ForTehNguyen
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 23, 2015
- Threads
- 17
- Messages
- 2,248
- Reaction score
- 693
- Location
- Houston, Texas
- Vehicle(s)
- 15 GT
- Thread starter
- #1
http://www.minidsp.com/products/minidsp-in-a-box/c-dsp-6x8-detail
So AFTER (figures) i build my audio system utilizing two MiniDSP 2x4 and MiniDC, this new product comes out. It is a more clean and integrated setup than what I had in My Custom Audio Build thread:
http://www.mustang6g.com/forums/showthread.php?t=29714
C-DSP accepts low (up to 4V RMS) and high (up to 8V RMS) level inputs so this would work great with base or premium model owners. The MiniDC that I used on mine is integrated into this unit instead of being a separate exposed board. It also has an IR remote kit so you can control it from the cabin. It also looks like it supports multiple configurations where as my MiniDSPs only can support one currently tuned for the driver. Looking at the user manual the UI is definitely nicer than two 2x4.
While not a revolution better than my two 2x4 setup it is definitely evolutionary. If I were to build right now I would use this.
So AFTER (figures) i build my audio system utilizing two MiniDSP 2x4 and MiniDC, this new product comes out. It is a more clean and integrated setup than what I had in My Custom Audio Build thread:
http://www.mustang6g.com/forums/showthread.php?t=29714
C-DSP accepts low (up to 4V RMS) and high (up to 8V RMS) level inputs so this would work great with base or premium model owners. The MiniDC that I used on mine is integrated into this unit instead of being a separate exposed board. It also has an IR remote kit so you can control it from the cabin. It also looks like it supports multiple configurations where as my MiniDSPs only can support one currently tuned for the driver. Looking at the user manual the UI is definitely nicer than two 2x4.
While not a revolution better than my two 2x4 setup it is definitely evolutionary. If I were to build right now I would use this.
Sponsored
Last edited: