Sponsored

GT350 Dyno Tune - JPC Racing/HP Tuners

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Jun 10, 2015
Threads
3
Messages
18
Reaction score
23
Location
Millersville, MD
Vehicle(s)
2015 Ecoboost
Just finished up doing a dyno tune on a customers car using HP Tuners today. Car came in making 498rwhp on our dyno and 408ftlbs of torque.

With our tune the car threw down 514rwhp and 425ftlbs of torque. Total gains of 16rwhp and 17ftlbs of torque. Most of the torque gains were found in the mid range.

Car was 100% stock other then the tune.

Red line is before, blue line is after.

Shelby GT350 HP Tuners JPC Racing.webp


While currently were not offering email tunes. We will be offering tuning in house.
Sponsored

 

Nataphen

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2014
Threads
4
Messages
1,063
Reaction score
302
Location
DFW
Vehicle(s)
2013 Mustang GT
Super happy dyno, but I like what they've done with it. They gave it a nice boost in the low end and smoothed out the torque bump very nicely. There's also a good increase in the top end where the stock tune starts to fall off.
 

C7 B8

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2015
Threads
13
Messages
429
Reaction score
108
Location
PDX
Vehicle(s)
'16 GT350R, '11 Mustang GT
Was rev limit extended?
 

Sponsored

Nataphen

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2014
Threads
4
Messages
1,063
Reaction score
302
Location
DFW
Vehicle(s)
2013 Mustang GT
There were alot of gains found in just the cam timing alone. Let me know if you guys have any questions

If you guys start remote tuning by the time I get mine, I'll have to get in touch. Is there a possibility of Flex Fuel tunes in the future with the HP Tuner software, or are you sticking to separate E85 and 93 octane tunes?
 

nastang87xx

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 5, 2015
Threads
94
Messages
6,550
Reaction score
4,170
Location
San Diego, CA
Vehicle(s)
2016 GT350 Track Pack
There were alot of gains found in just the cam timing alone. Let me know if you guys have any questions
Do you guys have any guesses as to why there is that plateau/dip starting at 2500 until the torque really kicks in around 35000? Emissions, maybe?
 

GT P-TREE

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2015
Threads
15
Messages
483
Reaction score
110
Location
Virginia Beach, VA
Vehicle(s)
2016 GT350 Track Pack
Do you guys have any guesses as to why there is that plateau/dip starting at 2500 until the torque really kicks in around 35000? Emissions, maybe?
Look up dynos for other FPC engines (F360, F430, 458, etc) and you'll notice a trend ;)

Nice work with the tuning.
 

65sohc

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2015
Threads
10
Messages
741
Reaction score
227
Location
Fresno, CA
Vehicle(s)
2016 GT350
If you guys start remote tuning by the time I get mine, I'll have to get in touch. Is there a possibility of Flex Fuel tunes in the future with the HP Tuner software, or are you sticking to separate E85 and 93 octane tunes?
Living in California with 91 octane I wouldn't consider anything but a Flex Fuel tune. I hope to start hearing some customer feedback on the forums since Lund announced their's more than a month ago.
 

nastang87xx

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 5, 2015
Threads
94
Messages
6,550
Reaction score
4,170
Location
San Diego, CA
Vehicle(s)
2016 GT350 Track Pack
Look up dynos for other FPC engines (F360, F430, 458, etc) and you'll notice a trend ;)
Very interesting. I never noticed that. Most of those dyno graphs look like mountain ranges. Is that because of tuning for the track or because of the characteristics of a FPC engine?
 

Sponsored

Nataphen

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2014
Threads
4
Messages
1,063
Reaction score
302
Location
DFW
Vehicle(s)
2013 Mustang GT
JPC tunes up the GT350

Look up dynos for other FPC engines (F360, F430, 458, etc) and you'll notice a trend ;)

Nice work with the tuning.


Very interesting. I never noticed that. Most of those dyno graphs look like mountain ranges. Is that because of tuning for the track or because of the characteristics of a FPC engine?

I said it once before on here somewhere, but Ford did a great job tuning this engine for a flat torque curve. If anyone feels that they didn't, just look at a Lamborghini Huracan dyno. The second picture is even after a tune!

ImageUploadedByTapatalk1453416835.969192.webp
ImageUploadedByTapatalk1453416851.900748.webp
 

asphal

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2014
Threads
7
Messages
123
Reaction score
41
Location
MI
Vehicle(s)
Mustangs
Do you guys have any guesses as to why there is that plateau/dip starting at 2500 until the torque really kicks in around 35000? Emissions, maybe?
[MENTION=16436]Aaron@Jpcracing[/MENTION] same question as above and I'm also thinking emissions compliance?

Wondering if this is anyone's gt350 on this site? The dyno definitely reads high and only the delta should matter but I'd be curious to see if it's also been tested elsewhere.
 

nastang87xx

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 5, 2015
Threads
94
Messages
6,550
Reaction score
4,170
Location
San Diego, CA
Vehicle(s)
2016 GT350 Track Pack
I said it once before on here somewhere, but Ford did a great job tuning this engine for a flat torque curve. If anyone feels that they didn't, just look at a Lamborghini Huracan dyno. The second picture is even after a tune!
Well I'm not saying they didn't but it's just a curiosity.
 

Nataphen

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2014
Threads
4
Messages
1,063
Reaction score
302
Location
DFW
Vehicle(s)
2013 Mustang GT
JPC tunes up the GT350

Well I'm not saying they didn't but it's just a curiosity.

I wasn't taking a dig at you. I just wanted to show how the FPC dynos typically look, and point out that Ford actually did a pretty good job on their OEM tuning. The Huracan is the most interesting to compare to me because it's also 5.2 displacement.
 

C7 B8

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2015
Threads
13
Messages
429
Reaction score
108
Location
PDX
Vehicle(s)
'16 GT350R, '11 Mustang GT
I wasn't taking a dig at you. I just wanted to show how the FPC dynos typically look, and point out that Ford actually did a pretty good job on their OEM tuning. The Huracan is the most interesting to compare to me because it's also 5.2 displacement.
Interesting. I'd further your compliments to Ford....The Huracan had less challenging constraints - packaging the motor (pure sports car vs every day car with trunks etc), budget, and mass production. :ford:

The huracan runs 12.7:1 CR. Maybe more to squeeze out on the GT350 there...maybe not. Im not an engineer.
Sponsored

 
Status
Not open for further replies.
 








Top