Stupid. Demonstration of how bizarre and wrong our intellectual property laws are. This should be a Trade Mark not a patent. A patent should "do" something novel or non-obvious or solve a specific problem. Cosmetic differences between cars should not be patent-able, but these days corporations patent everything.Cool keepsake
Not everything. I doubt GM is patenting the 2019 Camaro design.Stupid. Demonstration of how bizarre and wrong our intellectual property laws are. This should be a Trade Mark not a patent. A patent should "do" something novel or non-obvious or solve a specific problem. Cosmetic differences between cars should not be patent-able, but these days corporations patent everything.
Nah, not everything is patentable. This is a design patent, and completely legit. I have another type of patent for a chemical formulation. It is important to protect intellectual property, even if it just a novel automotive design.Stupid. Demonstration of how bizarre and wrong our intellectual property laws are. This should be a Trade Mark not a patent. A patent should "do" something novel or non-obvious or solve a specific problem. Cosmetic differences between cars should not be patent-able, but these days corporations patent everything.
Nothing stupid about it.Stupid. Demonstration of how bizarre and wrong our intellectual property laws are. This should be a Trade Mark not a patent. A patent should "do" something novel or non-obvious or solve a specific problem. Cosmetic differences between cars should not be patent-able, but these days corporations patent everything.
I always have to laugh when I see that “Land Wind” knockoff.I suspect it's also to try and prevent certain Chinese companies producing a very similar car.