1crazymach
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 6, 2015
- Threads
- 11
- Messages
- 799
- Reaction score
- 363
- Location
- Modesto Ca
- First Name
- Simon
- Vehicle(s)
- 2020 Race Red GT 500
^this would be correct
Sponsored
Now I got'cha Jaime! Thanks for the explanation. That makes more sense to me now since you put that way.No, he's saying to do what Roush does and claim crank hp the his Whipple is making 825 crank hp.
Example my Whipple kit was advertised 670 rwhp
That converts to 788 crank hp (what Roush uses)
I'm making 765 rwhp with long tubes WITH cats, Whipple tune with their 72# injectors. So I should be saying I'm making 900 crank hp compared to Roush 670 crank hp.

*****Now you guys are going to make me buy a S550 after I pay my truck off!
lol
That is very true. I agree all dynos are different and I guess it depends how calibrated there are, as to being how accurate they are.Yeah, I just noticed recently that Whipple is advertising crank HP now too. It's part marketing that companies do this but also all dynos being different. Mustang dynos are usually heart breakers.
We changed it because some were thinking we were comparable to the Roush kit but we make more RWHP then they do rated flywheel so we adapted. DJ's are very consistent, I don't know why Mustang dyno's are always so low, its 10-12% consistently. Then wheels/gears, gear ratio, etc all can vary RWHP so flywheel is best for advertising.Yeah, I just noticed recently that Whipple is advertising crank HP now too. It's part marketing that companies do this but also all dynos being different. Mustang dynos are usually heart breakers.
With all of these kits, I would recommend upgrading the injectors when buying the kit. My 58lb injectors that came with the whipple kit were running out of fuel above 7400.