Sponsored

President Trump has an easy win in 2020

Status
Not open for further replies.

lacanteen

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 18, 2019
Threads
36
Messages
1,621
Reaction score
14,525
Location
Louisiana: Cajun Country
First Name
George
Vehicle(s)
2022 EB premium vert, 2013 Escape, 2017 F150 SC5.0

Caballus

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2016
Threads
43
Messages
3,651
Reaction score
2,094
Location
Europe
Vehicle(s)
GT350
Maybe we should check the "fact checkers".

The VA Mission Act actually replaced The Veterans Choice Bill expanding full access to healthcare outside the VA eliminating many of the shortfall waiting periods of the previous bill. It also expanded caregiver assistance to veterans of all era's.

https://www.military.com/daily-news...5-billion-bill-replace-va-choice-program.html
Veteran's Choice
At Tuesday's coronavirus briefing, Trump repeated his false claim that his administration passed the Veteran's Choice Act, which provided the Department of Veterans Affairs more resources to improve access for veterans and allow them to seek care from non-VA providers.

"We got Veteran's Choice, nobody thought that would be possible that's been many decades they've been trying to get veterans choice," Trump said.


Trump has also previously claimed the US didn't have any ventilators when he took office or when the coronavirus pandemic hit. However, a spokesperson for the Department of Health and Human Services confirmed to CNN in late June that there had been about 19,000 ventilators in the national stockpile for "many years," including 16,660 ventilators that were ready for immediate use in March 2020; the spokesperson confirmed that none of those 16,660 were purchased by the Trump administration.
Unfortunately, despite being bi-partisan, the Mission Act has done little, if anything, to improve the situation over Veterans Choice. Many of the reasons are stated in the article that was posted to say how great it was--read past the first paragraph. Since that time, there has been little indication of improvement. Put on top of that all of the various policies that keep getting slipped in to increase costs of medical insurance (i.e., Tricare) and restrict veteran/retiree access to base medical facilities, and America gets what amounts to a deliberate erosion of veteran medical benefits--broken promises. The problem is that the average citizen does not have the background (or interest) to recognize that it's happening--smoke, mirrors, politics, and cronyism.
 

Burkey

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2016
Threads
87
Messages
5,543
Reaction score
3,521
Location
Australia
Vehicle(s)
2016 Mustang GT
Vehicle Showcase
1
I think you meant under 4%, as quite clearly shown in your reference material.

It’s an interesting metric.

If we talk about it in terms of deaths per infection (as above) vs deaths per 100,000 we can get very different results.
Let’s roll with the IFR though just to show how spurious it can be.

Country A has a population of 100,000 people. They’re proactive. 100 people become infected, 8 die, but they’ve completely eliminated the virus. They have a final IFR of 8% with 8 deaths in total or 8/100,000.

Country B has a population of 300 million. They’re pretty relaxed about the virus. They don’t do enough to stop it, allowing 70% of the population become infected. They have a final IFR of 5% once it’s all said and done.
1,050,000 people die. 330 (ish) per 100,000
They’ve managed to kill people at more than 40 times the rate of their neighbour.
The IFR looks fantastic compared to their neighbour but somehow they’ve made a complete mess of it.

Death rate per capita is probably a better metric for assessing the outcomes.
Pictured below, from your source, for reference.
99FFB6A8-D438-4372-B9CA-7BEF2A907562.jpeg
23430E0E-EFAE-4A63-9987-6A39FA421935.png
 

Jetnoise

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 27, 2018
Threads
21
Messages
1,373
Reaction score
339
Location
Raleigh NC
Vehicle(s)
2018 GT Premium PP1, 70 Shaker Mach 1 stroker, 1967 F/B 357W, 1968 302 Vert, 4I 85 5.0 B&M Blower

Jetnoise

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 27, 2018
Threads
21
Messages
1,373
Reaction score
339
Location
Raleigh NC
Vehicle(s)
2018 GT Premium PP1, 70 Shaker Mach 1 stroker, 1967 F/B 357W, 1968 302 Vert, 4I 85 5.0 B&M Blower

Sponsored

Jetnoise

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 27, 2018
Threads
21
Messages
1,373
Reaction score
339
Location
Raleigh NC
Vehicle(s)
2018 GT Premium PP1, 70 Shaker Mach 1 stroker, 1967 F/B 357W, 1968 302 Vert, 4I 85 5.0 B&M Blower
I think you meant under 4%, as quite clearly shown in your reference material.

It’s an interesting metric.

If we talk about it in terms of deaths per infection (as above) vs deaths per 100,000 we can get very different results.
Let’s roll with the IFR though just to show how spurious it can be.

Country A has a population of 100,000 people. They’re proactive. 100 people become infected, 8 die, but they’ve completely eliminated the virus. They have a final IFR of 8% with 8 deaths in total or 8/100,000.

Country B has a population of 300 million. They’re pretty relaxed about the virus. They don’t do enough to stop it, allowing 70% of the population become infected. They have a final IFR of 5% once it’s all said and done.
1,050,000 people die. 330 (ish) per 100,000
They’ve managed to kill people at more than 40 times the rate of their neighbour.
The IFR looks fantastic compared to their neighbour but somehow they’ve made a complete mess of it.

Death rate per capita is probably a better metric for assessing the outcomes.
Pictured below, from your source, for reference.
99FFB6A8-D438-4372-B9CA-7BEF2A907562.jpeg
23430E0E-EFAE-4A63-9987-6A39FA421935.png
Is death rate the only metric you focus on?
 

Burkey

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2016
Threads
87
Messages
5,543
Reaction score
3,521
Location
Australia
Vehicle(s)
2016 Mustang GT
Vehicle Showcase
1
Is death rate the only metric you focus on?
No, not at all. There’s plenty of other metrics we could focus on. That’s why in the last paragraph I used italics to highlight the word “probably” and followed it up with “better” to highlight exactly my intention of the statement and it’s relation to the original claim being made.
 

Gregs24

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 31, 2018
Threads
23
Messages
4,532
Reaction score
2,845
Location
Wiltshire UK & Charente FR
First Name
Greg
Vehicle(s)
Mustang V8 GT, Ford Kuga PHEV
Reading these threads, the "non-Trump" supporters, really are kings of the doublespeak.

How many times do we see Fauci wearing a mask?

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/07/24/dr-...-widely-available-until-months-into-2021.html

If that was Trump you'd all be up in arms.
In a socially distanced press conference there is no need to wear a mask. However once mingling with people there is so if standing alone at a lectern it is fine but not if you then move back into a croud.

https://ucsf.app.box.com/s/blvolkp5z0mydzd82rjks4wyleagt036

recent paper confirming the benefit of wearing a mask
 

Jetnoise

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 27, 2018
Threads
21
Messages
1,373
Reaction score
339
Location
Raleigh NC
Vehicle(s)
2018 GT Premium PP1, 70 Shaker Mach 1 stroker, 1967 F/B 357W, 1968 302 Vert, 4I 85 5.0 B&M Blower
No, not at all. There’s plenty of other metrics we could focus on. That’s why in the last paragraph I used italics to highlight the word “probably” and followed it up with “better” to highlight exactly my intention of the statement and it’s relation to the original claim being made.
No, not at all. There’s plenty of other metrics we could focus on. That’s why in the last paragraph I used italics to highlight the word “probably” and followed it up with “better” to highlight exactly my intention of the statement and it’s relation to the original claim being made.
Have a metric for the unknown?
 

Burkey

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2016
Threads
87
Messages
5,543
Reaction score
3,521
Location
Australia
Vehicle(s)
2016 Mustang GT
Vehicle Showcase
1

Sponsored

Burkey

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2016
Threads
87
Messages
5,543
Reaction score
3,521
Location
Australia
Vehicle(s)
2016 Mustang GT
Vehicle Showcase
1
That’s exactly the point
We don’t know, can pretend we do
Luckily, I didn’t suggest we could be sure...
 

TexasMetallic5.0

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2020
Threads
3
Messages
509
Reaction score
689
Location
Texas
Vehicle(s)
2018 GT, 2005 Ram 1500 4x4
Landslide victory.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
 




Top