thePill
Camaro5's Most Wanted
- Joined
- Aug 13, 2012
- Threads
- 37
- Messages
- 6,561
- Reaction score
- 699
- Location
- Pittsburgh
- Vehicle(s)
- S550
- Thread starter
- #451
WINNING!!!
Sponsored
I was so blown away, by both the car and the driving, that I fired off a few questions to GM's press and PR contacts. This is what I got in return. I didn't chop the blatant propaganda, I'll leave you to filter that out for yourself...
From Adam Dean, Chassis Development Engineer for GM, and driver for that lap.
1) What did you think when those rain drops hit the windscreen? What crossed your mind?
It had rained earlier that afternoon and parts of the track were still damp/drying in places. The weather reports suggested we had a small window of dry conditions at the end of the day, but we knew there was still a risk of rain. As the rain appeared on the windscreen, the immediate thought was to assess the amount of available grip. Due to overcast skies and limited contrast it was not clear if it was only starting to rain - or had been raining for some time in that section. Fortunately, the chassis tuning of the Z/28 allows good feedback of change in surface grip. The aerodynamics and tire package, as well as the highly optimized braking system on the Z/28 are confidence-inspiring behind the wheel, even as the conditions change.
2) Did you ever consider backing off and quitting the hot lap? If not, why not?
I am comfortable driving in wet conditions, as our testing is expected to explore this range of vehicle usage. At high speed with our aerodynamics package, the vehicle is very stable even in the wet. There was no doubt that we wanted to finish the lap with as much pace as the surface would allow. There was additional motivation to complete the lap - as we had been hampered with less than ideal conditions for each day leading up to this video lap. I can admit to "backing off" going under the bridge toward Tiergarten - mostly due to not knowing how wet that section of road had become. The rain would have generated from the northwest, suggesting the remaining portion of track could be more wet.
3) How would you describe the experience of piloting a 7.0ltr muscle car around the old Nordschleife? Easy? Difficult? Why?
Relatively easy, believe it or not. This car was bred for the track. Much of the chassis content unique to the Z/28 work to help tame a daunting circuit like the Nordschleife; for instance 305/30ZR 19 Pirelli PZero Trofeo R tires or the Brembo Carbon Ceramic Matrix brake kit. Besides, the LS7 makes an enjoyable soundtrack to listen to when making laps!
4) Do you like testing at the NĂĽrburgring Nordschleife? What would be your favourite track/road (that's not the 'ring) to drive the Z/28?
Absolutely, there are many reasons to like testing at the Nordschleife. Within the U.S., one I always like to visit is Virginia International Raceway. It offers challenges (to both vehicle and driver) that are world class and one in which the Z/28 really shines.
Yeah, some pretty crazy stuff happened last week. Nothing that I hadn't warned about almost two years ago but, whatever... Since then, pretty much all talk of Nurburgring has ceased, lap time talk has become rare and talk of z28 in general has become tight lipped... It appears that the 2014 z28 will indeed be close to $70,000... It will be more expensive than an optioned out ZL1 convertible and then some...Been away for a while and got caught up yesterday & today. All I'm going to say is that it's been a very interesting read.
First off, he is handing it to the GT500... That is a good start. However, he goes into defense mode and defends Chevy's strange behavior. If the clock Chevy overlaid is out of sync then I would understand but, the video of the z28 starts at the start line BUT ends 1/2 a second early... On the ZL1's run the clock starts late but ends at the finish line. If the clock was out of sync it would have started late, finished late or started early, finished early... Don't cheat me Chevy, I am tired of it. If the data collecting equipment Chevy used was so precise, it would have started and stopped on the start and finish lines like normal testing equipment. Bold they were to just let that video go public but remember what thePill told ya', they were having trouble beating the ZL1's Ring time. They needed a time to publish before bad weather pushed hot laps back till April. It would have been bad for marketing but, was this alternative better? They also published Milford laps at 80% with a media ride along passenger... Still managing to beat the GT500's supposed time THEY got. It's strange only Team Camaro cannot produce a good lap time from the GT500...LOL....
Where does one begin on this. Sure I'll hand it to the GT500....it performs damn good.
But first off the time stand was added to this video. I understand the guy that added the timestamp says he carefully did it to help ensure accuracy...but still. You can't take this as official. No way.
Next....the guy is suggesting that GM may have fudged their times a bit based on what he found trying to put these videos together?? How desperate sounding is that?
They claim Ford "doesn't care" about ring times, and neither do they....yet in the very same thread they are making all of these exaggerations. Ridiculous.
Again...not putting down the Shelby....just this LOL of a thread.
Ford was sitting on a great Ring time for the last 18 months, they could very well be sitting on a better one still... How does it make you feel now knowing the GT500 can run a lap just as fast as the ZL1 and z28? Next up, Ford didn't give them a Boss 302... Do you know why that might be? Chevy themselves only sanctioned the 1LE in SCCA T2 where only the 5.0 GT runs. Ford did not tell them to do that... In SCCA T2, the 1LE cannot compete with the Base GT (Not Brembo GT) in which it finished 21st this season and quit half way through... It finished behind 7 5.0 GT's. The 5.0 GT won the SCCA T2 Runoff in it's maiden season... The 1LE finished 16th and 21st... You can't get the Boss until you beat the GT brother... The MSRP is closer to the GT than the Boss 302 as well, the Track Pack GT and 1LE are both between $36-$40,000. The GT dominates the 1LE in it's only sanctioned class.If anyone really believes that Ford is "sitting" on a better Ring time than the ZL1 they are the definition of gullible. Just like they Ford wouldn't let the magazines have a Boss to compare to the 1LE because the GT track pack was the better comparison. Too awesomely funny
Yes, the GT500 did pretty much split the comparisons 50/50 between the itself and the ZL1. Second, we are always skeptical of Nurburgring times. Roll bars/cages, Hot tunes, shaved tires, weight reduction... who knows what else... No need to publish a time if ANY of that stuff is present.First
Some realization here.
TRUE!!! The distance between the 2014 z28, the 2012 ZL1 and 2013 GT500 at Nurburgring is about 200 feet. The GT500 finishes about 100 feet behind the z28 and 100 feet in front of the ZL1. A different day would alter the results at a 13 mile track with a 4 second window. 4 seconds at Laguna Seca is another story.My opinion, that track is so long, that being within a few seconds of each other means nothing. Few seconds could be difference in one driver braking 2 feet earlier prior to half the turns on the 150+ turns at that track. Not only that, you can see how much better controlled the ZL1 is during the whole lap. The GT500 seems to make up the ground only on the power sections of the track. Still impressive for a car with smaller tires and live rear though.
I wouldn't be surprised if it ran a fast time. The GT500 did beat the ZL1 around a few tracks. Add in the straights were the ZL1 ran down the Z/28 and that GT500 does the same but even faster.
Second
If they are skeptical of GMs times, then they cannot take this seriously at all.
The GT500 cannot be mathced in the straights and looks to be almost on par with the ZL1 in some of the turns. That said, imagine the GT500 in something other than Goodyears (the ZL1 too). Keep the current tire size just change the rubber. The GT500 can make up the corners... the ZL1 nor the z28 can make up the straight line speed and acceleration. The new GT350 will be rather difficult to deal with if the z28 remains unchanged when it is released.I'm not really sure why this is surprising to anyone. The 500 has such a huge advantage in power and weight that it's straight line speeds can make up for it's lack of grip into the corners. In regards to the Z-28, Ford's answer will be soon with the release of the next generation GT350/500 which will ride on a completely new suspension.
Watching the side by side video you can see the ZL1 is quicker in the tight S's, but the 500 pours it on in the straights.
It's going to be a sad day in here as The Ring time, was the crowned jewel of the forum.
Okay now, the GT500 dominates the 1/4 mile (capable both faster and quicker). Lap times were 50/50, the GT500 winning at Laguna Seca (Super short track) where I thought the ZL1 would of had it (capable both faster and quicker). They split the road course wins 50/50, the GT500 won at short and medium tracks... I am betting Ford still has a Tanner video of a convertible '13 GT500 beating the ZL1 coupes lap time Chevy reported... BET ME!!! Now, The GT500 has just possibly beat the ZL1's fastest Nurburgring lap. It was quicker because it produced a quicker time even though SID chose to start and stop his timer on the start and finish lines. Chevy decided to cut the clock short on both the ZL1 and z28 runs... Why cheat?The GT500 being capable of ZL1 times and the GT500 being faster than the ZL1 are two totally different things though. I'm not saying it's not capable - I'm saying it's not faster.
Changing the brake fluid is a possibility... at these speeds it is a probability on all sides. Another reason Nurburgring shouldn't be used as a yard stick of lap times.My guess is that they changed the brake fluid to DOT 4 just like the owners manual suggests to do when racing, just like I'm sure they did the 1,500 mile break-in and diff service on the ZL1 as per the owners manual before sending it on the track.
In independent testing DOT 4 fluid has been proven to cure the GT500's brake fade issues.
Actually Fender, the GT500's (both the Blue one in the Ring lap and the White one) were the first OEM '13 GT500's that ran the Ring. The "winglet" GT500 you are referring too was actually a '10-'12 bodied 500 we called "Red". "Red" was a prototype that was producing 7:30 Ring laps and was quite possibly the exact car that did 202mph at Nardo. Red was later said to be the possible GT500KR that was never released. I now speculate that Ford did not need for an additional "KR" model because one wasn't needed. It's obvious now that Ford had an impressive Ring time the entire time and just never said a word... Other than Jamaal's "Deep Sevens" comment at the LA Autoshow in November 2012.Eh, it's fast. But the GT500 that ran the ring was different than the final car. Remember the nose winglets? In any case, I don't buy into any "ring time. Just marketing hype, with too many variables.
__________________
It's amazing that it's "supposedly" 1 second faster. That's right 1 second not 2...
If you're gonna BS people go for the whole enchilada.
The first video Ford releases of Nurburgring EVER and he is waving the BS flag pretty hard. He's actually waving the BS flag because he was one of the major players in the "Where's that Ring time" and now its all gone. After seeing the video, he should go back, rewatch Chevy's Camaro press releases and apply his current mentality to Team Camaro's "proof".Go to SVT and read it...it's total BS!
Caged, stripped, tires suspension... pretty much every Camaro that has run the Ring and published a lap time.Great video, but I learned nothing from it. I don't think there could be a more vague representation of the car on the video. We know it's a mustang, that's about it. Caged? Stripped? Tires? Suspension? Who know what was done to that car to get those times.
Nice run anyway.
Again, you are comparing editor runs using 4-6 different drivers, over the span of a week and comparing results from different years. Lightning Laps are done IN traffic and the last two years have had rain on 2-3 of the 5 days of driving. Your gospel and real life are far from similar. The 1LE can't handle a 5.0 GT in the real world, don't you worry about the 500 please.Now a days ford fans are desperate they will come out with these UFO like stories of a shelby doing that time at the ring. No possible chance it ran that fast at the ring. Ford hasnt released anything since the actual time is plain embaressing. VIR anyone? Oh that s right, a 1LE almost spanked it.
Blue level Joe, Red level was never produced. Red level was more than likely going to be the GT500KR. It was instantly identifiable with it's drilled rotors.Also, as was mentioned on your favored site sometime back by our mutual friend (the one so concerned currently about the Z/28's non-conformity to sanctioning bodies' rules), wasn't a Blue GT 500 timed by his German-based friends running "mid-7:40s" while Big Red (the winglet-wearing car you displayed here) equipped with a full measure of the FRPP catalog timed running "into the 7:30's"?
2) So, to what standard was Sid's video game star equipped and prepared? Blue-level, or Red-line? Or is that information known, and shareable?
No, no Chance... The video was likely "slipped" due to Team Camaro's recent perversions of lap time recently. The Milford Media blooper got the ball rolling. Advertising YOUR companies time with the competitions car is okay I guess. Advertising a time, a sandbagged time is just wrong... Here is the video of Camaro5's personal ride along. Then I will post a video of the GT500 running Nurburgring. I will also post an extra media video from Milford in which the driver states its an 80% run... still beating the GT500's 1:59.93.Car company's live through marketing. Ford did an hour long infomercial on the Boss as it was being released citing its track prowess. If ANY company has a means to positively market their product they'll do it.
Bottom line that manufactured write up and video is pure Koolaid!
...and I am misinformed...Even if the information provided is accurate, the GT500 is not a production vehicle, the Z28 is.
Did you see how C&D did the lap? Is C&D results more valuable knowing they are done by 4-6 different EDITORS, over the span of 5 days, in traffic and then you compare them to years passed results. Both the Fiat 500 and GT500 had rain during their lap, the Boss had just as much rain as the z28 did in it's Ring lap at VIR. Nobody cried... until now... Randy is the only driver that discussed brake fade, it's possibly that he is seasoned enough to feel the difference or, there was an issue with THAT car.Considering the ZL1 is 3 seconds faster as per Car and Driver's Lightning Lap, I don't see how a stock GT500 would be faster on the 'Ring. Plus, the way Randy Pobst talked about the brake fade in the GT500, I don't think it would do very well on a nearly 13 mile twisty road course. I'm thinking the car wasn't stock or there was a timing error.
20,600 m (67,600 ft)7:39Ferrari 430 ScuderiaHorst von SaurmaSport Auto (07/2008)[39]
20,600 m (67,600 ft)7:40Lamborghini Murcielago LP640Giorgio SannaLamborghini Autobild (01/2007)
20,600 m (67,600 ft)7:40Mercedes-Benz SLR McLarenKlaus LudwigAutoBild (07/2004)[citation needed]
20,600 m (67,600 ft)7:40Porsche 911 GT3 997MkIIHorst von SaurmaSport Auto (06/2009)[40]
20,600 m (67,600 ft)7:40Mercedes SLS AMGHorst von SaurmaSport Auto (2010)[41]
7:40.6Ford GTMarkus DraperOctane Magazine[citation needed]
20,832 m (68,346 ft)7:40.76Lamborghini Gallardo LP570-4 SuperleggeraSascha BertNovember 2010Auto Bild Sportscars (11/2010)
20,832 m (68,346 ft)7:41.23Porsche 911 Turbo SSascha BertNovember 2010Auto Bild Sportscars (11/2010)
20,600 m (67,600 ft)7:41.27Chevrolet Camaro ZL1 (2012)GM test driver Aaron LinkOctober 2011GM conducted test (10/2011)
20,832 m (68,346 ft)7:41.50Chevrolet Corvette ZR1Sascha BertAugust 2009Auto Bild Sportscars (08/2009)
7:42Porsche 911 GT3Walter RöhrlAutomobil (05/2006) Sport Auto (05/2006)
20,600 m (67,600 ft)7:42Lamborghini Murciélago LP670-4 SVHorst von SaurmaSport Auto (01/2010?) [42]
7:42.99Chevrolet Corvette C6 Z06Jan Magnussen2005General Motors,[43][44] Motor Trend confirmed, recorded from a standing start rather than the generally accepted rolling start technique now used [45]
20,832 m (68,346 ft)7:43.65Nissan GT-RSascha BertNovember 2010Auto Bild Sportscars (11/2010)
tiresome . . . Ya think?? ;)For Norm... ;)
![]()
![]()
![]()
Now here's the funny thing about that site, you can be perma-banned but then re-register under a new username with a different IP and, as long as you make posts that are in diametric opposition to what you posted previously and throwing in a few "why are here so many Mustang fanboys on a CAMARO site" for good measure, you get a 2cnd chance.
Here's where I'm going. Garagelogic was banned from C5 about the time that 2cnd Chance started posting. What if they are the same guy? I mean, how funny would it be if the same guy they kicked of the site years ago is the same person who is loved by all in the ' House?Welcome to the club! Funny thing is, I gave myself a 2cnd Chance to fit in over there and so far they've welcomed me as one of their own. Here's the key:
1) Call out all the folks who say anything positive about a competitor to the Camaro as fanbois
2) Praise and defend all things Camaro even if the information is known to be inaccurate or factually inconclusive
3) Keep the faith!
Besides, you're only suspended, not banned forever like some of us.