EVL-S550
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2018
- Threads
- 5
- Messages
- 262
- Reaction score
- 147
- Location
- Northern VA
- Vehicle(s)
- 2018 Mustang GT
31 pages, lol. Just buy the damn thing!
Not until 100mphclub runs his EB car on DR31 pages, lol. Just buy the damn thing!
rhe original phase 1 on 15’s was 627hp before they bumped it up to 670hp with a free calibration. You can still find 15’s without the calibration.The Phase 2 on 15-17 was 727/610 vs 670/545 on the Phase 1.
They also have headers on the car in that video as well as a JLT cold air intake (doubt it does much).We know that the Roush design is prone to heat soak issues resulting in timing being pulled. However, I wonder if increasing the octane would make a significant difference.
In tis video, they ran a a Roush car on the VMP tune and then went back to the Roush tune. I do not know the DA but they made the point that it was toasty warm when they got to the track. They had boostane in the fuel and the VMP cal ran 12.30s and the Roush tune ran 11.1s.
I think it will be a 50-60hp increase for sure based upon waht they did last time. I actually drove a 15' Roush with the original 627hp calibration still on it. It needed the upgraded cal that's for sure. it was slow.If I can get a 50HP reliable warrantied increase with a tune; I’m in . How about Roush giving it for free to existing stage 1 customers! Class act company for sure!
I looked up the DA for that date and time, the DA was 1800 FT. I believe that 12.30 is a typo.We know that the Roush design is prone to heat soak issues resulting in timing being pulled. However, I wonder if increasing the octane would make a significant difference.
In this video, they ran a Roush car on the VMP tune and then went back to the Roush tune. I do not know the DA but they made the point that it was toasty warm when they got to the track. They had boostane in the fuel and the VMP cal ran 12.30s and the Roush tune ran 11.1s.
That was Roush tune which doe not increase timing for anything over 91, according to the Roush rep I talked to, versus VMP with a Boostane tune. They usually shoot for 98-100 octane which brings it up to about 680's rwhp.We know that the Roush design is prone to heat soak issues resulting in timing being pulled. However, I wonder if increasing the octane would make a significant difference.
In this video, they ran a Roush car on the VMP tune and then went back to the Roush tune. I do not know the DA but they made the point that it was toasty warm when they got to the track. They had boostane in the fuel and the VMP cal ran 12.30s and the Roush tune ran 11.1s.
Additional octane might not add timing but maybe it prevents so much timing from being pulled.That was Roush tune which doe not increase timing for anything over 91, according to the Roush rep I talked to, versus VMP with a Boostane tune. They usually shoot for 98-100 octane which brings it up to about 680's rwhp.
I ran boostane for about a month at 97 octane and all it did was make starting it after a short drive and stop difficult with the Roush cal. Along with the fact Roush tells you not to use it I don't think its worth the risk if warranty is important. If you're going to get a custom tune and not concerned with the warranty then it's great according to everything I've seen. Even better in Et's and Dyno's then 100 octane fuel.Additional octane might not add timing but maybe it prevents so much timing from being pulled.
Maybe it doesn’t add timing but I be it would help to pull timing if it was higher octane?That was Roush tune which doe not increase timing for anything over 91, according to the Roush rep I talked to, versus VMP with a Boostane tune. They usually shoot for 98-100 octane which brings it up to about 680's rwhp.
Have u ran your car?Boostane does add timing to my PBD tune.