Sponsored

MAGNETIC S550 MUSTANG Thread

StangBANG

Patience; long suffering.
Joined
Mar 26, 2014
Threads
54
Messages
788
Reaction score
206
Location
NJ
First Name
Dean
Vehicle(s)
15 Magnetic GT. Performance Pack Premium Redline
I just changed my order from saddle to redline...looks hot!
Sponsored

 

scottpe

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2013
Threads
2
Messages
1,357
Reaction score
4
Location
DFW, TX
Vehicle(s)
2012 GT 6MT w/ Brembos
It's probably 426bhp and 529Nm (aka 390lb-ft, see link below). If that's the case, there's a 6bhp peak increase. If that is the case, then I'm assuming that all of the improvements have been made to broaden the overall powerband and make the mill more tractable. Peak power is only a single statistic.
There is almost ZERO chance these are the real numbers. The site these pics are from is basically the Chinese equivalent of Edmunds.com.

I still don't believe it though. It's too small of a gain. Wait for a real announcement.http://www.unitconversion.org/energy/newton-meters-to-foot-pounds-conversion.html
Agreed.
 

mhand52

Active Member
Joined
May 20, 2014
Threads
1
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
Location
Colorado
Vehicle(s)
2012 MCA V6 & e30 BMW
It's probably 426bhp and 529Nm (aka 390lb-ft, see link below). If that's the case, there's a 6bhp peak increase. If that is the case, then I'm assuming that all of the improvements have been made to broaden the overall powerband and make the mill more tractable. Peak power is only a single statistic.

I still don't believe it though. It's too small of a gain. Wait for a real announcement.

http://www.unitconversion.org/energy/newton-meters-to-foot-pounds-conversion.html
Thanks for that, my Chinese is rusty in the mornin'....:shrug:

Thats an aggresive fuel map and intake/manifold away from a Boss 302 now though...
 

scottpe

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2013
Threads
2
Messages
1,357
Reaction score
4
Location
DFW, TX
Vehicle(s)
2012 GT 6MT w/ Brembos
Thanks for that, my Chinese is rusty in the mornin'....:shrug:

Thats an aggresive fuel map and intake/manifold away from a Boss 302 now though...
You realize that the previous model GT made 420HP and 390lb-ft right? These numbers would imply almost no change was made to the peak power, despite a much touted laundry list of performance upgrades that have been made to the motor.

Anyway, I hate for this thread to get derailed too much. Let's just wait and see what Ford announces, or at least take the discussion over here, where it's already under way.
 

mhand52

Active Member
Joined
May 20, 2014
Threads
1
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
Location
Colorado
Vehicle(s)
2012 MCA V6 & e30 BMW
You realize that the previous model GT made 420HP and 390ft/lbs right? These numbers would mean almost no change was made to the peak power, despite a laundry list of performance upgrades that have been made to the motor.

Anyway, I hate for this thread to get derailed too much. Let's just wait and see what Ford announces.
Ha you don't have to convince me, I think its more too man. But I feel there's a little truth in everything. Maybe its numbers to the wheels like the Terminator Cobra. We can only speculate :thumbsup:
 

Sponsored

StangBANG

Patience; long suffering.
Joined
Mar 26, 2014
Threads
54
Messages
788
Reaction score
206
Location
NJ
First Name
Dean
Vehicle(s)
15 Magnetic GT. Performance Pack Premium Redline
Does anyone know if the engine turned dash with pp trumps the brushed aluminum dash if u get the color accent/premier trim w/redline? Im pretty sure it does but I just want to confirm it with you guys.
 

StangBANG

Patience; long suffering.
Joined
Mar 26, 2014
Threads
54
Messages
788
Reaction score
206
Location
NJ
First Name
Dean
Vehicle(s)
15 Magnetic GT. Performance Pack Premium Redline
Please disregard above post ... I found the discussion on this. .
 

carguy

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 28, 2013
Threads
23
Messages
347
Reaction score
78
Location
Cardiff, CA
First Name
Greg
Vehicle(s)
2015 GT PP
Anyone else concerned about the bubling of the center console? The same thing was happening on the silver GT PP that they had at Knotts Berry Farm and the Petersen Museum Mustang Madness. Hope they solve the issue with the final materials.
 

scottpe

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2013
Threads
2
Messages
1,357
Reaction score
4
Location
DFW, TX
Vehicle(s)
2012 GT 6MT w/ Brembos
Anyone else concerned about the bubling of the center console? The same thing was happening on the silver GT PP that they had at Knotts Berry Farm and the Petersen Museum Mustang Madness. Hope they solve the issue with the final materials.
Noticed that too and agree... hopefully Ford have taken note of that issue as well and already have a solution identified for production.
 

OppoLock

RWD Addict
Joined
Apr 21, 2014
Threads
43
Messages
3,093
Reaction score
871
Location
St. Petersburg, FL
First Name
Sean
Vehicle(s)
'15 GT, '20 GT350
Vehicle Showcase
1
Anyone else concerned about the bubling of the center console? The same thing was happening on the silver GT PP that they had at Knotts Berry Farm and the Petersen Museum Mustang Madness. Hope they solve the issue with the final materials.
Not at all. There's no fathomable way that Ford would let something as glaring as that slip past QC for production models.
 

Sponsored

carguy

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 28, 2013
Threads
23
Messages
347
Reaction score
78
Location
Cardiff, CA
First Name
Greg
Vehicle(s)
2015 GT PP
Not at all. There's no fathomable way that Ford would let something as glaring as that slip past QC for production models.
I completely agree, but it's surprising that they would let so many of the pre-production run the circuit like that.
 

jeebuspwnz

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 27, 2014
Threads
3
Messages
187
Reaction score
3
Location
SD
Vehicle(s)
m3
It's probably 426bhp and 529Nm (aka 390lb-ft, see link below). If that's the case, there's a 6bhp peak increase. If that is the case, then I'm assuming that all of the improvements have been made to broaden the overall powerband and make the mill more tractable. Peak power is only a single statistic.

I still don't believe it though. It's too small of a gain. Wait for a real announcement.

http://www.unitconversion.org/energy/newton-meters-to-foot-pounds-conversion.html
It's not 426HP. It's 426PS...which converts to 420HP. So just as the Nm converted to exactly the old torque figure, this converts to exactly the old HP figure. So essentially, just like everyone else, they don't know what the new output will be so they are using the old figures.
 

scottpe

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2013
Threads
2
Messages
1,357
Reaction score
4
Location
DFW, TX
Vehicle(s)
2012 GT 6MT w/ Brembos
It's not 426HP. It's 426PS...which converts to 420HP. So just as the Nm converted to exactly the old torque figure, this converts to exactly the old HP figure. So essentially, just like everyone else, they don't know what the new output will be so they are using the old figures.
Ah yeah, you're right. Good catch. Crisis averted... ;)
 

RisingForce

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 16, 2014
Threads
29
Messages
785
Reaction score
33
Location
Out of this world
Vehicle(s)
90 tempo.
It's not 426HP. It's 426PS...which converts to 420HP. So just as the Nm converted to exactly the old torque figure, this converts to exactly the old HP figure. So essentially, just like everyone else, they don't know what the new output will be so they are using the old figures.

My guess would be 445-452 HP.
 
 








Top