Sponsored

Hellcat Production - Lessons Learned

Cruzinaround

Banned
Banned
Joined
May 1, 2014
Threads
0
Messages
929
Reaction score
121
Location
NEPA
First Name
Joe
Vehicle(s)
2016 GT350, 2011 GT Premium, 2012 BMW M3, Etc Etc
Exactly. A local GM dealer that specializes in performance vehicles has 6-7 Charger Hellcats and a few Challengers too. All selling for 78-79,995 and some are not even new. Unreal. I'm curious to know the actual transaction price as their asking prices are always sky high.

I looked at a 14 Z/28 from the same place with 10k miles and non factory Toyo T1 tires. They wanted 61k. You can get a 4-5k mile car for 55K. :crazy:
Sorry in advance for the long winded post...

I had a recent conversation with a GM from a different dealership than the one I'm currently working with and patiently waiting for my GT350 from.

I asked him why is it that only in the Automobile industry do we see such a practice of price gouging when it comes to new models in spite of the announced MSRP netting a pretty good profit margin already?

He then blurted out something about customers always thinking the salesmen are the worst and how they make the experience horrible when they come in expecting any car on the lot for invoice or less. He claimed that the stereotypes are perpetuated by the cheap customers always coming in and beating up on the salesmen to get prices well below MSRP. I kid you not...he said this.

I reminded him the Vehicle was not his or the dealership owners, that only the bank note was theirs and a responsibility to pay for it and in the dealerships best interest to move the product sooner than later(there was a moment of awkward silence) I think he actually had to think about that and realized I was right. i then Let him know that Jim Owens and Jamal Hameedi already announced publicly as spokesmen for FORD that the car would be surprisingly affordable. Which is completely opposite of his quest to ADM the vehicle prices into the same territory as other cars that are traditionally not considered affordable but now would be considered as options because of his selling tactic. I added that the entire experience and that stereotype is predicated on the fact that the buyer never knows what the best price is and never leaves knowing if they truly got the best price. And the Seller can set any price they want based on the boundaries set by the volume levels they commit to in advance of being floor inventoried by the Manufacturer.

He said that he has a right to charge more than the standard 7% margin on a Specialty Vehicle. And his examples to that argument was that if the Diamond industry can charge 800% and the Furniture industry can charge 800% markups on their products then its acceptable for him to markup on this vehicle.

Then I schooled him on the principles of both industries he attempted to use as his case argument.

1. The Diamond is a harvested product not a manufactured product. The harvesting process can be done by a dedicated individual prospector or by a larger consortium in a mining operation where all the employees harvest the product for them. The difference being the product is theirs to set a price on to the cutters and resellers who then own those diamonds and set their prices based on size weight clarity and the precision of the cut which determine the price that the final diamond that is subjectively priced. If however we were able to recreate the process of making that same quality diamond in a manufacturing process then the prices would be drastically dropped since the masses now have this available to them and the harvesting process is no longer required...However, Diamonds are not a purchase of practical use such as a vehicle they are a purchase of vanity.

2. The Designer furniture market caters to the wealthy and hand built furniture demands prices which are also subjective based on what the designer and the craftsman believe they are worth for their time and skills. However, there are only so many permutations of a sofa or couch or armchair and once the initial design is made there are plenty of manufacturing facilities that can and will mass produce that same design and mirror the quality and look and feel for far less than the designers can compete with. Therefore offering the rest of us the choice to buy the same thing for far less than wholesale designer hand crafted furniture. The key being a mass produced manufactured process.

To which I added, if you want to use examples to compare selling your car to then you need to look at manufactured goods. Which when they come off the assembly line typically sell in a retail environment for list prices as suggested by the manufacturer.

So, I then told him to go speak to the owner of this dealership and ask him if making the sale or making the customer is more important. He was speechless and did not have an answer about what the owner would think.

In fact I had to contact the owner right in front of him and got the answer he was afraid to hear. (being that I do research ahead of any large purchase I already had the contact information of the owner) If MSRP would make me a customer then that is what the car would sell for if I'm a serious buyer. So as of today I now have two dealers and two cars waiting for me to buy them.

The GT350R is likely mine if I want it, too. So I have to think about this and perhaps call the owner again. In any case the GM was more interested in a sale at that moment and less interested in a customer for life. What the owner got was that customer for life.

See how that works salespeople...
Sponsored

 

Essex Wire

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 4, 2015
Threads
9
Messages
94
Reaction score
50
Location
LA
Vehicle(s)
Shelby GT350 Tech Pkg
Sorry in advance for the long winded post...

I had a recent conversation with a GM from a different dealership than the one I'm currently working with and patiently waiting for my GT350 from.

I asked him why is it that only in the Automobile industry do we see such a practice of price gouging when it comes to new models in spite of the announced MSRP netting a pretty good profit margin already?

He then blurted out something about customers always thinking the salesmen are the worst and how they make the experience horrible when they come in expecting any car on the lot for invoice or less. He claimed that the stereotypes are perpetuated by the cheap customers always coming in and beating up on the salesmen to get prices well below MSRP. I kid you not...he said this.

I reminded him the Vehicle was not his or the dealership owners, that only the bank note was theirs and a responsibility to pay for it and in the dealerships best interest to move the product sooner than later(there was a moment of awkward silence) I think he actually had to think about that and realized I was right. i then Let him know that Jim Owens and Jamal Hameedi already announced publicly as spokesmen for FORD that the car would be surprisingly affordable. Which is completely opposite of his quest to ADM the vehicle prices into the same territory as other cars that are traditionally not considered affordable but now would be considered as options because of his selling tactic. I added that the entire experience and that stereotype is predicated on the fact that the buyer never knows what the best price is and never leaves knowing if they truly got the best price. And the Seller can set any price they want based on the boundaries set by the volume levels they commit to in advance of being floor inventoried by the Manufacturer.

He said that he has a right to charge more than the standard 7% margin on a Specialty Vehicle. And his examples to that argument was that if the Diamond industry can charge 800% and the Furniture industry can charge 800% markups on their products then its acceptable for him to markup on this vehicle.

Then I schooled him on the principles of both industries he attempted to use as his case argument.

1. The Diamond is a harvested product not a manufactured product. The harvesting process can be done by a dedicated individual prospector or by a larger consortium in a mining operation where all the employees harvest the product for them. The difference being the product is theirs to set a price on to the cutters and resellers who then own those diamonds and set their prices based on size weight clarity and the precision of the cut which determine the price that the final diamond that is subjectively priced. If however we were able to recreate the process of making that same quality diamond in a manufacturing process then the prices would be drastically dropped since the masses now have this available to them and the harvesting process is no longer required...However, Diamonds are not a purchase of practical use such as a vehicle they are a purchase of vanity.

2. The Designer furniture market caters to the wealthy and hand built furniture demands prices which are also subjective based on what the designer and the craftsman believe they are worth for their time and skills. However, there are only so many permutations of a sofa or couch or armchair and once the initial design is made there are plenty of manufacturing facilities that can and will mass produce that same design and mirror the quality and look and feel for far less than the designers can compete with. Therefore offering the rest of us the choice to buy the same thing for far less than wholesale designer hand crafted furniture. The key being a mass produced manufactured process.

To which I added, if you want to use examples to compare selling your car to then you need to look at manufactured goods. Which when they come off the assembly line typically sell in a retail environment for list prices as suggested by the manufacturer.

So, I then told him to go speak to the owner of this dealership and ask him if making the sale or making the customer is more important. He was speechless and did not have an answer about what the owner would think.

In fact I had to contact the owner right in front of him and got the answer he was afraid to hear. (being that I do research ahead of any large purchase I already had the contact information of the owner) If MSRP would make me a customer then that is what the car would sell for if I'm a serious buyer. So as of today I now have two dealers and two cars waiting for me to buy them.

The GT350R is likely mine if I want it, too. So I have to think about this and perhaps call the owner again. In any case the GM was more interested in a sale at that moment and less interested in a customer for life. What the owner got was that customer for life.

See how that works salespeople...
Can I hire YOU to get me a 350 at MSRP? I'd gladly give you a few grand "ADM" personally than give it to a dealership. ;)
 

TOPdeadCENTER

Member
Joined
May 30, 2015
Threads
1
Messages
22
Reaction score
2
Location
North Dakota
Vehicle(s)
'11 GT500 SVTPP
This may have been discussed already, but one thing to consider is that production numbers may be limited due to the CAFE fuel efficiency standards. The more gas guzzlers a manufacturer sells, the lower the Corporate Average becomes. Maybe these production numbers are too low to make a dent in CAFE but another point is that a lot of buyers hope these cars remain limited production to improve exclusivity and resale values.

In the overall scheme of things, cars like the gt350 probably don't add a lot to the company's bottom line given the development costs. These cars are more of a statement by ford that the mustang isn't just a "straight line" car that can't handle the corners. Most buyers welcome low production numbers - as long as they can get one without paying huge ADM.
 

prevent34

Member
Joined
Jul 21, 2015
Threads
0
Messages
21
Reaction score
1
Location
oh
Vehicle(s)
cts
Bunch of stupid people or just ignorant is my guess. Think they know better about Ford/Shelby's plans than Ford/Shelby corporate :crazy:

Facts:

Fact- Jim Owens is the VP Marketing at Shelby Automobiles- in the "know" clearly
Fact- Owens said the GT350 would have production numbers between Boss and GT500 production numbers
Fact- There were roughly 4,000 Bosses made in 2012 and 13 respectively
Fact- There were no more than 5,100 GT500s at the peak production (absent 2007-2008 which Ford has also admitted was a mistake making that many and toned down every year after that to 5,000 or less from 2009-2014)

The 5,000 fits in the 4,000-5,100 range.

Anything else is mere speculation until Ford announces otherwise. Another retarded "I reject your realty and in its place substitute my own"
Why don't you take the time that you spend calling other members of this forum "stupid" and "ignorant" and do a little research. Your "fact" about Jim Owen is WRONG. He works for Ford not Shelby.
 

DrumReaper

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 17, 2015
Threads
114
Messages
4,978
Reaction score
3,700
Location
South East
Vehicle(s)
1971 429CJ Mach 1, 2012 Boss 302
If they can figure out the fuel efficiency of the FPC then it could be a game changer. Maybe forced induction for the GT500? Who knows? Direct injection? Until then the VooDoo has a singular purpose and hence a shelf life on account of the CAFE stds IMHO. Going to be fun to find out that's for sure.
Ford still has a few performance cars to bring out... I heard rumors of. Ford Pantera revisit and they still could make a 50th anniversary AC Cobra revisit. So who knows?...

*DISCLAIMER*

The above statement was mere fantasy and rumor. Please do not take it as INTERNET LEGIT. Carry on...
 

Sponsored

2Cool

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 4, 2014
Threads
16
Messages
604
Reaction score
257
Location
Melbourne, FL
First Name
Ian
Vehicle(s)
2015 Mustang GT Premium, PP in CO
Ford still has a few performance cars to bring out... I heard rumors of. Ford Pantera revisit and they still could make a 50th anniversary AC Cobra revisit. So who knows?...

*DISCLAIMER*

The above statement was mere fantasy and rumor. Please do not take it as INTERNET LEGIT. Carry on...
No problem disregarding it, as De Tomaso made the Pantera using Ford engines, it was not a Ford product or model name.
 

Cruzinaround

Banned
Banned
Joined
May 1, 2014
Threads
0
Messages
929
Reaction score
121
Location
NEPA
First Name
Joe
Vehicle(s)
2016 GT350, 2011 GT Premium, 2012 BMW M3, Etc Etc
^ I'm really feeling positive about the Mach 1 twin ecoboost Coyote variant. or possibly a twincharger setup for a new GT500.

Neither of which haven't been done before, but if they decide on a twin charging setup it would possibly be a first for a mainstream manufacturer like this. It would combine the power and the efficiency of both Turbo and supercharging to have 100% positive boost all the time. Slapped onto a Coyote or even a VooDoo power plant would make this a beast of legend.
 

prevent34

Member
Joined
Jul 21, 2015
Threads
0
Messages
21
Reaction score
1
Location
oh
Vehicle(s)
cts
Ford still has a few performance cars to bring out... I heard rumors of. Ford Pantera revisit and they still could make a 50th anniversary AC Cobra revisit. So who knows?...

*DISCLAIMER*

The above statement was mere fantasy and rumor. Please do not take it as INTERNET LEGIT. Carry on...
Wow, a Pantera redo, how cool would that be.
 

Glenn G

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 3, 2015
Threads
51
Messages
2,075
Reaction score
814
Location
Kaiserslautern, Germany
First Name
Glenn
Vehicle(s)
15 DIB 6MT base Ecoboost
^ I'm really feeling positive about the Mach 1 twin ecoboost Coyote variant. or possibly a twincharger setup for a new GT500.

Neither of which haven't been done before, but if they decide on a twin charging setup it would possibly be a first for a mainstream manufacturer like this. It would combine the power and the efficiency of both Turbo and supercharging to have 100% positive boost all the time. Slapped onto a Coyote or even a VooDoo power plant would make this a beast of legend.
Definitely not first for a mainstream manufacturer, VW group has had twin charged engines in these cars since 05, '2005 VW Golf Mk5, 2006 VW Touran, 2008 Audi A3, 2008 VW Scirocco, 2007 SEAT LeĂłn, 2008 Ĺ koda Octavia, 2009 VW Tiguan, 2009 VW Golf Mk6'

it would be the first time it was used by an American manufacturer in a main stream product and the first mainstream use in a performance application.

The 1.4 VW engine is an attempt to 'game' the German road tax system, which is based on CO2 and displacement and have a car that wasn't a nightmare to get on the Autobahn in.
 

Cruzinaround

Banned
Banned
Joined
May 1, 2014
Threads
0
Messages
929
Reaction score
121
Location
NEPA
First Name
Joe
Vehicle(s)
2016 GT350, 2011 GT Premium, 2012 BMW M3, Etc Etc
Definitely not first for a mainstream manufacturer, VW group has had twin charged engines in these cars since 05, '2005 VW Golf Mk5, 2006 VW Touran, 2008 Audi A3, 2008 VW Scirocco, 2007 SEAT LeĂłn, 2008 Ĺ koda Octavia, 2009 VW Tiguan, 2009 VW Golf Mk6'

it would be the first time it was used by an American manufacturer in a main stream product and the first mainstream use in a performance application.

The 1.4 VW engine is an attempt to 'game' the German road tax system, which is based on CO2 and displacement and have a car that wasn't a nightmare to get on the Autobahn in.
I was thinking not been done before by an American Manufacturer. But, thanks... I get it on why VW would do it.
 

Sponsored

ElSanchez302

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 9, 2015
Threads
2
Messages
78
Reaction score
12
Location
Los Angeles
Vehicle(s)
2018 GT PP1
Yeah, a lot less RnD for stroking out and existing motor vs building one from the ground up with a completely different architecture. And they still sold almost 10,000 of those. We will have the Gt350 for 16/17, beyond that who knows.
Actually, you could say that differences between the 5.4 vs the 5.8 are pretty similar to the difference between a 5.0 and 5.2. Both stroked, stonger internals, new intakes, heads, etc. So, if Ford was willing to do only two years on the Trinity, no reason why they wouldn't do two years on a less expensive motor. And yes, the Voodoo will be less expensive...no blower, no intercooler, etc.
 

ElSanchez302

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 9, 2015
Threads
2
Messages
78
Reaction score
12
Location
Los Angeles
Vehicle(s)
2018 GT PP1
^ I'm really feeling positive about the Mach 1 twin ecoboost Coyote variant. or possibly a twincharger setup for a new GT500.

Neither of which haven't been done before, but if they decide on a twin charging setup it would possibly be a first for a mainstream manufacturer like this. It would combine the power and the efficiency of both Turbo and supercharging to have 100% positive boost all the time. Slapped onto a Coyote or even a VooDoo power plant would make this a beast of legend.
Wait wait wait. Holy shit. I'm in! How much is the ADM?! :lol:
 

DrumReaper

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 17, 2015
Threads
114
Messages
4,978
Reaction score
3,700
Location
South East
Vehicle(s)
1971 429CJ Mach 1, 2012 Boss 302
Actually, you could say that differences between the 5.4 vs the 5.8 are pretty similar to the difference between a 5.0 and 5.2. Both stroked, stonger internals, new intakes, heads, etc. So, if Ford was willing to do only two years on the Trinity, no reason why they wouldn't do two years on a less expensive motor. And yes, the Voodoo will be less expensive...no blower, no intercooler, etc.
Everyone thinks Ford has to recoup so much money for the GT350. There are tricks of the trade of auto production that most of us are not privy to that Ford capitalizes upon to bring such technology to market and seriously undersell competitors capable of similar performance.

We learned that lesson with the 2005/6 GT. If they produced that at $150K - of which many said it was an overpriced Ford while others said it was too much performance for the money - why can't they do it with the 350?
 

Cruzinaround

Banned
Banned
Joined
May 1, 2014
Threads
0
Messages
929
Reaction score
121
Location
NEPA
First Name
Joe
Vehicle(s)
2016 GT350, 2011 GT Premium, 2012 BMW M3, Etc Etc
Everyone thinks Ford has to recoup so much money for the GT350. There are tricks of the trade of auto production that most of us are not privy to that Ford capitalizes upon to bring such technology to market and seriously undersell competitors capable of similar performance.

We learned that lesson with the 2005/6 GT. If they produced that at $150K - of which many said it was an overpriced Ford while others said it was too much performance for the money - why can't they do it with the 350?

A lot of those tricks involve partnering with a 3rd party solutions provider that can manufacture to meet demand.... Like Eaton to produce the blowers or Carbon Revolution to produce wheels etc,etc. If they require bringing things in house then they can simply buy a company if its in the cards to do so and then ramp up production even more. Keeping in mind it was FORD that pumped out the first mass production assembly lines to meet the demands of the public...FORD ain't gonna let opportunity to make money slip away.

The surprising part about this car.....82% of it is manufactured outside of the USA and then it is assembled here. Its not the All American car of our past.

But you know what....I still like it.
 

Blk2015GT

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2015
Threads
16
Messages
2,846
Reaction score
755
Location
.
Vehicle(s)
2015 GT
The premise/title of this thread is ridiculous to begin with.

A "Hellcat" is whatever they stick the big supercharged engine in. Same car, just stick in a new engine with some badges and it's now a Hellcat Challenger, Hellcat Charger, etc.

A GT350 is MUCH more different a car compared to a GT than the Hellcats are from their underlying cars.

Obviously it is easy to double production next year (and since they cut 900 orders out this year because they cannot meet demand) when you just really need more engines to stick in your Challengers/Chargers. You can't "just double production" on the GT350 because it's way more of a different car than its underlying Mustang.

Hell half of the sheet metal is different on the GT350 than the regular Mustang- everything but the doors, rear quarters and maybe the trunk lid; everything else is unique; unlike the Challenger Hellcat which is build as the same car with some cat badges on the sides but otherwise same bodywork.
Sponsored

 
 








Top