Sponsored

How much can the blocks handle?

Reds197

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 17, 2014
Threads
29
Messages
1,028
Reaction score
339
Location
KC
Vehicle(s)
18 BASE (sold)16 LPF 62mm 16 Whipple 15 VMP MT-82
I would not hesitate to run 700-750rwhp with these engines, personally.

The weak link at that level will be the pistons. If the tune is good, and you keep the heat out...then it will live for a while.

YEP. Run E-85 and a good tune!
Sponsored

 

Reds197

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 17, 2014
Threads
29
Messages
1,028
Reaction score
339
Location
KC
Vehicle(s)
18 BASE (sold)16 LPF 62mm 16 Whipple 15 VMP MT-82
Hellion got 900+rwhp with their twin turbo kits.....with a good tune. That is the key....the tune.
They have a 15-20% correction factor to account for altitude and weather conditions. It is closer to 725. I would not think about 900 on a stock engine.
 

95cobby

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2014
Threads
8
Messages
215
Reaction score
30
Location
Houston, TX
Vehicle(s)
2015 Mustang GT PP
They have a 15-20% correction factor to account for altitude and weather conditions. It is closer to 725. I would not think about 900 on a stock engine.
So you're assuming they used the wrong correction factor for their SAE dyno numbers..? Not sure where you're getting that info from but SAE accounts for air temp, pressure, altitude, etc.. granted the computer/they entered the right numbers.
 

Reds197

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 17, 2014
Threads
29
Messages
1,028
Reaction score
339
Location
KC
Vehicle(s)
18 BASE (sold)16 LPF 62mm 16 Whipple 15 VMP MT-82
So you're assuming they used the wrong correction factor for their SAE dyno numbers..? Not sure where you're getting that info from but SAE accounts for air temp, pressure, altitude, etc.. granted the computer/they entered the right numbers.

NOPE.

I am sure they used the correct SAE numbers. I get my information from living in Denver. My past cars made 750 SAE corrected. But the actual number was 620 due to the altitude.
Sponsored

 
 








Top