HoosierDaddy
Well-Known Member
- Thread starter
- #1
Don't know why I thought of this today but really had me scratching my head when I installed this.
A while back I installed a bidet toilet seat. They need their own water source and all I've seen just T off the existing line where it connects to the toilet. Every other brand I looked at put the T where the house line went into the toilet. Made perfect sense, only one new hose that only needs to be a few inches to the new seat.
But the one I went with for other reasons, put the T at the other end of the line right at the shutoff. That meant a very long hose to the seat, not to mention opens the possibility whatever length hose that came with the seat it might be too short. Likewise, I've seen older homes with no removable hose after the shutoff. So this could not be installed with that scenario either without having to replace the valve and everything after it. Plus this design requires both ends of the existing hose to be disconnected meaning twice the chance of leaks.
Picture below. Does anyone have a clue why a company (one of the best sellers) would make these choices that increased their costs (extra hose AND longer hoses), results in worse aesthetics (numerous longer hoses), and makes it more difficult to install? I know the bean counters and marketing had to hate this, but what overrode them?
Every other brand/model I saw simply put the T where the arrow below starts and runs a short new hose following the arrow. This seat added every single hose you see.
A while back I installed a bidet toilet seat. They need their own water source and all I've seen just T off the existing line where it connects to the toilet. Every other brand I looked at put the T where the house line went into the toilet. Made perfect sense, only one new hose that only needs to be a few inches to the new seat.
But the one I went with for other reasons, put the T at the other end of the line right at the shutoff. That meant a very long hose to the seat, not to mention opens the possibility whatever length hose that came with the seat it might be too short. Likewise, I've seen older homes with no removable hose after the shutoff. So this could not be installed with that scenario either without having to replace the valve and everything after it. Plus this design requires both ends of the existing hose to be disconnected meaning twice the chance of leaks.
Picture below. Does anyone have a clue why a company (one of the best sellers) would make these choices that increased their costs (extra hose AND longer hoses), results in worse aesthetics (numerous longer hoses), and makes it more difficult to install? I know the bean counters and marketing had to hate this, but what overrode them?
Every other brand/model I saw simply put the T where the arrow below starts and runs a short new hose following the arrow. This seat added every single hose you see.
Sponsored