That's kinda what I was thinking. If my stock sized tubing only allows so much flow what good would a sensor do? Not to mention it cost $295 for just the sensor....as in without a tube or complete CAI.
Funny thing is everyone on here(myself included) seems to get hot and heavy whenever a new intake comes out, only to have another one come out a week or two later that uses a different pitch...and on and on :lol:
Are you stock or tuned? Let us know the outcome once installed. Butt dyno is fine with me as CAI's can be manipulated easily with a cars hood up and fans blowing into them.
im lund tuned on e85, did you guys see the video? dyno before and after. for 300, its cheaper than every other cai and looks more promising
Not to suggest the PMAS intake isn't impressive, but so far all we have is data provided by the manufacturer. Manufacturers always skew their results to maximize sales--every manufacturer on this site does it, some doing it more than others. I'd chill until more people come forward with independently verified data to support PMAS' claim that the unit provides "20hp and 15trq". Just a suggestion, I wouldn't base my decision just on what a manufacturer says--I'd wait for people to provide some real world results and data before you buy. My $.02
What's difficult for me to understand is that PMAS said in their thread that the stock tune already could handle giving the car more fuel/timing but without the calibrated MAF it wouldn't due to the reading....However with their CAI/calibrated MAF/it would allow the car to read and increase fuel/timing/power....Now someones saying you can't just use a calibrated MAF without their CAI, but someone else who sells the same CAI/ MAF also sells just the MAF :shrug:
