Sponsored

Don't let this turn into another octane thread...

Grimmer

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 31, 2016
Threads
20
Messages
542
Reaction score
238
Location
Utah
Vehicle(s)
2016 GT/CS M6
I have a specific question related to octane, but don't want to start yet another octane thread... Here goes, let's see what we can get:

I'm Looking at the Ford Performance Racing Power Pack 2. All of the FPR tunes require the use of 91 octane minimum (instead of the published 87 octane minimum). In my locale we are at about 4,700 feet above sea level. The common gasoline options are: 85, 89, 91 and 88 ethanol free. There is also one station in town that pumps 91 octane ethanol free but at nearly double the cost ($4.00+ vs $2.30 for reference).

My previous car took a 20% loss of fuel economy when the "up to" 10% ethanol was added to all the fuel around here. Hence my desire to use the ethanol free option (if possible). It is commonly held that high altitude effectively lowers the octane requirement a bit (although there is a specific CYA style warning against this in the owner's manual).

So here's the question: Is 4,700 feet of altitude enough to allow running the 88 octane ethanol free in a canned tune that requires 91 octane at sea level?

I suspect the drop from 91 to 88 (3 octane lower) is too great since the common blends around here are only 2 octane lower (85 vs 87, 91 vs 93); however, it is only different by 1...

Any thoughts?
Sponsored

 

NoVaGT

Banned
Banned
Banned
Joined
Sep 29, 2016
Threads
115
Messages
5,621
Reaction score
4,377
Location
Northern Virginia
Vehicle(s)
2019 PP1 GT Kona
I ONLY USE 93 OCTANE!!!! IF YOU DON'T USE 93 OCTANE YOU'RE A MORON!!!! ONLY I KNOW WHAT I'M TALKING ABOUT EVERYONE ELSE IS WRONG!!!!



That felt good......

Now, OP, what was the question???
 

whalesalad

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 30, 2016
Threads
38
Messages
433
Reaction score
241
Location
Costa Mesa, CA
Vehicle(s)
2016 GT PP
I'd probably avoid a canned tune in your situation. If your altitude requires a different octane then I'd find a tuner who has experience with that situation.

Or blow the hell out of it and the altitude difference won't matter so much :D
 

SpeedLu

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 13, 2016
Threads
11
Messages
1,972
Reaction score
971
Location
some swamp
Vehicle(s)
2020 Premium PP1 Mustang GT, 2017 F-150 Platinum FX4
If the tune calls for 91, fill up with 91. Don't overthink it.
 

ShelbyGT350

Shelby GT350
Joined
Oct 22, 2013
Threads
31
Messages
371
Reaction score
84
Location
Escondido, CA
Vehicle(s)
1970 Mach 1 351C Shaker
My local independent station has unleaded 87, 95 and 100 octane gas (Sunoco brand). Hopefully I won't blow my engine with the high-octane stuff! FYI, the latter 2 grades are $7.50 and $8.50/gallon!
 

Sponsored

markmurfie

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2015
Threads
15
Messages
1,320
Reaction score
625
Location
Hawaii
First Name
Mark
Vehicle(s)
2015 Ford Mustang GT
It's all about the stoichiometric value of the fuel. The stock ECU is based off 14.08 which is the value for E10. Then it works in lambda so no matter what fuel you run it thinks it e10 and will run the same volume. If you use e85 it runs to lean and is bad for the engine. With out changing to the 14.7 stoich value of pure gasoline I don't think you will gain MPGs. In fact it will run rich and you may lose MPG.

I think you should look into a flex fuel tune so that no matter the fuel you get it's full benefit. Make sure your tuner knows you will be running pure gasoline.

Yes for best fuel mileage use pure gasoline.
 

jasonstang

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2015
Threads
23
Messages
5,571
Reaction score
1,307
Location
Denver, CO
Vehicle(s)
2017 GB GT/CS 6MT
So, this is how I am looking at it.
At sea level, air pressure is roughly 14.7psi, given engine compression of 11:1, at greatest pressure is gonna be 162psi. Say anything higher than that will cause knocking.
At 4700ft, the air pressure is about 12.4psi, so with 11:1 compression ratio, you are looking at 136.4psi.
Now we bring the max high altitude psi to sea level to calculate the relative compression ratio 136.4:14.7 = 9.3:1.
The engine will always try to inject the right amount of gas given air volume from the MAF. Assuming the tune is premium gas only at sea level, you engine is effectively working as 9.3:1 compression ratio at sea level which should be fine with 88 octane at your altitude.
 

WhiteyDog

WOOF!!!
Joined
Jun 30, 2016
Threads
16
Messages
1,788
Reaction score
733
Location
Manheim, Pa.
Vehicle(s)
16
I ONLY USE 93 OCTANE!!!! IF YOU DON'T USE 93 OCTANE YOU'RE A MORON!!!! ONLY I KNOW WHAT I'M TALKING ABOUT EVERYONE ELSE IS WRONG!!!!



That felt good......

Now, OP, what was the question???
:lol::lol::lol::lol: :lol::lol:
 

GTBOB

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 27, 2015
Threads
37
Messages
1,304
Reaction score
623
Location
Fairfield Township, OHIO
First Name
Bob
Vehicle(s)
'18 GT, Royal Crimson, 10 speed, Active Exhaust
Vehicle Showcase
1
I run half a tank of diesel with 1 gallon of Seafoam/1 gallon of Roundup weed and grass killer for the past year. Runs fine at any altitude. Hasn't been a recorded case of bed bugs in my township since.
 

18psi

of boost
Joined
Dec 10, 2015
Threads
48
Messages
489
Reaction score
113
Location
Best Coast
Vehicle(s)
2021
My car on a Lund FF tune knocked from 5k to redline on CA 91oct. Lund pulled out timing, and it still knocked. I tried different stations, and it still knocked. I added a couple gallons of e85 and poof knock disappeared. Sometimes even 91 is not enough.

He said if he was to take away any more timing, it wouldn't even make any power over the factory tune.

The point is, if you want power you need octane for knock suppression. Otherwise you either don't make any more power, or risk damage to your engine. Playing science lab with your car is probably not going to result in anything good either. This is also another reason why I think it's insane not to have the ability to monitor/log your car's health with some of these "tuning solutions".
 
OP
OP
Grimmer

Grimmer

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 31, 2016
Threads
20
Messages
542
Reaction score
238
Location
Utah
Vehicle(s)
2016 GT/CS M6
It's all about the stoichiometric value of the fuel. The stock ECU is based off 14.08 which is the value for E10. Then it works in lambda so no matter what fuel you run it thinks it e10 and will run the same volume.
I have recently tried running the E0 gas. Although my "data set" is not very big yet, it appears early on that I will not get any additional fuel economy as you mentioned. It seems that running the more expensive E0-88 is not likely to get me any gains over the E10-91 like it did in my previous car (which was likely setup/tuned for the E0).
Sponsored

 
 








Top