Search results

Adagio for strings, Op. 11a by the London Philharmonic Orchestra

..

I'm wondering if maybe the one car is the GT350/GT350R and the other is perhaps a regular GT testing a new performance pack, possibly using GT350 parts?

^^^That's an ST test mule. We don't know if the RS will have a 3 door configuration also or just 5 doors. I personally never understood why the amount of doors immediately ruined a purchase for someone.

From my understanding, Ford uses the same projectors as the '13-'14 cars.

^^^91 octane at your altitude is equivalent to 93 octane at sea level. You'd have to add quite a bit more weight to affect the fuel mileage any. The key, as has been said, is to stay out of boost. The more you're in boost, the quicker the fuel mileage will suffer. The weight added by the...

You're right in that the EcoBoost family of 4 cylinders will never sound like an old Lima, but it's not because of the head. It's because of the crankshaft. The EcoBoost family uses 180* crankshaft like a flat plane crank V8. This design doesn't require a balance shaft and is responsible for the...

It would certainly be attainable with supporting mods and even pump gas. But as a tune only on a stock car, no it won't. The turbo would be out of it's efficiency range at that level. It's likely ramping the boost way up early in the rev range to achieve those numbers. I'm still curious as to...

That is certainly impressive!

Do we know that's still an issue?

The rods won't be the issues with this generation of Coyote and boost. It'll be the pistons as they are the only thing that isn't forged I do believe. That means with an excellent or safe tune, water/meth injection, and even E85, it's possible the motor could live fine at those levels.

^^No but it does account for the 1+ second scrubbed from the ET. Same reason AWD cars run quick ETs with relatively low trap speeds with having less power. Not knocking what Livernois is doing but the comparisons they are doing aren't really apples to apples either. They are changing variables...

If you guys are complaining about $100 then don't even consider these. Most retrofitters would charge you $100 or more just to open permaseal headlights, let alone change out the OEM LED boards with custom units and controllers.

My recommendations for LEDs would be as follows: Front side marker: http://www.diodedynamics.com/store/led-bulbs/listed-by-size/194/194-hp3-one Front turn signals/reverse light: http://www.vleds.com/v3-triton/bulb-system.html Interior...

4300K for the OEM xenons. I'm sure Ford is probably still using D3S for the capsules. Every Mustang that has been produced with xenons have been bixenon so definitely no surprise(and it's pretty obvious seeing as there is no separate high beam reflector in the headlamp assembly).

I'm going to throw a guess out there and say it will lay down 600whp at 7.5psi with the stock catback.

Turn signal: http://www.vleds.com/v3-triton/bulb-system/switchback.html Side marker/parking light: http://www.diodedynamics.com/store/led-bulbs/listed-by-size/194/194-hp3-one

Gearing also plays a huge factor in this. At 300 pounds lighter, the A3 has .3 of a second advantage from the start. Then the AWD plays into it as the Audi can launch and gain speed more quickly. If you rely solely on numbers to make decisions on a car then you're missing out on some great...

You're missing the whole point of an IRS unit though. It makes up gains EVERYWHERE. You can absolutely make a love axle handle great like an IRS car without hopping everywhere. But you do that at the expense of ride quality. Making the live axle handle better is just a compromise. The IRS will...

The EcoBoost will respond better to the mods you do vs. the naturally aspirated engine. Shifting can and has had a great affect on trap speed. If the powerband falls off abruptly at 5500RPMs, you're wasting time and speed by shifting at a 6500RPM redline. Ultimately, we won't know until some...