I'm not so sure, although it's completely a matter of personal preference - would have to see in the metal I think. Gloss black would match the wheels, decklid etc. I recall there was a special edition (Apollo Edition or something) that had gloss black skirts and grille, which looked OK. Also looks better (than grey plastic) on current Mondeo etc.
if you go gloss black, the splitter, inside of of front lights and grille, side skirts all will need to go gloss to match. If you do them all, it'll look fine - I'd just add my 2 cents that Satin or Matte black would look >WAY< better than gloss on them elements.
You make a good point. Either way it will be getting some treatment as it looks cheap standard. I have a long time to make a decision :lol:
I fully agree, mine are being vinyl wrapped, they don't look too bad in the flesh, but, still a bit on the plastic side.
Even better just remove remove them and spray with black plastidip so easy and cost ÂŁ10 and is very tough. Did my 911 splitter every 12 months kept it deep black no faded grey and looking new.
Such a clean look and the clear lights look better than red lights for sure on silver cars.New take off
I've got the Anchor Room 'light' tint for the reverse/fog light sitting in the garage. However, I've held off fitting it as I'm not sure on legally/liability/insurance. Anyone know where we'd stand on this issue?
I don't understand why the reflectors are amber. Look at reason for rejection point c. http://www.motuk.co.uk/manual_150.htm
Insurance is fine as it's theoretically a reversible change so doesn't need to be disclosed to them (You can reverse tints/wraps etc).
Think the reflectors are the 3 red ones along the back. No clue what the orange ones are, definitely resemble reflectors but why they're orange/amber I haven't got a clue.
Ah yes, good point
