K4fxd
Well-Known Member
Typical response. One does not need to be an immunologist to have an informed opinionUnless you are an immunologist
Sponsored
Typical response. One does not need to be an immunologist to have an informed opinionUnless you are an immunologist
Then express one. Your opinions are scant regarding any real information and facts. I would certainly not call them informed.Typical response. One does not need to be an immunologist to have an informed opinion
This is the internet. I am King, because I say so.Ironically, I am probably one of the few on here that does,
[The] article provides a review of studies evaluating the role of host (and viral) genetics (including variation in HLA genes) in the immune response to coronaviruses, as well as the clinical outcome of coronavirus‐mediated disease. The initial sections focus on seasonal coronaviruses, SARS‐CoV, and MERS‐CoV. We then examine the state of the knowledge regarding genetic polymorphisms and SARS‐CoV‐2 and COVID‐19. The article concludes by discussing research areas with current knowledge gaps and proposes several avenues for future scientific exploration in order to develop new insights into the immunology of SARS‐CoV‐2.This is the internet. I am King, because I say so.
If you understand so much why not break it down for us smucks.
Dude, you are a cranky bastard, aren't you? Why can't you be bothered to actually read the article? Anyway, here you go...pick it apart...or ignore it. I don't really care at this point.What are the conclusions?
Instead of posting nonsense why not post ONE of the avenues for future scientific exploration
You do if the subject is immunology!Typical response. One does not need to be an immunologist to have an informed opinion
With that logic I can't talk pro baseball without first being a professional baseball player.You do if the subject is immunology!
So they are saying they don't have a clue and are doing research.From a viral and host genetics point of view, there are critical knowledge gaps that direct our research agenda. Examples include the following:
- Understanding the role of ACE2, TMPRSS2, and other specific candidate host genes on COVID‐19 infection, severity, and disease outcome.
- Performing candidate gene, epigenetic, and GWAS studies across different racial and ethnic populations in order to identify genes and haplotypes associated with differential factors of infection and clinical outcome, as well as vaccine response.
- Systems genetic and biology studies to understand differential and interacting genetic effects on disease severity and outcome through the lens of the immune response network theory. 168
- Studies of any differential effect of viral mutations and recombination events on differential disease severity in the context of host comorbidities and medication usage that blocks, suppresses, or activates differential host gene expression (eg, ACE2, TMPRSS2, etc).
- Understanding SAR‐CoV‐2 viral genetics over time and geography—particularly in terms of number and frequency of viral mutations and recombination events and their relationship to viral infectivity, transmissibility, disease severity, and clinical phenotype, viral burden, disease outcome, etc.
- Understanding potential interactions between SARS‐CoV‐2 and other respiratory co‐infections (notably, between 20%‐90% of COVID‐19 patients in the United States were co‐infected with at least one other respiratory pathogen).
- Understanding interactions and functional effects of various viral point mutations and recombination events on therapeutic monoclonal antibody, antiviral, and vaccine efficacy and possible adverse events.
Hello; This is just some copy and past of others comments. It shows you can copy and paste to be sure. Afraid this does not indicate understanding on your part. It is a listing of goals by the way.Dude, you are a cranky bastard, aren't you? Why can't you be bothered to actually read the article? Anyway, here you go...pick it apart...or ignore it. I don't really care at this point.
From a viral and host genetics point of view, there are critical knowledge gaps that direct our research agenda. Examples include the following:
- Understanding the role of ACE2, TMPRSS2, and other specific candidate host genes on COVID‐19 infection, severity, and disease outcome.
- Performing candidate gene, epigenetic, and GWAS studies across different racial and ethnic populations in order to identify genes and haplotypes associated with differential factors of infection and clinical outcome, as well as vaccine response.
- Systems genetic and biology studies to understand differential and interacting genetic effects on disease severity and outcome through the lens of the immune response network theory. 168
- Studies of any differential effect of viral mutations and recombination events on differential disease severity in the context of host comorbidities and medication usage that blocks, suppresses, or activates differential host gene expression (eg, ACE2, TMPRSS2, etc).
- Understanding SAR‐CoV‐2 viral genetics over time and geography—particularly in terms of number and frequency of viral mutations and recombination events and their relationship to viral infectivity, transmissibility, disease severity, and clinical phenotype, viral burden, disease outcome, etc.
- Understanding potential interactions between SARS‐CoV‐2 and other respiratory co‐infections (notably, between 20%‐90% of COVID‐19 patients in the United States were co‐infected with at least one other respiratory pathogen).
- Understanding interactions and functional effects of various viral point mutations and recombination events on therapeutic monoclonal antibody, antiviral, and vaccine efficacy and possible adverse events.
Not really. He said that your opinion would have no value. You wouldn't have to be a professional baseball player but you could be an amateur or be connected to the sport, like being a fan or a reporter each having a different valueWith that logic I can't talk pro baseball without first being a professional baseball player.
Again socialist ideas.
That went right over your head.Not really. He said that your opinion would have no value. You wouldn't have to be a professional baseball player but you could be an amateur or be connected to the sport, like being a fan or a reporter.
That's not a socialist idea at all really, quite the opposite.
Yep, nonsense.So they are saying they don't have a clue and are doing research.
Like I said, you are posting non-sense.
What does my understanding have to do with it? I just offered it as an interesting read and you want some sort of diatribe from me about the content of the article (which is in actuality a summary itself). That really isn't how science works. It is for you to read and research and come to your own informed conclusions.Hello; This is just some copy and past of others comments. It shows you can copy and paste to be sure. Afraid this does not indicate understanding on your part. It is a listing of goals by the way.
However, your scant opinions on the matter are not informed in the least. You are quite biased as well - and that clouds your judgement.That went right over your head.
I can study anything and get a well enough education to have an informed opinion without getting a degree.
The socialist idea is, only experts in the field are qualified to talk about a subject.
Just another form of censorship, or as is said now, cancel culture.