Search results

And you're making the right decision with Mustang for the track. I just don't get all the hate people have for a particular brand or car and most of it is unwarranted.

Will you ever get to your point? Any car can have issues. I have no idea what problems you have had with your Challenger. Again, my cousin's 07 Charger runs like a charm besides the rattle on the right side of dash. Sister in law's brother's 2012 Mustang rear end blew up with a few thousand...

I'm ruffling feathers? Sorry that my unbiased opinion bothers you.

I'm sure the 15 will be a great improvement for every day driving. I hated the rear end hop on the 2012 Mustang when driving over uneven surfaces. I also didn't like that I felt as I was sitting on top of the seat. Loved the seats in the GTO I owned and the way I fit in. My understanding is that...

It is not, but it's important. The SRT8 is a lot more comfortable than a Mustang than a Mustang is a better performer than the SRT8. Majority won't take these cars to the track.

Again, that is a problem to you. The extra weight sure makes it a great road trip car and highway cruiser. So comfortable.

You seem to fail to understand that 2011 and up had improvements and even my cousin's 2007 Charger has no issues. Just that rattle I guess. The quality is no worse than on a Mustang. My sister in law's brother's rear differential blew up on his 2012 Mustang while driving down the freeway. Stuff...

I "banged gears" on the street when I was 16-17.. When I was an idiot.

:crazy::confused: I think the Challenger would be braking, while the Ford would be breaking. On a serious note, I have no idea what you're trying to say. Turning at 100 mph on the highway? Alright then. Gotta love how people exaggerate the performance of certain cars... One way or...

I've driven the car.. There is nothing hard about driving the car. It's comfortable, pulls hard, and is fairly quiet. I've driven a 2007 Charger on multiple occasions with 60k miles and the only issue is a rattle in the far right side of the dash. Go tell that to all the people driving around...

The 392 Challenger is a quick and comfortable car.. It would make a great daily driver.

I agree with them not knowing the weight and they can't change anything now. However, they DID/DO know that the Camaro is overweight. I just can't see them not correcting this. ATS is at a solid weight and so is the CTS.

I'd definitely get the navigation. Phone is cool and I love Google, but an all in one system is pretty sweet.

Certain things on the Cadillac will not be as plush on the Camaro. You need to get in your head that the current Camaro 2SS is very well loaded. The wheels on the 2016 Camaro will probably be downsized to 19's for the "base" v8. Go to Chevrolet.com and Cadillac.com and start looking at weight...

I think you'll see similar real world numbers if you go to fuelly.com. 1LE may decrease the mileage. I believe it does have different gearing and definitely wider tires. Same goes for track pack Mustang for 2014 as far as what I have read. Gas mileage isn't as good as regular, but really there...

I'm not sure if you meant that the interiors of the Chevy's or Camaro models are not nice. Most new Chevy models have solid interiors. Camaro obviously needs an update. You don't see Chevy beating the efficiency numbers of the V8, 4, or 6 cylinder Mustang? The numbers on the V8 ones will...

2012 and up Camaro received a bit of an update to the interior and I'm sure the 2016 will be a decent leap. I don't see it gaining much weight in the interior department though. I believe it has 8 airbags already. 2016 will be lighter.

You have not explained what the 2SS doesn't have that the 2016 model will..

Care to explain what additional features will be added to the 2SS which weighs in at 3935 now that will make it a bigger porker? Automatic climate control perhaps?

You have no idea what you're talking about, Pill.. You do understand that the 15 is same as 14 right? Why would it weigh less? No point reading your predictions as they're filled with fanboyism.