Ford GT Tails...

[Raul-7]

Nothing beats the original...

Sponsored

 

[JohnBoyNC]

x 10

 

[AR306]

If they were thinner, larger diameter and inside the trunk space/flush with the deck lid instead of protruding out the back of the car, I'd say it looked pretty cool.

 

[cbrookre]

Oh dear lord, make it stop! Those have Ricer written all over them...

 

[K-Roll302]

Nothing beats the original...

Except for the first redesign, in my opinion.

 

[Colleton]

Except for the first redesign, in my opinion.

Quoting for truth. That's such a beautiful body style, I was really hoping for a rear end like this when fastback was 1st mentioned in regard to the S550. In my mind, that's what a proper fastback should look like.

 

[WarrENDeatH]

x11

 

[WarrENDeatH]

Except for the first redesign, in my opinion.

Absolutely beautiful.

Shocking how close the s550 looks to it.

 

[Raul-7]

Except for the first redesign, in my opinion.

I agree; I have the 67 FB and its miles better than the 65; looks even better in person. But both are my favorite.

The 67 is the reason I don't have the new S550 Mustang...

 

[klumpikat]

.

 

[nastang87xx]

what if you got the rejection letter because you like getting rejected? like an addiction to pain, and you just rise above.

Like, "screw you ford GT program, I'm gonna be even more rich than those ford GT buyers and invest in a racing team to stomp your ass", that kind of man.

I would recommend more than a new car.

 

[pike1346]

Great looking lights.............just not on a Mustang :(

:amen:

 

[sk8erord]

Some things just can't be unseen... damn you all!

 

[JamesinLittleSilver]

I agree; I have the 67 FB and its miles better than the 65; looks even better in person. But both are my favorite.

The 67 is the reason I don't have the new S550 Mustang...

You should trade the Prius in for an EB, I tell myself it is pretty close gas mileage wise. Then you would have both.

 

[MyFirst5.0]

Sponsored