Search results

Noone was saying it's easier to work in a smaller space. You seem to have reading comprehension issues. I could tutor you sometime. :p

The stang does have more engine bay space. But what he said is not wrong. I'd trust him when he says its faster to pull the motor. Not sure what's so hard to fathom.

Exactly. I be the hellcat spins its tires all the way through a 0-60 run.

0-60 is one of the most meaningless stats

I guess the more aggressive gearing could lead to lower mpgs and could subject it the GG.

I'm just messing around. Curious why bolt one and FI are important to you but going cam matters less to you when talking mod potential. Boltons and cam is a cheaper route than supercharger(at least in the cam in block engines) and will make some serious power. I know it's less cost effective in...

No, they're adding cam, singular lol

I'm sure it is. Todays V8s are getting more efficient. I just hope the treehugging commis don't kill the V8 like they have in Europe. It's got to take some serious restraint to get 25+. I don't have that kind of self control.

How long was the road trip if there are still 250 miles left in the tank? How does the computer calculate the average mpg? Is it per tank, is it reset at driver command? 28mpg could be possible on a road trip. I think my brother gets around 17mpg mixed.

I know, I was being sarcastic. I think the negativity over AFM is mostly unfounded. If you're building a strip car You might as well remove the AFM while your in there changing heads, cam etc.. If you're building a track car, you got the manual so you don't have AFM. And if you don't track the...

I wonder if it engages during spirited driving, or during a 1/4 pass? I bet it does. Why even call the car a v8? It should be called a v4. And I agree, I too have never driven a car with AFM but I can just tell its a nuisance. Go Mustang! suck it Camaro!

Arguing mod for mod is a stupid argument to have in opinion. The "discussion" should take place on the strip or the track. I do think the 5.0 will match the LT1 from the factory eventually. Regarding the AFM on the SS Auto, I think until there are significant, widespread problems with the...

If it's 2010 again, we'll betting power upgrades next MY.

I love that the one of the only times you take Chevy at their word on something is the 133lbs BIW weight loss and most everything else is a lie. It's so convenient because then you can use that 133lbs from "a long time ago" to discredit them today. Brilliant!

Not only do you loose, but you get bufu'd too.

It's easier than that to prove. Weigh ZaneWayne's car when it comes out. Meet up with him and make sure the tank is full. If it's heavy you win. If it's light you win.

You're car could weigh 3700lbs but it wouldn't matter because only an official document showing the breakdown of weight loss would suffice as proof. It's wonderful, everything GM publishes is a lie, but weighing your car isn't good enough. Only a GM document would really prove the weight. LOL.

I love it. ThePill can never lose. Even if he's wrong he's right.

Shift to od gear?

I think you know the base 1SS doesn't weigh 3780-3820, comparing results of different dynos by different techs in different years is pointless and lap times with different drivers and/or different days is also pointless. You're just messing around. Probably cracking up at the people getting...