Search results

Sure would, only thing to keep in mind is that the 2015 intake ports are larger than the 12 (youd have more exposed cylinder head in the runner, not sure how much) and you'd also have to lock the cmcvs open

Also adding the above to the original post

Here Goes: [/URL][/IMG] The Red Circle is showing the Changes made to the hose that comes stock on the GT350 manifold, it has to be lengthened and I added a 90 to help it sit more square with the port on the CAI. The yellow circle is showing the new vacuum feed for the Brakes, instead of...

Sure thing once i get off work ill edit my underhood photo to highlight what changes were needed

Yes they were, the gains will remain consistent just the final numbers will be higher...pretty much just give a more accurate representation of the numbers produced

Also in tegards to power shifting at the elevated rev range, so far i have no issue, i do plan on upgrading to a dual disc setup before too long, and for those wondering about fitting x tb on x manifold the bolt spacing is entirely different, it was my hope as well....i am still working with a...

The low tq numbers are due to the dyno operator using 4th instead of 5th, hes has since offered a free redo to get the actual tq and hp of the car...sorry for the confusion

The part number on the box from ford for the tb is GR3Z-9E926-A

I sourced mine from ebay...theres 1 more listed from the same seller i bought from at 1075...then another seller has 2 listed at 1094 ea

Yeah the dyno operator drives a 93 lightning with a twin turbo coyote swap, and this manifold really peaked his interest Yes this was with the very subtle port mismatch (around 1mm all around), i do plan on removing it and doing some portmatching to the heads, which should help some, probably...

The coyote has shown better gains at an 11.8 -12.0 afr

LOL....he was referring to the cobrajet manifold, but awesome nonetheless

I only headed that off because it happens in every thread, somebody has a differing opinion, voices it and before you know it there's piss every where...goes from a thread to a rest stop bathroom real quick....lol

Before this turns into a pissing match....just keep in mind different strokes for different folks, some people prefer the visual pop of the cj, others like myself want things a little more low key....opinions are like....foreheads, yeah foreheads, everybody's got one...lets go ahead and not...

I think if i take the time with some aluminum bar stock i could make something that would fit the bill, ill try my hand at it and if successful, id have no problem making additional sets...ill get to work

Yeah boosted cars prefer high 10s to in some cases low 11s, but yes the 14 your referring to is the same thing i see at cruise and part throttle accel

Yeah most other n/a applications prefer around 12.5 - 12.8, which got some initial tuners in trouble when the coyote debuted

The coyote likes a rather rich afr at wot ideally .84 lamda (11.8xx)

Regarding the clutch, so far so good i just need to install a shift light because theres no layover to indicate that its time to shift, and im damn near out of usable tach Regarding the surge, after only 1 revision he has already almost eliminated it, it still there but really faint and for a...

The rpm difference is because i adjuted it with the handheld not through lunds initial tune inputs and he confirmed that it causes erratic and unpredictable results i.e. the lower than expected limiter, but the new 7800 limit is coded in by lund and it does in fact pull to 7800, regarding the...