 
OP
OP
USMCtoARMY

USMCtoARMY

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2017
Threads
25
Messages
788
Reaction score
297
Location
Lake Stevens, WA
Vehicle(s)
2016 Mustang V6 MT
I'm actually okay with some poke. But the car above is definitely on coilovers.
 

ModularKid21

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2018
Threads
19
Messages
929
Reaction score
778
Location
Maryland
Vehicle(s)
ā€˜15 GT
Vehicle Showcase
1
I’d just go with a 10.5 with an offset somewhere between 20-30. Lower the car to the ride height you’re looking for, then have e camber adjusted to get the fitment you want. With how low that car is, they already had a ton of negative camber so there probably wasn’t much adjustment made
 
OP
OP
USMCtoARMY

USMCtoARMY

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2017
Threads
25
Messages
788
Reaction score
297
Location
Lake Stevens, WA
Vehicle(s)
2016 Mustang V6 MT
I’d just go with a 10.5 with an offset somewhere between 20-30. Lower the car to the ride height you’re looking for, then have e camber adjusted to get the fitment you want. With how low that car is, they already had a ton of negative camber so there probably wasn’t much adjustment made
I am lowered 1-1.4 inches on the current springs I have. I also have all the steeda adjustable suspension parts to include the steeda front control arms with bumpsteer kit and some camber bolts for the min drop I have. I was debating on going lower, but if I pull the trigger on these rims I would wait and see how the fitment is to determine if it is needed.
Sponsored

 
 








Top