Grimmer
Well-Known Member
- Thread starter
- #1
I have a specific question related to octane, but don't want to start yet another octane thread... Here goes, let's see what we can get:
I'm Looking at the Ford Performance Racing Power Pack 2. All of the FPR tunes require the use of 91 octane minimum (instead of the published 87 octane minimum). In my locale we are at about 4,700 feet above sea level. The common gasoline options are: 85, 89, 91 and 88 ethanol free. There is also one station in town that pumps 91 octane ethanol free but at nearly double the cost ($4.00+ vs $2.30 for reference).
My previous car took a 20% loss of fuel economy when the "up to" 10% ethanol was added to all the fuel around here. Hence my desire to use the ethanol free option (if possible). It is commonly held that high altitude effectively lowers the octane requirement a bit (although there is a specific CYA style warning against this in the owner's manual).
So here's the question: Is 4,700 feet of altitude enough to allow running the 88 octane ethanol free in a canned tune that requires 91 octane at sea level?
I suspect the drop from 91 to 88 (3 octane lower) is too great since the common blends around here are only 2 octane lower (85 vs 87, 91 vs 93); however, it is only different by 1...
Any thoughts?
I'm Looking at the Ford Performance Racing Power Pack 2. All of the FPR tunes require the use of 91 octane minimum (instead of the published 87 octane minimum). In my locale we are at about 4,700 feet above sea level. The common gasoline options are: 85, 89, 91 and 88 ethanol free. There is also one station in town that pumps 91 octane ethanol free but at nearly double the cost ($4.00+ vs $2.30 for reference).
My previous car took a 20% loss of fuel economy when the "up to" 10% ethanol was added to all the fuel around here. Hence my desire to use the ethanol free option (if possible). It is commonly held that high altitude effectively lowers the octane requirement a bit (although there is a specific CYA style warning against this in the owner's manual).
So here's the question: Is 4,700 feet of altitude enough to allow running the 88 octane ethanol free in a canned tune that requires 91 octane at sea level?
I suspect the drop from 91 to 88 (3 octane lower) is too great since the common blends around here are only 2 octane lower (85 vs 87, 91 vs 93); however, it is only different by 1...
Any thoughts?
Sponsored