Sponsored

Standard vs. Staggered Wheels

LSchicago

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 11, 2018
Threads
93
Messages
2,914
Reaction score
2,544
Location
Illinois
First Name
Lloyd
Vehicle(s)
2018 Mustang GT/A 301A 5.0
Check out this 2018 Mustang GT running a staggered setup, measuring 20x10 275/35/20 Front and 20x11 305/35/20 Rear.
Client loves the flush fitment and ride quality.

Click Below
logo.webp


47411992_142405876744370_935920881228816310_n.jpg?_nc_ht=scontent-sjc3-1.cdninstagram.jpg
Nice, but I like my SP2's better.
48384665_10155614645281580_383162046885134336_n.jpg
Sponsored

 

jasonstang

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2015
Threads
23
Messages
5,571
Reaction score
1,307
Location
Denver, CO
Vehicle(s)
2017 GB GT/CS 6MT
Unless you are running skinny front tires with massive rear tires, you won't see too much grip difference front to back. Most of the time, tire width difference front to back has very little to do with handling. Handling is more affect by the suspension setup.
Now having more meat on the back will allow you to apply power sooner thus better handling.
 

jasonstang

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2015
Threads
23
Messages
5,571
Reaction score
1,307
Location
Denver, CO
Vehicle(s)
2017 GB GT/CS 6MT
Just keep in mind that the contact patch of a 285 and a 325 at the same pressure is the same, just different shape (and the narrower tire has a longer contact patch which is better for straight line traction). That's one thing people forget when they go to wide tires.
That is not right. If narrower tires have better straight line traction at the same pressure than wider tires, why would any super cars use wide tires?
I think you are looking at it wrong. Yes, the wider the tires, the front to back contact patch length is shorter but the side to side width is wider. So the grip is redistributed to a wider patch.
 

Velgen

Well-Known Member
Diamond Sponsor
Joined
Oct 21, 2014
Threads
392
Messages
2,668
Reaction score
1,518
Location
Florida
Vehicle(s)
2017 Mustang GT
It all depends on what look you're trying to accomplish. ALot of people run staggered sets. Whats good about a square set is that you can rotate them unlike a staggered set
 

CEHollier

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 6, 2015
Threads
81
Messages
1,570
Reaction score
707
Location
Prairieville, La.
First Name
Charles
Vehicle(s)
2015 GT Premium Magnetic
Vehicle Showcase
1

Sponsored

BmacIL

Enginerd
Joined
Sep 21, 2014
Threads
69
Messages
14,989
Reaction score
8,907
Location
Naperville, IL
Vehicle(s)
2015 Guard GT Base, M/T
Vehicle Showcase
1
That is not right. If narrower tires have better straight line traction at the same pressure than wider tires, why would any super cars use wide tires?
I think you are looking at it wrong. Yes, the wider the tires, the front to back contact patch length is shorter but the side to side width is wider. So the grip is redistributed to a wider patch.
Mostly because wider tires, in general, have higher load capacity, less camber sensitivity, and because of the load capacity, can be safely used at lower pressures, increasing the contact patch area. A wider contact patch produces more lateral grip, a usual important attribute of a supercar.

A longer contact patch absolutely has more contact friction in the direction perpendicular to the tire rotation axis. A wider patch has more friction in the direction parallel to the rotation axis. This is physics and racecar vehicle dynamics stuff...not making stuff up.
 

NorthernMuscle

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 11, 2017
Threads
4
Messages
47
Reaction score
29
Location
Ontario
Vehicle(s)
2015 GT
What are those offsets?
Yeah, I'm curious about that offset also... I love that I went with 20" wheels this time (for the looks), and IMO Tech7's are a great value, but don't love how the setup I chose have the fronts sitting in about 1/4" further than I'd like. Doesn't sound like much to some, but it makes a big difference to looks.

275/35 SuperSports on 20x9.5” in front
295/35 SuperSports on 20x10.5” in rear
I was a bit concerned that 20" would look "too much" for my liking, but after comparing weights to their 19" counterparts, and adding/removing both from my cart about 10x, I'm happy with them.
IMHO, if you're prioritizing looks at all, go 20". I had the car for a year with the GTPP wheels, 1" spacers all around, and lowered, which still looks pretty decent compared to stock. When I put these wheels on, I got about 10x more comments about the car in general...

*I should also mention, that at 275/295/35, I went with a little taller sidewall than some others choose to do, so the wheel wells would be filled more, and the profile wouldn't be too low, without adding too much to the circumference. These are very usable as a daily driver option.

IMG_1156 copy.jpg
IMG_1157 copy.jpg
IMG_1160 copy.webp
IMG_1162 copy.webp
 

jasonstang

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2015
Threads
23
Messages
5,571
Reaction score
1,307
Location
Denver, CO
Vehicle(s)
2017 GB GT/CS 6MT
Mostly because wider tires, in general, have higher load capacity, less camber sensitivity, and because of the load capacity, can be safely used at lower pressures, increasing the contact patch area. A wider contact patch produces more lateral grip, a usual important attribute of a supercar.

A longer contact patch absolutely has more contact friction in the direction perpendicular to the tire rotation axis. A wider patch has more friction in the direction parallel to the rotation axis. This is physics and racecar vehicle dynamics stuff...not making stuff up.
I don't think that is right that a winder tire would have less front to back compare to lateral grip because the contact patch is widened compare to a narrower tire.
I believe the shape of contact patch has nothing to do with how much force each axis can handle. Most often wider tires have higher load level allowing bigger contact patch at the same pressure.
You can test this yourself. Drag something very long and narrow in both axis and you will notice you are using the same amount of force regardless the shape of contact patch.
 

BmacIL

Enginerd
Joined
Sep 21, 2014
Threads
69
Messages
14,989
Reaction score
8,907
Location
Naperville, IL
Vehicle(s)
2015 Guard GT Base, M/T
Vehicle Showcase
1
I don't think that is right that a winder tire would have less front to back compare to lateral grip because the contact patch is widened compare to a narrower tire.
I believe the shape of contact patch has nothing to do with how much force each axis can handle. Most often wider tires have higher load level allowing bigger contact patch at the same pressure.
You can test this yourself. Drag something very long and narrow in both axis and you will notice you are using the same amount of force regardless the shape of contact patch.
Not going to keep arguing, as this is long sidetracked from the thread topic. That isn't correct, and tire friction doesn't work like that for a multitude of reasons. I'd be more than happy to discuss over PM though :).
 

michael5.0

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2023
Threads
10
Messages
65
Reaction score
87
Location
California
First Name
Michael
Vehicle(s)
2019 Ford Mustang GT Premium
Yeah, I'm curious about that offset also... I love that I went with 20" wheels this time (for the looks), and IMO Tech7's are a great value, but don't love how the setup I chose have the fronts sitting in about 1/4" further than I'd like. Doesn't sound like much to some, but it makes a big difference to looks.

275/35 SuperSports on 20x9.5” in front
295/35 SuperSports on 20x10.5” in rear
I was a bit concerned that 20" would look "too much" for my liking, but after comparing weights to their 19" counterparts, and adding/removing both from my cart about 10x, I'm happy with them.
IMHO, if you're prioritizing looks at all, go 20". I had the car for a year with the GTPP wheels, 1" spacers all around, and lowered, which still looks pretty decent compared to stock. When I put these wheels on, I got about 10x more comments about the car in general...

*I should also mention, that at 275/295/35, I went with a little taller sidewall than some others choose to do, so the wheel wells would be filled more, and the profile wouldn't be too low, without adding too much to the circumference. These are very usable as a daily driver option.

IMG_1156 copy.jpg
IMG_1157 copy.jpg
IMG_1160 copy.jpg
IMG_1162 copy.jpg
Stock suspension in these pics? Looks real good
 

NorthernMuscle

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 11, 2017
Threads
4
Messages
47
Reaction score
29
Location
Ontario
Vehicle(s)
2015 GT
 








Top