Science is now cancelled? [USERS NOW BANNED FOR POLITICS]

[K4fxd]

The vaccine makes an immunity system response so it can be stronger and better to react ...

Supposedly but it seems this jab is not a vaccine as we are being told it's effectiveness wanes after 6 months.

Recovered people without the jab are protected at 8 months and counting

Sponsored

 

[MaskedRacerX]

Specifically what "ideas coming from authorities" ... and exactly what "authorities" are you referring to?

 

[GT Pony]

Supposedly but it seems this jab is not a vaccine as we are being told it's effectiveness wanes after 6 months.

You are so stuck on what you think if should be vs what it is. And just because the effectiveness wanes and a booster is needed for some people doesn't mean it's bad and should not be used. That's just plain flawed logic if that's your premise. It's not the first vaccine that required more than one shot or a booster at some point.

Read this: https://www.passporthealthusa.com/2016/06/why-boosters-are-important/


What Vaccines Require Boosters?

Other vaccines may need a booster more often, such as the annual dose for the flu.

Travel Vaccinations that Require Boosters:

• Anthrax
• Hepatitis A
• Hepatitis B
• Hepatitis A & B
• Japanese Encephalitis
• Meningitis
• Polio (for some individuals)
• Rabies (pre- and post-exposure)
• Typhoid
• Yellow Fever

Routine Vaccinations that Require Boosters:

• Measles, Mumps, Rubella
• Chickenpox
• HPV
• Tetanus, Diphtheria and Pertussis
• Influenza

Recovered people without the jab are protected at 8 months and counting

So? Does that mean people should forget the vaccine and just take a chance on their immune system when they could instead boost their immune system above where it would be without a vaccination? More flawed logic. Or should they go look for that low dose live virus Covid nose spray and build up their immune system that way?

 

[Burkey]

Supposedly but it seems this jab is not a vaccine as we are being told it's effectiveness wanes after 6 months.

Recovered people without the jab are protected at 8 months and counting

You meant to say “most” people without the jab are protected at 8 months and counting.
That‘s fantastic, unless you’re one of the ones who isn’t.
Do you happen to know if YOUR immune response will be sufficient or are you just guessing because you’re the same as “most” people?

 

[GT Pony]

That must be the "long term" side effects that the antivaxxers keep talking about.

 

[K4fxd]

You meant to say “most” people without the jab are protected at 8 months and counting.

That is correct, so if the jab was creating a proper immune response it would also be giving protection at 8 months and counting.

 

[GT Pony]

That is correct, so if the jab was creating a proper immune response it would also be giving protection at 8 months and counting.

You'll never get it ...

 

[Burkey]

That is correct, so if the jab was creating a proper immune response it would also be giving protection at 8 months and counting.

Good way of answering whilst avoiding the question that was asked.

 

[Burkey]

You'll never get it ...

I’m convinced that he’s impervious to logic and reason.

 

[GT Pony]

I’m convinced that he’s impervious to logic and reason.

And the logic required isn't anything high level ... not even close. An antivaxxer just like a Flat Earther is indeed immune to logic. Wonder if they have been taking an antivaxxer vaccine that builds the anitlogic bodies.

 

[K4fxd]

Do you happen to know if YOUR immune response will be sufficient

Yes, since I have had and recovered from covid.

 

[GT Pony]

Yes, since I have had and recovered from covid.

LoL ... so those experts in the Israel studies and others who recommend a booster for people who have had Covid must be blowing smoke, and just in on the big "money grab".

 

[K4fxd]

Logic;
If A+B=C then C-B=A

You two are just pushers of the jab, needed or not.

I am fine with my decision and I have explained it well. Yet you two twist it into a cats cradle.

Open your minds and see the folly of your arguments.

 

[GT Pony]

Logic;
If A+B=C then C-B=A

You two are just pushers of the jab, needed or not.

I am fine with my decision and I have explained it well. Yet you two twist it into a cats cradle.

Open your minds and see the folly of your arguments.

No, we are believes in science ... not nutjob information sources. Science doesn't exist in an antivaxxer's world. Arguments for the vaccine are 100s of times more logical than not. Your formulas never add up ... not even 1 + 1 = 2. Yours is more like 1 + 1 = 0.

Like said before, nobody gives a crap what you've decided to do, but when you bad mouth the vaccine (with sketchy logic) which can give someone's immune system a better chance of fighting an infection (just like yours from having Covid), then is really looks like an antivaxxer dichotomy at play. Really doesn't make sense. I'm sure if you never had Covid you'd still push hard as an antivaxxer because you just believe the natural immune system just doesn't need any help with this nasty virus. That obviously hasn't worked out for multi-millions of times so far.

You come across as It's OK for you to have a stronger immune system, but not others if the only way they want to get it is by a vaccination ... not by getting Covid like you. Of course, if they believe that's the best route to go, then go for it but don't cry about any ramifications. Thankfully more people can see through the antivaxxer mentality and misinformation than not.

 

[Burkey]

Yes, since I have had and recovered from covid.

So if/when that immunity wanes, you’ll just go get infected again? How will you know that it’s waned? Once you become ill again?

Sponsored