Sponsored

Has anyone driven both a non-PP and a PP GT?

dwaleke

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2014
Threads
19
Messages
895
Reaction score
117
Location
USA
Vehicle(s)
Jeep
The only 2015 I've driven was a non-PP GT and the suspension felt "bouncy" to me if that description makes sense. I haven't driven a PP car, but after reading these reviews, I'm more comfortable with my non-PP order. Thanks!
Bouncy could describe an underdamped suspension. The GT PP has better dampers so likely would be better.
Sponsored

 

Nitro

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 14, 2014
Threads
18
Messages
560
Reaction score
76
Location
Michigan
Vehicle(s)
2015 Mustang GTPP
I haven't driven a non-PP, but I felt that the PP was softer than I thought it would be. I am ordering a PP because I think it is a good balance of comfort and performance. I am assuming that the non-PP would be too floaty for my liking.
 

Jon B.

Farm Truck
Joined
Nov 23, 2014
Threads
4
Messages
127
Reaction score
17
Location
North Carolina
Vehicle(s)
'15 Premium PP GT, '01 Lightning
I've driven them both back to back, and I believe the pp is the way the base car should be IMO. It's not even close to being overly harsh, the brakes are probably overkill, but it's the sum of the parts for the pp car. It's not just suspension.
 

Spartan

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2014
Threads
94
Messages
3,883
Reaction score
569
Location
MD
Vehicle(s)
Ford Explorer Sport
I wouldn't be surprised to see them make some changes to the suspension for 2016 and make it more like the PP one...especially since Europe is only getting PP spec'd Mustangs.
 
 








Top