Mustang1878
Well-Known Member
- Thread starter
- #1
No.Lol, has he really just tried to warrant the buying of a 30-40k car based on if a 90 year old can go shopping in it?
Somewhat, he does state that it's more resonable for going shopping in and getting in and out of if you have elderly family, i doubt you'd drive your family in either to be quite honest, some might (like the post above) but nobody is really buying them as taxi's/chauffer cars are they :lol:.No.
His copy is perfectly reasonable. He has a d1ck of an editor who has read the first para and made up some stupid head/strap lines. The sort of people who reverse a pic because it looks better on the page.
Well with that choice I'd stick with the muscle/sports car :lol:the Mustang is a Pong/muscle/sports car (not debating which)
He didn't make a comparison. He said last week I had a Mustang, this week I have a 4x4. It's a point of conversation that his Mum found getting in and out of an SUV easier than the Mustang; not a back to back test.Somewhat, he does state that it's more resonable for going shopping in and getting in and out of if you have elderly family, i doubt you'd drive your family in either to be quite honest, some might (like the post above) but nobody is really buying them as taxi's/chauffer cars are they :lol:.
It's an incredibly silly comparrison to make between two cars that are obviously of two completley different target markets, the Mustang is a Pong/muscle/sports car (not debating which), the GLA is a small SUV, like the Juke, they're meant to have more room. It's like saying, 'The VW Caddy beats the LaFerarri inside out' because Dave the builder can fit all his tools in his caddy but not the LaFerarri... Useless comparrisons. :headbonk: