2016 Auto dyno results

[Slamdcoop0428]

Went to a local dyno shop in fort Myers Florida with sick03L to dyno our cars.

The dyno is a mustang dyno but wasn't expecting anything crazy, just to get a baseline with my mods.

2016 gt automatic:
JLT intake
Pypes longtubes no cats
Borla s type cat back
Lund flex fuel tune - Ngauge was showing 76% for alcohol

Car made 411whp 371TQ

Happy to see the results.

Sponsored

 

[jasonstang]

411whp is pretty good.

 

[StoplightWarrior]

I know dyno's vary, but I would expect you to be higher given the LTs, no cats...

I have intake/xpipe/axleback/tune, and would hope to be around 410rwhp with my auto...but maybe I'm lower...


On another note, I also had a 2008 LS3 c6. Made 426rwhp with bolt ons. That was a fun car! I wish our Stangs weren't so heavy!

 

[Slamdcoop0428]

I know dyno's vary, but I would expect you to be higher given the LTs, no cats...

I have intake/xpipe/axleback/tune, and would hope to be around 410rwhp with my auto...but maybe I'm lower...


On another note, I also had a 2008 LS3 c6. Made 426rwhp with bolt ons. That was a fun car! I wish our Stangs weren't so heavy!

Yeah it's a mustang dyno though so typically 10% lower than a dyno jet, but they are much more accurate with how they calculate a number. I only made 413whp but had a slight pull on sick03L manual car that made 421whp when we raced prior to going to the dyno.

 

[PowerAdderGT]

Id say thats pretty good numbers, now take her to the track.

 

[craigsix]

I know dyno's vary, but I would expect you to be higher given the LTs, no cats...

I have intake/xpipe/axleback/tune, and would hope to be around 410rwhp with my auto...but maybe I'm lower...


On another note, I also had a 2008 LS3 c6. Made 426rwhp with bolt ons. That was a fun car! I wish our Stangs weren't so heavy!

id say you havent seen too many auto dynos.

 

[yellowstangatl]

My auto dynoed 391 with catback, FF tune with e85 and Steeda CAI. Adding Longtubes this weekend so I hope to see similar numbers to you.

 

[StoplightWarrior]

id say you havent seen too many auto dynos.

I know Auto's used to be dogs (I've owned several over the years), but was hearing that they are actually faster than manuals in the 5.0s, Camaros, and Vettes now. Figured that the drivetrain loss between autos/manuals was better than it used to be

 

[Sick03L]

Great #s for the car esp on the MD and being an auto. I'm still impressed. Not to mention your car rolls out nice.

 

[Sick03L]

My auto dynoed 391 with catback, FF tune with e85 and Steeda CAI. Adding Longtubes this weekend so I hope to see similar numbers to you.

On a mustang dyno or dyno jet?

 

[Enzo]

usually this car gets 380rwhp, and the intake and tune promise almost 30rwhp, i would expect it would make more then 411whp, but none the less its very good power.

 

[Sick03L]

usually this car gets 380rwhp, and the intake and tune promise almost 30rwhp, i would expect it would make more then 411whp, but none the less its very good power.

Yes.. on a dyno jet. Not a mustang dyno which is what we dyno'd on. They show much lower #s.

 

[Enzo]

Yes.. on a dyno jet. Not a mustang dyno which is what we dyno'd on. They show much lower #s.

Oh okay, i remember reading before the mustang dynos are lower on the numbers. dynojet would probably put out 450rwhp+

 

[Slamdcoop0428]

I want to put it on a dyno jet for the hell of it

 

[1320']

Dynojet to brag with big numbers, tune on Mustang Dyno's for results.

If you put down over 400WHP on a stingy Mustang dyno..that'll raise some eyebrows ;)

Sponsored