Sponsored
3beeps
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 13, 2016
- Threads
- 37
- Messages
- 911
- Reaction score
- 408
- Location
- Florida
- Website
- www.instagram.com
- Vehicle(s)
- '17 GT
Your numbers are solid. A lot of people post STD dyno numbers so their numbers look higher. 430whp SAE on 93 octane is quite solid from what I've seen. I made 438whp/395wtq SAE with the same mods as you on E85.
RoadCone
Well-Known Member
Thank you.... it's reassuring. I'm new to the coyote world.
I probably gave up a few ponies going with a H-Pipe also...
Long gone are the days of the Foxbody! I remember what it took to get there back in the day. Think I made 494rwhp with a modified motor and S-trim:frusty:
NEED2015GT
Well-Known Member
Thanks evil 5.0! You have been more help than beefcake has been.
Sponsored
mustang_guy
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 29, 2015
- Threads
- 12
- Messages
- 5,721
- Reaction score
- 1,324
- Location
- United States
- Vehicle(s)
- it has an engine!
Thats why you either turbocharged the 5.0 or swapped to a 351w, stroked the piss out of it (408 or 427)and nitrous blasted it. Some stroked the hell out of the 5.0 too and also sprayed.
1badrz28
Well-Known Member
PMAS off eBay $200.00
OBX 1 7/8th headers w/ off road $480.00.
I'll take those bargain basement priced gains, when I add a tune and e85 this spring.
Thanks for sharing your numbers.
OBX 1 7/8th headers w/ off road $480.00.
I'll take those bargain basement priced gains, when I add a tune and e85 this spring.
Thanks for sharing your numbers.
RoadCone
Well-Known Member
He is a very busy man!! He just wanted the best for his customers. He honestly didn't know which intake to recommend to his customers. Beefcake stated before and after this, they are both close and it comes down to preference.
OP
OP
- Thread starter
- #295
working on overlaying graphs, with numbers at 3 different rpm ranges. 3000, 4200, and 7000 rpms.
should have them ready tomorrow. trying to get info as accurate as possible before just throwing it out there.
give you guys something to look at and compare.
should have them ready tomorrow. trying to get info as accurate as possible before just throwing it out there.
give you guys something to look at and compare.
Sponsored
NEED2015GT
Well-Known Member
I understand but he should have just waited till he had all this information for us, before starting the thread. Sorry And I know I'm being a ass. Thanks for the help that you have giving. :cheers:
OP
OP
- Thread starter
- #297
it would be nice to pull a 9 to 5er and be done for the day with all kinds of spare time.
but, since i'm answer phones, emails, tech questions, fb messages, and texts starting about 7am, to 11pm 7 days a week.
time is def limited. plus the fact that lund was looking at the logs, then we were adding headers, to the car.
moving as quick as we can on our time / dime, to try to get info out there.
appreciate the patience for those that have it
dev1360
Well-Known Member
Maybe I'm crazy, but looking closely at the curves, the PMAS looks to make more torque at 2,500-3,000-3,500 and up, building to a higher peak when compared to the JLT. HP also seems to be a touch more throughout the bottom half of the curve.
I'm really curious to see them overlaid instead of counting dots while zoomed in lol
I'm really curious to see them overlaid instead of counting dots while zoomed in lol
OP
OP
- Thread starter
- #300
not what we saw, almost identical up to 6500.
3 pulls each, each with a lower torque hp in a similar range.
up top, timing was much more consistent, and again, we saw about 4 more hp up top with the pmas, very close other than that,
again, pick your poison imo, our favorite 2 intakes
Sponsored