Oh nice! Can you let us know if you notice any performance difference with that velossatech? You have the exact same setup I’m thinking about running- Injen + velossatech. I suspect it’s a winning combo
I don’t know who tuned it but I would highly recommend lund. They seemed to have totally nailed the A10 calibration as compared to others based on what I’ve seen.
Those Injen and K&N units look real good. Debating on which one to try
On a side note- there’s no evidence that tune required intakes make more power than no tune required. In fact, I saw on an older mustang a shop tested an Airaid intake with and without the insert and the car made absolute...
Thank you for this! I have been looking at this intake forever so I appreciate this info. Can you elaborate on how it’s even better than stock IAT’s? And you actually felt it in the butt dyno? I’d be interested in what it does in the real dyno.
All in all it sounds like it could be worth it
Interesting thanks for the info, I would just think 22 whp would be immediately noticeable but I don’t know. You’re definitely flowing more air so that would hint at more power, right?
Also, how are IAT’s with this intake sitting at idle? That is my main concern
Thank you very very much, I appreciate this data. When you were stock, did u have the paper filter in or aftermarket drop-in?
Never considered this intake before but I’m intrigued, does it really feel like 20 whp faster? That seems like too much from just an intake