ctandc72
Well-Known Member
The point blew right by you. From the mid 70's until the late 90's, the auto industry's progression for emissions controls made a ridiculously large jump in regards to efficiency. In fact a lot of the progression in these jumps were in fact due to making engines run more efficiently via highly regulate EFI systems and faster ECU and feedbacks systems. Why did auto manufacturers stop using AIR / Thermactor systems in the late 90's for the most part? FYI these systems used an engine driven pump to push air into the exhaust / catalytic converter to increase the converter's efficiency and help the lifespan of the converter. Modern converters don't need this air injection anymore - in large part because of the efficiency of modern closed loop EFI systems.Um. No. It's not. Smog levels in places like Los Angeles and San Jose are MUCH better today because of those 60s, 70s, and 80s, pollution control devices on cars. Are the devices better today? Duh. Does that mean earlier devices were worthless? Hardly.
The point? There isn't much left in regards to increasing efficiency when it comes to IC engines in mass-produced, affordable vehicles. Diminishing returns.
Again - did you read my post?Because we have more cars on the road? California has almost as many registered vehicles (15M) as the next two highest States (Texas and Florida, 8M each) combined.
Wildfires are a very large contributor to smog / air quality levels in CA.
The warm climate in CA also contributes as well as the terrain of the state itself.
Industrial pollution is a big factor in CA. I guess car emissions are responsible for over half of CA's bodies of fresh water not meeting EPA Clean water standards in 2011?
Are you telling me that you believe industrial pollution in CA is not a factor?
Again - where did I state the introduction of the catalytic converter didn't play a large part in the initial large improvement in air quality in many densely populated CA cities?With respect to places like Los Angeles and San Jose, entirely wrong. The improvement in air quality since the 50s, 60s, and 70s, is largely attributed by many authorities to the invention of the catalytic converter.
See that's the thing. California got a WAIVER to enforce stricter emissions controls 40+ years ago - because the smog and air pollution in CA was so bad. And California officials in many respects just assume they can legislate and do what they want, regardless of Federal laws and standards. The waiver was yanked.Look, sorry if Californians buy more cars than any other state, and auto manufactures are too cheap to make models for other markets. California does what California thinks is right for California. Your problem is really with the auto makers, and YOUR state. If you think California emission standards are too strict, get YOUR state to pass a law that says only federal emission standard cars can be imported and sold there.
CA's smog system is absolutely ridiculous. CARB Certification is worse than "Microsoft approved" back just a few years ago.
Please tell me how the "Smog exempt" laws work in CA?
But seriously, I don't care what CA does. But apparently a lot of Californians (well former Californians) do - since they've been fleeing the state for years. The point is that CA is pushing ridiculous goals that essentially end up doing more damage in the long run than anything.
If you believe for a second that the main motivator in California's "leading the way" in regards to "Green" living - see recycling - is anything other than profit - you're missing the forest for the trees. Trucking trash and refuse out of state - paying companies to take it - doesn't magically make all that crap go away.
Sponsored