Exactly, but stay away from anything with a 3.5" or bigger tube as it is too big for the stock turbo.Whichever looks cooler to you
Dammit. I bought a 3.5" CAI, but havn't installed it yet. Would it be feasible to just use a gasket to step it down to 3"?Exactly, but stay away from anything with a 3.5" or bigger tube as it is too big for the stock turbo.
Go with something 3" and looks good to you. I personally recommend Full-Race as they use 3" tubing and include a heatshield. They point the filter at the factory grill inlet as well.
Which one did you get?Dammit. I bought a 3.5" CAI, but havn't installed it yet. Would it be feasible to just use a gasket to step it down to 3"?
MMR.Which one did you get?
Mine is 3.5 inch and i do think it effects my torque down low sometimes but it still helps up top, and i recall when I made the switch it made my acceleration feel a bit "smoother"MMR.
If a company sees a gain of 1 whp over 50 independent RPM's on the dyno sheet, they can say that their product gained +50whp.I've read a lot of the CAI posts from both consumers and sellers regarding the benefits of CAI for the ecoboost Mustang. Independent tests of the JLT and AirRaid systems, for example, have shown decent benefits. Then I read that CAI systems for the ecoboost are gimmics, don't really give you any REAL benefits, are a waste of money, etc. Some of these negative claims are from contributors I have grown to respect through reading the forums. Now I'm confused. Are you saying that the posted dyno results are not really valid or are you saying that the dyno results are valid and CAIs are still not worth the cost?