Sponsored

Thinking about going big turbo? Spool Data.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Tune+

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2015
Threads
25
Messages
1,639
Reaction score
842
Location
St. Paul, MN
Website
www.facebook.com
First Name
Adam
Vehicle(s)
2015 Ecoboost Mustang Automatic
I have been lucky enough to tune almost every turbo kit and turbo upgrade available for the Ecoboost Mustang. So, because of this I have been able to collect a ton of data on these different upgrades, but one question I get asked the most is "what does it spool like"? With the latest release of the Full-Race Twin Scroll turbo kit, and the Vargas Stage 2 stock frame upgrade the spool question is getting asked so much that I decided to just make a post and document everything.

How this is going to work, or how I envision this working is if you are in the market for a turbo kit and are interested in seeing a spool comparison between two turbo kits please request it below. I will quote you and post the comparison for you. I would love to have the spare time to just compare everything but it is not realistic with everything I have going on right now. I have dynographs and logs for the following turbo kits:

- Stock
- CP-E Twin Scroll 8374EFR Ball Bearing
- Full-Race Twin Scroll 7163EFR Ball Bearing
- FFTEC Open Scroll 7670EFR Ball Bearing (waiting for file)
- MAPerformance Open Scroll 5858 Journal Bearing
- MAPerformance Open Scroll 6466 Ball Bearing
- Vargas Turbo Technologies Stage 2 Stock Frame Journal Bearing

Here is all of them on one graph for now. :p

Sponsored

 

Juben

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 29, 2015
Threads
35
Messages
2,519
Reaction score
809
Location
Chattanooga, TN
First Name
Justin
Vehicle(s)
2015 EcoBoost Mustang (AT) w/PP
The torque curve is so flat on the 7163. It's hard for any turbo to match the EFR line-up.

Sent from my XT1095 using Tapatalk
 

dragonacc

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2013
Threads
13
Messages
1,667
Reaction score
411
Location
TN
Vehicle(s)
2015 Ecoboost PP
I'd like to see the CP-E 8374 vs the Full Race 7163 when you get the chance.

EDIT: I'll hopefully have my car on the dyno within the next month or two so if no one else has a chart for a single scroll 8374 I'll share mine.
 
OP
OP
Tune+

Tune+

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2015
Threads
25
Messages
1,639
Reaction score
842
Location
St. Paul, MN
Website
www.facebook.com
First Name
Adam
Vehicle(s)
2015 Ecoboost Mustang Automatic
The torque curve is so flat on the 7163. It's hard for any turbo to match the EFR line-up.

Sent from my XT1095 using Tapatalk
Well they all almost take a nosedive in torque at 5200rpms. This is because of the factory head and camshafts. With a good ported head and some camshafts this thing will make torque all the way to redline with almost ANY turbo upgrade.
 
OP
OP
Tune+

Tune+

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2015
Threads
25
Messages
1,639
Reaction score
842
Location
St. Paul, MN
Website
www.facebook.com
First Name
Adam
Vehicle(s)
2015 Ecoboost Mustang Automatic
I'd like to see the CP-E 8374 vs the Full Race 7163 when you get the chance.


The CP-E kit is on a built motor that we are looking to push into the 9's this season. This is NOT turned up, there is much more power left on the table but I figured this was in the 400-range and is a good comparison for most street customers.
 

Sponsored

Edkiefer

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2015
Threads
0
Messages
324
Reaction score
38
Location
NYC
Vehicle(s)
XR4ti
The Full-Race Twin Scroll 7163EFR seems impressive for its size, spools fast .
The Vargus 2 seems like something holding it back from fast spool, at least from a turbo size view, its one of smallest ?
It could also be not loading engine low enough on dyno to i guess .
 

stang77

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 31, 2015
Threads
30
Messages
1,029
Reaction score
150
Location
New Jersey
Vehicle(s)
2016 5.0
I have been lucky enough to tune almost every turbo kit and turbo upgrade available for the Ecoboost Mustang. So, because of this I have been able to collect a ton of data on these different upgrades, but one question I get asked the most is "what does it spool like"? With the latest release of the Full-Race Twin Scroll turbo kit, and the Vargas Stage 2 stock frame upgrade the spool question is getting asked so much that I decided to just make a post and document everything.

How this is going to work, or how I envision this working is if you are in the market for a turbo kit and are interested in seeing a spool comparison between two turbo kits please request it below. I will quote you and post the comparison for you. I would love to have the spare time to just compare everything but it is not realistic with everything I have going on right now. I have dynographs and logs for the following turbo kits:

- Stock
- CP-E Twin Scroll 8374EFR Ball Bearing
- Full-Race Twin Scroll 7163EFR Ball Bearing
- FFTEC Open Scroll 7670EFR Ball Bearing (waiting for file)
- MAPerformance Open Scroll 5858 Journal Bearing
- MAPerformance Open Scroll 6466 Ball Bearing
- Vargas Turbo Technologies Stage 2 Stock Frame Journal Bearing

Here is all of them on one graph for now. :p


I'm looking at kits now. Trying to decide if I want the MAP 5862 Ball Bearing or the Vargas Stage 2. Which would you recommend? How do they compare?
 

Joe_Stang

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 20, 2015
Threads
16
Messages
1,114
Reaction score
106
Location
Glen Burnie, Maryland
First Name
Joe
Vehicle(s)
2015 Mustang Ecoboost Premium
I'm looking at kits now. Trying to decide if I want the MAP 5862 Ball Bearing or the Vargas Stage 2. Which would you recommend? How do they compare?
The map turbo is making that power on race gas. I'm not that impressed with it.
 

mtpavelka

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 29, 2014
Threads
16
Messages
303
Reaction score
47
Location
Dallas, Tx
Vehicle(s)
2015 Ecoboost Mustang
Well they all almost take a nosedive in torque at 5200rpms. This is because of the factory head and camshafts. With a good ported head and some camshafts this thing will make torque all the way to redline with almost ANY turbo upgrade.
Not trying to derail the thread but a question about what you said there. What do you think a ported head, lets say MAP stage 5, with a stock turbo would look like?

Just thinking out loud from a foundation stand point. Build up from the ported head with a bigger turbo.
 
OP
OP
Tune+

Tune+

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2015
Threads
25
Messages
1,639
Reaction score
842
Location
St. Paul, MN
Website
www.facebook.com
First Name
Adam
Vehicle(s)
2015 Ecoboost Mustang Automatic
The Full-Race Twin Scroll 7163EFR seems impressive for its size, spools fast .
The Vargus 2 seems like something holding it back from fast spool, at least from a turbo size view, its one of smallest ?
It could also be not loading engine low enough on dyno to i guess .
The Vargas, even though it is in a stock frame configuration, it is a decently size turbo in there. The spool characteristics are based on the turbine housing design and the wheel sizes. The wheel sizes are great, however because you are working with the stock frame you are limited to what you can do. It is definitely not small in anyway.

I'm looking at kits now. Trying to decide if I want the MAP 5862 Ball Bearing or the Vargas Stage 2. Which would you recommend? How do they compare?
If you are going to go with a MAP kit you would want to go with a 5558 Ball Bearing to get decent spool. I am waiting for a customer to get on the dyno with his 5558BB setup so I can do the overlay comparisons. The 5558 spools about 500rpms faster than the 5858/5862.

The map turbo is making that power on race gas. I'm not that impressed with it.
Don't look at the power, this is only for spool comparison sake. I chose the graphs with the BEST spool for each turbo. I also tried to use graphs with 400-500whp for torque comparison. I made 500whp on the MAP 5862 about 5 dynopulls later on the same day as the graph above.

Not trying to derail the thread but a question about what you said there. What do you think a ported head, lets say MAP stage 5, with a stock turbo would look like?

Just thinking out loud from a foundation stand point. Build up from the ported head with a bigger turbo.

Like trash, the turbo can't keep up with the new high flowing head. You would want to do a turbo upgrade before doing any head work. I'm tuning a ported head/stock turbo car right now and it can barely hold 17psi at redline.
 

Sponsored

stang77

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 31, 2015
Threads
30
Messages
1,029
Reaction score
150
Location
New Jersey
Vehicle(s)
2016 5.0
The map turbo is making that power on race gas. I'm not that impressed with it.
According to MAP's website they provide a tune file that is good for 390whp. Any idea what tune file comes with the kit from Vargas? I'm leaning more towards Vargas because it's direct bolt on. Don't want to replace existing intake/downpipe.
 
OP
OP
Tune+

Tune+

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2015
Threads
25
Messages
1,639
Reaction score
842
Location
St. Paul, MN
Website
www.facebook.com
First Name
Adam
Vehicle(s)
2015 Ecoboost Mustang Automatic
According to MAP's website they provide a tune file that is good for 390whp. Any idea what tune file comes with the kit from Vargas? I'm leaning more towards Vargas because it's direct bolt on. Don't want to replace existing intake/downpipe.
You won't get a tune file with the MAP turbo kit. I used to supply it and when we separated I didn't leave any tune files for the turbo kit as each big turbo car should be individually tuned as there are too many variables that can't make every car perform exactly the same. Same thing goes for the Vargas Stage 2, there will be no tune file included as each car should be tuned for their modifications, location, and fuel.
 

stang77

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 31, 2015
Threads
30
Messages
1,029
Reaction score
150
Location
New Jersey
Vehicle(s)
2016 5.0
You won't get a tune file with the MAP turbo kit. I used to supply it and when we separated I didn't leave any tune files for the turbo kit as each big turbo car should be individually tuned as there are too many variables that can't make every car perform exactly the same. Same thing goes for the Vargas Stage 2, there will be no tune file included as each car should be tuned for their modifications, location, and fuel.
OK. That's understandable.
 

stang77

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 31, 2015
Threads
30
Messages
1,029
Reaction score
150
Location
New Jersey
Vehicle(s)
2016 5.0
You won't get a tune file with the MAP turbo kit. I used to supply it and when we separated I didn't leave any tune files for the turbo kit as each big turbo car should be individually tuned as there are too many variables that can't make every car perform exactly the same. Same thing goes for the Vargas Stage 2, there will be no tune file included as each car should be tuned for their modifications, location, and fuel.
So I assume that the customer would install the turbo and send you a log on whatever file he/she as last using?
 
OP
OP
Tune+

Tune+

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2015
Threads
25
Messages
1,639
Reaction score
842
Location
St. Paul, MN
Website
www.facebook.com
First Name
Adam
Vehicle(s)
2015 Ecoboost Mustang Automatic
So I assume that the customer would install the turbo and send you a log on whatever file he/she as last using?

They would need to purchase an E-tune from me in order to have a file created for the new turbo. You aren't going to be able to use this turbo on any off the shelf tune.
Sponsored

 
Status
Not open for further replies.
 








Top