Sponsored

Finally got my GT Dynoed

TexasMetallic5.0

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2020
Threads
4
Messages
533
Reaction score
713
Location
Texas
Vehicle(s)
2018 GT, 2005 Ram 1500 4x4
OP
OP
TX5OH

TX5OH

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2020
Threads
6
Messages
104
Reaction score
47
Location
Texas
First Name
Nathan
Vehicle(s)
2016 Mustang GT Convertible
I donโ€™t have all the answers here. I am just saying your torque number most likely is not correct. Graph should look like this.
5EA81CC8-C791-49AE-84F8-4E5D9B24AEBE.jpeg

B12472B6-E85B-4C95-A4E0-F53CC1208485.jpeg

Notice rpm and tq cross at 5252.
My scaling it different for torque and hp. I get where it seems like an anomaly, but I have been using my engine software to work on designing my custom grind cam. I have benchmarked my software for various combinations and what intake, exhaust to use in the program. I have used actual head flow data, cam specs (including pulling my cam timing from my datalog to dial in my tune.) It is all in the tune of the cam timing. Once I put in my cam timing my curve lined up very good with my actual numbers. No correction factor needed in my analysis. Granted it comes out slightly less on the TQ, but still has 431 to the wheels. My thinking is if it was due to the 1.14 in the auto we would see this high torque on other autos as well. I emailed my tuner with my results and he said my torque and hp are close to what he normally gets. The car also runs extremely good especially with it weighing in a little over 4000 with a full tank of gas and me in it.

I have attached an overlay of my actual and predicted numbers.

Comparison to actual.webp
Sponsored

 
 








Top