The test stand Mustang built for us measures in Kilonewtons lolUnless you do KW/NM then 5250 is irrelevant. Haha.
My scaling it different for torque and hp. I get where it seems like an anomaly, but I have been using my engine software to work on designing my custom grind cam. I have benchmarked my software for various combinations and what intake, exhaust to use in the program. I have used actual head flow data, cam specs (including pulling my cam timing from my datalog to dial in my tune.) It is all in the tune of the cam timing. Once I put in my cam timing my curve lined up very good with my actual numbers. No correction factor needed in my analysis. Granted it comes out slightly less on the TQ, but still has 431 to the wheels. My thinking is if it was due to the 1.14 in the auto we would see this high torque on other autos as well. I emailed my tuner with my results and he said my torque and hp are close to what he normally gets. The car also runs extremely good especially with it weighing in a little over 4000 with a full tank of gas and me in it.I donโt have all the answers here. I am just saying your torque number most likely is not correct. Graph should look like this.![]()
![]()
Notice rpm and tq cross at 5252.