Funny, the 2010 new generation Camaro went up against an old Mustang generation that was already 5 years into production, but that did not keep the GM fanboys from bragging about outselling the Mustang in that year. Hypocrite much? But, hey, at least it's becoming clear who the Camaro trolls are on the board.
carefull about celebrating too early, remember this is GM! Recently they have a knack of "revising" numbers after hitting lots
I don't know one person who based their car-buying decision on what a magazine had to say. I can only hope people buying cars are not that naive.
Magazines will always say the top of the segment is the car to get.
Someone may have tree'd me on it, but here's one I read the other day:
It's one tool people use to make their decisions to deny that is....:shrug:
Its not a very good tools to use. Magazines never get the best times. People should go to the forums and see real world results how they are doing in whatever type of racing that interests them. People that care about magazine racing and leaving their cars stock use this to help them decide.
While I would agree that most of them do not get the best times. But testing the cars on the same day, on the same track, with the same driver is going to give you a pretty good idea of how they stack.
The cancellation of the Camaro in 2003 was deeply traumatic to the Bowtie faithful..so much so I think they cannot handle nearly ANY less than amazing news about the car.
i could not agree more. And this is what scares me about the pricing of the SS. It did not bother me, because to me, its worth every penny. But to some, it may not be.
For me..the pricing of a new SS is outside of my comfort level..hell even the base GT is tickling the edges.
