Ford supports defund police

[lonegunman]

To some extent, yes. For sure. I’m doing it quite deliberately in order to make a point.
If a nation allows unmitigated capitalism to be the primary or even sole driver, the outcomes for certain sections of the population won’t be great... the knock-on effect being even less appealing for those who think they’re above it all.
Simple things like minimum wages aren’t the result of a completely capitalist-centric model. They’re the direct result of a socialistic structure that recognises at least SOME level of equality or at the bare minimum, denies capitalism it’s every wish.
Those at the top (or even the middle) often very quickly forget that SOMEONE has to do the shitty low paying jobs. Once you allow the market absolute free reign, you can forget about simple protection measures that allow people to earn a “decent” living. You typically end up with a race to the bottom.

Capitalism is great. I love it. But it also needs checks and balances to ensure that the people at the bottom don’t become so disenfranchised that they simply quit being part of it and engage in criminal activity (for example) that might yield far greater returns.
There’s probably nothing more dangerous than a person who feels they have nothing to lose.
Call it humanitarian values, call it leftist socialist ideals, whatever.
The point remains that IMO, the left needs the right as much as the reverse is true.
The extremes of either side hold zero appeal for me personally.

I really like this glowing explanation of life as a leftist troll. He admits he lies, conflates and distorts as if that makes his point correct. Few economies run a true Capitalist model but in his warped mind he tries to justify his distorted world view as some sort of honorable opposition of capitalism. The police do not exist to protect "capitalism".

Somehow he has slid from defunding the police and allowing anarchy to rule the day to a defense of "low paying jobs". Here is a guy, demanding lawless mobs of violent leftist thugs be allowed to run the streets, attacking, killing or burning out people they disagree with. Along with his like-minded cronies he wants to shit on veterans for the crime of serving their nation, demands they are black balled from employment based of previous status as service members. Like his forefather's in NAZI Germany, Burkey would have them tattooed and forced to wear the modern Democrats version of a Star of David on their clothes.

His version of "humanitarian values" is pretty appalling on it's face. This "humanitarian", fails to recognize that the vast majority of deaths in the black community are from violence they inflict on one another, so he blames the police. Burkey holds the police responsible for crime in minority communities by claiming they have far less crime and their problems stem from excessive police presence in their community.

Fun fact, if you had the skills to use Google, you could look it up for yourself. Uniform Crime Statistics are compiled by the DOJ. You might like this one. 53% of all murders in the country are committed by black-Americans, they make up 13% of the population. I know.......................I know........................you want to scream I'm racist for knowing a fact and telling you. Here is the best part, this is not a result of "Over-policing an oppressed minority", it is a result of Black people killing each other. 88% of these killing are black on black crimes, the other 12% are whites/Hispanics killing people, DOJ generally lumps us together for some reason, probably to get the "white" numbers up.

Is it "over-policing"? I wonder, are white murder rates far higher and white people simply refuse to report murders in their community?

Well, what about the fact that 29% of rapes, 54% of robberies, 29% of burglaries, 32% of car thefts, 32% of frauds are committed by blacks? Is that over-policing? BTW, these stats are proudly announced on the BLM Twitter feed. They posted them.



These problems were created by people just like you. You vote for crap leftist policies. You vote for politicians and judges and people who feel that not prosecuting crime will somehow make crime go away. You vote for idiot tax and spend leftists, who squander every dollar we give them with no results and then you vote to ignore the results of your stupid policies and dumb ideas. Then, you move to a conservative low tax state and start spouting your stupid shit all over again. You fled the mess you made in New York because you are cowardly and to ignorant to fix the mess. Rudy fixed it and you hate him. Damn Giuliani for ending the era of mob control in New York, right?

You rant against Trump for lowering black unemployment to historic low levels, something Obama never did. You rant against Trump for signing sentencing reform into law and reversing Joe Biden's horrible prison policies from the 1990's. You mock Trump for supporting the police and military and yet Joe Biden ducked the draft and you are silent. You scream because Trump once rode Jeff Epstein's plane from Palm Beach to New York and ignore the 23 times Bill Clinton rode it to pedo-island in the Caribbean. Joe Biden's kid along with John Kerry's opened an investment fund with $500K from their daddies and $1,500,000,000.00 dollars from the Chinese communists, was that wrong or questionable??? I wonder??? I wonder if you called your broker and told him to refuse to take the gains your retirement account made under Trump? Did you pay extra because your taxes were to low? Is it perfectly legal to do that btw.

Keep distorting lefty..............................we are almost ready to vote Biden.

Sponsored

 

[Caballus]

It's interesting how those who never served continue to use those who serve as a basis for their arguments.

 

[lonegunman]

It's interesting how those who never served continue to use those who serve as a basis for their arguments.

Who do you think, "never served"? Besides Obama, Chuck Schumer and Joe Biden. I'm always entertained by leftists who claim that lacking military service means a Republican should not be allowed to run for office and also claim having military service as an excuse to deny you employment, add you to a terrorist watch list or otherwise deny your rights. Democrats using military service the way they used race when they fought to keep segregation. Plenty of left leaning people serve in the military and then strangely feel their military service should be respected while the rest of those they served with are denied or otherwise impugned.

https://www.insidesources.com/joe-b...s-a-lot-like-donald-trumps-do-democrats-care/

https://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/04/16/napolitano.apology/

3.5% of people under 35 are veterans, less than 1% will ever serve unless we have the draft again. For people out there trying to burn down Federal buildings and throwing bricks at cops, serving your country in any capacity is not something they think of doing.

 

[Caballus]

Who do you think, "never served"? Besides Obama, Chuck Schumer and Joe Biden. I'm always entertained by leftists who claim that lacking military service means a Republican should not be allowed to run for office and on the other hand claim having military service as an excuse to deny you employment, add you to a terrorist watch list or otherwise deny your rights. Plenty of left leaning people serve in the military and then strangely feel their military service should be respected while the rest of those they served with are denied or otherwise impugned.

https://www.insidesources.com/joe-b...s-a-lot-like-donald-trumps-do-democrats-care/

https://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/04/16/napolitano.apology/

99% of America, regardless to their politics, do not serve in any capacity whatsoever. Many actively avoid service, yet they claim citizenship and base their arguments on those who serve in some capacity or another. That is our nation. Add to that the poor physical condition, the drug use by those with means, the emotional health... Not speaking left or right. Speaking about our nation.

 

[lonegunman]

No disagreement there. If they lowered the standards enough to accept most of these people, they couldn't be depended upon to take out the trash, much less defend the nation.

 

[Caballus]

No disagreement there. If they lowered the standards enough to accept most of these people, they couldn't be depended upon to take out the trash, much less defend the nation.

The standards have been lowered, which is a problem. Fortunately, the pendulum is swinging back. The issue is not the standards, however. In part, it's the population that cannot meet the standards, yet remain in denial about it. In part it is the lack of commitment and desire to serve--entitlement. This is not true of any particular generation (i.e., millennials) or any particular race; it is true of Americans in general. In fact, millenials have shouldered the burden over the past decades and minorities and immigrants continue to serve disproportionately, while fat drugged up citizens applaud from the sidelines. No emotion there--just facts.

 

[lonegunman]

So you are working your way to some hate for fat white people but you haven't yet worked up the courage for a racist rant, is that it?

According to science and the census, America is 74% honkies...................the military is 69% honkies. apparently whitey is still holding up his end.

America is 13% African American...................................the military is 17% African American.

America is 17.6% Hispanic.............................................the military is 17% is Hispanic. In keeping with weird racist skewing, Hispanics are consider a sub-set of white people.

America is just under 1% native American.........................the military is just under 1% native American.

America is 5% Asian............................................................the military is 5% Asian.

Now, the military is still working off two biological sexes and has yet to recognize the hundreds of genders currently available to people, so we do not know how many "pan-sexual metronomes" or "bifurcated transsexual Dweezle voles" we have serving but that is coming.

I can see the day is coming in which qualifications for a promotion or career field are to be considered a distant third behind race and sexual preference so that we can send young people to the deaths with a sense of fairness, knowing the most qualified are not leading them into battle because they happened to be the wrong color at promotion time. Remember when they put a white general in charge of the war and propped an incompetent black general up as it's commander? We called it Desert Storm.

As my old commander said, "once you have seen everything twice, it's time to retire". I retired after 27 years myself.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_the_United_States#Race

https://download.militaryonesource.mil/12038/MOS/Reports/2018-demographics-report.pdf

P.S. It does not appear to be only minority and immigrants serving, at least according to the Department of Defense and Census.

 

[Caballus]

So you are working your way to some hate for fat white people but you haven't yet worked up the courage for a racist rant, is that it?

According to science and the census, America is 74% honkies...................the military is 69% honkies. apparently whitey is still holding up his end.

America is 13% African American...................................the military is 17% African American.

America is 17.6% Hispanic.............................................the military is 17% is Hispanic. In keeping with weird racist skewing, Hispanics are consider a sub-set of white people.

America is just under 1% native American.........................the military is just under 1% native American.

America is 5% Asian............................................................the military is 5% Asian.

Now, the military is still working off two biological sexes and has yet to recognize the hundreds of genders currently available to people, so we do not know how many "pan-sexual metronomes" or "bifurcated transsexual Dweezle voles" we have serving but that is coming.

I can see the day is coming in which qualifications for a promotion or career field are to be considered a distant third behind race and sexual preference so that we can send young people to the deaths with a sense of fairness, knowing the most qualified are not leading them into battle because they happened to be the wrong color at promotion time. Remember when they put a white general in charge of the war and propped an incompetent black general up as it's commander? We called it Desert Storm.

As my old commander said, "once you have seen everything twice, it's time to retire". I retired after 27 years myself.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_the_United_States#Race

https://download.militaryonesource.mil/12038/MOS/Reports/2018-demographics-report.pdf

Not sure how you ended up with fat white people and racial slurs as a subject. Point is neither partisan nor racial--hard for some to accept it seems. Simple point is that Americans do not serve and are unqualified to serve. Those who do not serve make the most noise about honoring service. Period.

Edit: to your point: https://taskandpurpose.com/news/army-promotions-racial-bias

1. Look at your stats on enlisted ranks
2. GEN Schwartzkopf commanded Desert Storm. If you're referring to GEN Powell, the CJCS does not command anything. We are not Russia--we don't have a General Staff.
3. Point does not change. Americans are unqualified and unwilling to serve.

 

[Burkey]

@lonegunman
Please allow me to break it down for you.

“I really like this glowing explanation of life as a leftist troll”
I wasn’t trolling, I was using YOUR kind of EXTREME language to show you what a dickhead you look like. Maybe that IS trolling?

“He admits he lies, conflates and distorts as if that makes his point correct.”
See above

“Few economies run a true Capitalist model but in his warped mind he tries to justify his distorted world view as some sort of honorable opposition of capitalism.”
I don’t oppose capitalism....i started quite clearly that I like capitalism BUT that it needs checks and balances. What an extreme left idea. Balance.

The police do not exist to protect "capitalism".
At no point did I say they did...
Who’s trolling now?
What I said was, if you allowed capitalism to reach it’s absolute conclusion, without any protections, literally everything would exist on a user pays system. Remember, it’s typically, the right who argue that they want less government intervention. It could easily be argued that FORCING people to pay for such services through their taxes, rather than giving them the option, is in fact some sort of over-governance. Again, it’s simply a thought-experiment to show that the lines being drawn are somewhat arbitrary.
The government insists that people pay taxes to facilitate a police force but not health care.
I would ask why? Where is this imaginary line that says the people have the right to be protected and served, without direct cost, as long as it’s not in a hospital?

“Somehow he has slid from defunding the police and allowing anarchy to rule the day to a defense of "low paying jobs".”
Again, it was a very simple thought experiment. It seems that you failed to grasp the basic mechanics of it. I don’t support disbanding the police in any way shape or form or allowing anarchy to rule the streets, but I like how you equate my advocacy of putting the right people in the right jobs as some kind of slippery slope toward lawlessness.
I mentioned “low paying jobs” because POVERTY is one of the leading predictors for criminality which is very much part and parcel of what the police seek to curtail.

“Here is a guy, demanding lawless mobs of violent leftist thugs be allowed to run the streets, attacking, killing or burning out people they disagree with.”
Erm..no. At absolutely no point did I make that suggestion.

“Along with his like-minded cronies he wants to shit on veterans for the crime of serving their nation, demands they are black balled from employment based of previous status as service members.”
And again, I said quite clearly that people should be selected on MERIT.
Why would I want to shit on a group of people who’ve been willing to risk their lives in defence of their nation? Really?

“Like his forefather's in NAZI Germany, Burkey would have them tattooed and forced to wear the modern Democrats version of a Star of David on their clothes.”
That’s some crazy shit right there.
Actually, Nazi Germany was a fascist state. Quite incompatible with “crazy leftist” ideals. But whatever.

“His version of "humanitarian values" is pretty appalling on it's face. This "humanitarian", fails to recognize that the vast majority of deaths in the black community are from violence they inflict on one another, so he blames the police. Burkey holds the police responsible for crime in minority communities by claiming they have far less crime and their problems stem from excessive police presence in their community.”
Erm...not quite sure how you got to that conclusion, but please continue to tell me what I believe.
I don’t blame the police for what’s happening in POOR communities. You seem to be very keen to conflate poverty with race. I can’t imagine why...

“Fun fact, if you had the skills to use Google, you could look it up for yourself. Uniform Crime Statistics are compiled by the DOJ. You might like this one. 53% of all murders in the country are committed by black-Americans, they make up 13% of the population. I know.......................I know........................you want to scream I'm racist for knowing a fact and telling you. Here is the best part, this is not a result of "Over-policing an oppressed minority", it is a result of Black people killing each other. 88% of these killing are black on black crimes, the other 12% are whites/Hispanics killing people, DOJ generally lumps us together for some reason, probably to get the "white" numbers up. “
Here a fun fact. If you search for a correlation of almost any kind, you’ll probably find one.
In other news, correlation doesn’t necessarily imply causation. Maybe there’s a range of reasons other than simply the colour of a persons skin that might contribute to statistical anomalies.


“Is it "over-policing"? I wonder, are white murder rates far higher and white people simply refuse to report murders in their community?”
Maybe poverty is the leading predictor for violent crime? Did you bother to look at that one or did you stop asking questions when you found answers that fit your narrative? I’m not even sure what you mean by “over-policing”.

I won’t even bother with the rest, I think the point is quite clearly made.

 

[Jetnoise]

Well I will never buy from ford again sorry ass mfers

Ford won't miss you as a customer....so you can sleep good tonight

 

[lonegunman]

Keep on back peddling Burkey......................peddle it back.

The only difference between you and the average NAZI in 1940 is they actually liked their country. As far as government control of the economy, government control of speech, media and thought, if the left wins the next election we will have it here. The left already is using its leftist internet companies

@lonegunman
Please allow me to break it down for you.

“I really like this glowing explanation of life as a leftist troll”
I wasn’t trolling, I was using YOUR kind of EXTREME language to show you what a dickhead you look like. Maybe that IS trolling?

“He admits he lies, conflates and distorts as if that makes his point correct.”
See above

“Few economies run a true Capitalist model but in his warped mind he tries to justify his distorted world view as some sort of honorable opposition of capitalism.”
I don’t oppose capitalism....i started quite clearly that I like capitalism BUT that it needs checks and balances. What an extreme left idea. Balance.

The police do not exist to protect "capitalism".
At no point did I say they did...
Who’s trolling now?
What I said was, if you allowed capitalism to reach it’s absolute conclusion, without any protections, literally everything would exist on a user pays system. Remember, it’s typically, the right who argue that they want less government intervention. It could easily be argued that FORCING people to pay for such services through their taxes, rather than giving them the option, is in fact some sort of over-governance. Again, it’s simply a thought-experiment to show that the lines being drawn are somewhat arbitrary.
The government insists that people pay taxes to facilitate a police force but not health care.
I would ask why? Where is this imaginary line that says the people have the right to be protected and served, without direct cost, as long as it’s not in a hospital?

“Somehow he has slid from defunding the police and allowing anarchy to rule the day to a defense of "low paying jobs".”
Again, it was a very simple thought experiment. It seems that you failed to grasp the basic mechanics of it. I don’t support disbanding the police in any way shape or form or allowing anarchy to rule the streets, but I like how you equate my advocacy of putting the right people in the right jobs as some kind of slippery slope toward lawlessness.
I mentioned “low paying jobs” because POVERTY is one of the leading predictors for criminality which is very much part and parcel of what the police seek to curtail.

“Here is a guy, demanding lawless mobs of violent leftist thugs be allowed to run the streets, attacking, killing or burning out people they disagree with.”
Erm..no. At absolutely no point did I make that suggestion.

“Along with his like-minded cronies he wants to shit on veterans for the crime of serving their nation, demands they are black balled from employment based of previous status as service members.”
And again, I said quite clearly that people should be selected on MERIT.
Why would I want to shit on a group of people who’ve been willing to risk their lives in defence of their nation? Really?

“Like his forefather's in NAZI Germany, Burkey would have them tattooed and forced to wear the modern Democrats version of a Star of David on their clothes.”
That’s some crazy shit right there.
Actually, Nazi Germany was a fascist state. Quite incompatible with “crazy leftist” ideals. But whatever.

“His version of "humanitarian values" is pretty appalling on it's face. This "humanitarian", fails to recognize that the vast majority of deaths in the black community are from violence they inflict on one another, so he blames the police. Burkey holds the police responsible for crime in minority communities by claiming they have far less crime and their problems stem from excessive police presence in their community.”
Erm...not quite sure how you got to that conclusion, but please continue to tell me what I believe.
I don’t blame the police for what’s happening in POOR communities. You seem to be very keen to conflate poverty with race. I can’t imagine why...

“Fun fact, if you had the skills to use Google, you could look it up for yourself. Uniform Crime Statistics are compiled by the DOJ. You might like this one. 53% of all murders in the country are committed by black-Americans, they make up 13% of the population. I know.......................I know........................you want to scream I'm racist for knowing a fact and telling you. Here is the best part, this is not a result of "Over-policing an oppressed minority", it is a result of Black people killing each other. 88% of these killing are black on black crimes, the other 12% are whites/Hispanics killing people, DOJ generally lumps us together for some reason, probably to get the "white" numbers up. “
Here a fun fact. If you search for a correlation of almost any kind, you’ll probably find one.
In other news, correlation doesn’t necessarily imply causation. Maybe there’s a range of reasons other than simply the colour of a persons skin that might contribute to statistical anomalies.


“Is it "over-policing"? I wonder, are white murder rates far higher and white people simply refuse to report murders in their community?”
Maybe poverty is the leading predictor for violent crime? Did you bother to look at that one or did you stop asking questions when you found answers that fit your narrative? I’m not even sure what you mean by “over-policing”.

I won’t even bother with the rest, I think the point is quite clearly made.

And suddenly we are supposed to believe you are okay with lower taxes, fully funding law enforcement, a thriving economy with low unemployment across all racial groups and streets free of leftist thugs burning and looting??????? That evil Trump was your favorite TV show until he decided to run for president. Your favorite leftist network paid him millions of dollars, Hillary begged him for money, so did Schumer as a matter of fact.

Because we had that until March and you hated it with a passion. We had a booming economy and low unemployment, lowest in the black community since records started being kept, you hated it. You hated it because black people not on welfare are roundly disliked by the left. No longer are they required to beg their Democrat master for food or housing or medical care.

So here we are with Burkey and his foreign flunkies about to melt down and say,"they never have said", any of the crap they have spewed in every political thread on the board. Your views and the views of a National socialist are extremely close, other than one critical point. They actually like their own country, you hate this one. The real mystery is why are you still here? With so many poverty free socialist utopias across the earth, a move to utopia is a simple plane ride away. Why not leave those of us who believe we should be able to own property and accumulate wealth alone?

You choose with a whine about "poverty" being the predictor of violent crime. Poverty is America is glorious and easy living. The "War on Poverty" has been waged for nearly 60 years, first started by some idiot democrat named Johnson. It might interest you to know taxpayers have spent $22,000,000,000,000.00 dollars since 1964 and guess what? There are just as many poor people today as in 1964. Today's poverty rate of 14.5% is the same as 1967.

But, poor people are living large baby.......................................................80% of "poor people" have air conditioning.

66% of poor people have cable or some other form of subscription television.

75% own their own car or truck......................ahh poor is tough. 33% have more than one vehicle.

82% of poor people say they, "have never been hungry". 98% of them have a home or apartment with a full kitchen including a microwave.

So what have Democrats bought with the "war on poverty", it is simple my leftist friend.............................you guys have all but destroyed the nuclear family. In 1964, a mere 7% of "poor children" were born out of wedlock. Today thru the hard work of the Democrats......................41% of "poor children" are born out of wedlock and grow up with no father. And to no one's surprise, children growing up in single parent homes are more likely to grow up to be criminals.


The day you feel so strongly about poverty in the black community that you drop off 50% of you ill gotten gains, monthly, at the nearest black church, call me back. You hate low taxes? Easy fix, simply pay more taxes. The IRS always accepts extra and if you designate it to reduce the national debt, they apply it directly to the debt. The mysteries are many with left wing idiots.

Why don't you volunteer to do what you so loudly believe in the internet? Why don't you refuse to call the police when you are in trouble? Simply call Black Lives Matter and explain the problem, leave law enforcement out of it. Why don't you move back to New York and fix that mess, pay those taxes and live by example?

Why ruin South Carolina? I am betting it is because your ideas are cancer and like a cancer, spreading them and destroying the body is all they do. You are a cancer, probably prostate cancer or colon cancer. A rotting sore on the ass of humanity. Communism/Socialism failed everywhere so far and has resulted in hundreds of millions of deaths because once it becomes apparent that it simply robs working people to fund dregs sitting on their asses it fails. You guys always start murdering people who object to being reduced to poverty and starved to death. Cancer.

 

[dogteam7]

Well I will never buy from ford again sorry ass mfers
https://www.lawenforcementtoday.com...tXgZNknR8YiNvEw--I167d3PY_R8Jpt7l4CRvJjZbq6Q0

This makes me want to buy more Fords! Nice to see that they get it! To the people who interpret “Defund the Police “ as “Do away with the Police “ it’s two different things. Stop whining, dry your little eyes and have somebody you know that’s smart explain it to you.

 

[Burkey]

Keep on back peddling Burkey......................peddle it back.

The only difference between you and the average NAZI in 1940 is they actually liked their country. As far as government control of the economy, government control of speech, media and thought, if the left wins the next election we will have it here. The left already is using its leftist internet companies


And suddenly we are supposed to believe you are okay with lower taxes, fully funding law enforcement, a thriving economy with low unemployment across all racial groups and streets free of leftist thugs burning and looting??????? That evil Trump was your favorite TV show until he decided to run for president. Your favorite leftist network paid him millions of dollars, Hillary begged him for money, so did Schumer as a matter of fact.

Because we had that until March and you hated it with a passion. We had a booming economy and low unemployment, lowest in the black community since records started being kept, you hated it. You hated it because black people not on welfare are roundly disliked by the left. No longer are they required to beg their Democrat master for food or housing or medical care.

So here we are with Burkey and his foreign flunkies about to melt down and say,"they never have said", any of the crap they have spewed in every political thread on the board. Your views and the views of a National socialist are extremely close, other than one critical point. They actually like their own country, you hate this one. The real mystery is why are you still here? With so many poverty free socialist utopias across the earth, a move to utopia is a simple plane ride away. Why not leave those of us who believe we should be able to own property and accumulate wealth alone?

You choose with a whine about "poverty" being the predictor of violent crime. Poverty is America is glorious and easy living. The "War on Poverty" has been waged for nearly 60 years, first started by some idiot democrat named Johnson. It might interest you to know taxpayers have spent $22,000,000,000,000.00 dollars since 1964 and guess what? There are just as many poor people today as in 1964. Today's poverty rate of 14.5% is the same as 1967.

But, poor people are living large baby.......................................................80% of "poor people" have air conditioning.

66% of poor people have cable or some other form of subscription television.

75% own their own car or truck......................ahh poor is tough. 33% have more than one vehicle.

82% of poor people say they, "have never been hungry". 98% of them have a home or apartment with a full kitchen including a microwave.

So what have Democrats bought with the "war on poverty", it is simple my leftist friend.............................you guys have all but destroyed the nuclear family. In 1964, a mere 7% of "poor children" were born out of wedlock. Today thru the hard work of the Democrats......................41% of "poor children" are born out of wedlock and grow up with no father. And to no one's surprise, children growing up in single parent homes are more likely to grow up to be criminals.


The day you feel so strongly about poverty in the black community that you drop off 50% of you ill gotten gains, monthly, at the nearest black church, call me back. You hate low taxes? Easy fix, simply pay more taxes. The IRS always accepts extra and if you designate it to reduce the national debt, they apply it directly to the debt. The mysteries are many with left wing idiots.

Why don't you volunteer to do what you so loudly believe in the internet? Why don't you refuse to call the police when you are in trouble? Simply call Black Lives Matter and explain the problem, leave law enforcement out of it. Why don't you move back to New York and fix that mess, pay those taxes and live by example?

Why ruin South Carolina? I am betting it is because your ideas are cancer and like a cancer, spreading them and destroying the body is all they do. You are a cancer, probably prostate cancer or colon cancer. A rotting sore on the ass of humanity. Communism/Socialism failed everywhere so far and has resulted in hundreds of millions of deaths because once it becomes apparent that it simply robs working people to fund dregs sitting on their asses it fails. You guys always start murdering people who object to being reduced to poverty and starved to death. Cancer.

Lol. You’re hilarious. First you tell me what I believe, then when I correct you (because they’re MY beliefs and you’re making a complete mess of it), I’m “back-pedalling”.
It’s no real surprise that you invoked Godwin’s law rather than attempt to form a coherent argument.

 

[lonegunman]

This makes me want to buy more Fords! Nice to see that they get it! To the people who interpret “Defund the Police “ as “Do away with the Police “ it’s two different things. Stop whining, dry your little eyes and have somebody you know that’s smart explain it to you.

Can you translate this sign for us? It seems like it means "do away with the police" but I only speak English. Remember when Republicans "abolished" slavery and stopped Democrats from owning other people?

abolish
verb
Save Word
To save this word, you'll need to log in.

Log In

abol·ish | \ ə-ˈbä-lish \
abolished; abolishing; abolishes
Definition of abolish


transitive verb

: to end the observance or effect of (something, such as a law) : to completely do away with (something) : ANNULabolish a law, abolish slavery

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dic...of abolish,Sentences Learn More about abolish

 

[lonegunman]

Lol. You’re hilarious. First you tell me what I believe, then when I correct you (because they’re MY beliefs and you’re making a complete mess of it), I’m “back-pedalling”.
It’s no real surprise that you invoked Godwin’s law rather than attempt to form a coherent argument.

I disagree but if that helps soothe your hate and justify your intolerance, think what you want.

I just compared your support for excluding people from full participation in society or employment based on their past condition of service in the military to your forefather's exclusion of people for their religion or skin color. Ending civil rights for people because you dislike their politics or military service is as discriminatory and hateful as when your father and grandfather did it for race and religion. Simple enough for you?


Cut bigger eye holes in your hood and it should be easier to read.

Sponsored