Sponsored

Recommended catch cans & other questions

z6cyl

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 28, 2015
Threads
32
Messages
182
Reaction score
30
Location
Colorado
First Name
Zach
Vehicle(s)
2017 Mustang GT Base, MT-82, Ruby Red
Hi folks, I'm increasingly close to pulling the trigger on a 15 EcoBoost, but have a few other questions about modifications.

  • What's the recommended catch can manufacturer?
  • From extensively reading many threads in this forum it looks like the 2.3L I4 has a lot of potential with modifications related to performance. Do we know yet the limits of this engine with the stock block/internals how much PSI and HP are safe?
  • What are your guy's recommended first modifications?

Right now on my list is a catch can, manual transmission fluid swap and MGW's Race-spec shifter. I'll definitely be bringing this car to Stage 1 with a tune and full exhaust, but not sure about a new intercooler (wont ever see the track) or anything else yet. Thoughts?
Sponsored

 

AngelOreo

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 11, 2015
Threads
3
Messages
129
Reaction score
20
Location
Delaware
First Name
JimmyG
Vehicle(s)
2015 - Ecoboost Premium - 6mt - Deep Impact
In regards to safe numbers, there is no clearly defined line. That said, a couple of the repuatable Tuners here seem to be hitting 400/400 confortably. Keep in mind this is with quality and reputable tuner behind the Tuner Device.

Some feel more comfortable around 350, but that will be up to you, your Tuner of choice and the quality of fuel you choose to run.

An oil catch can is a great idea, but i think most here would recommend an upgraded FMIC(intercooler) if you plan to run your EB hard. That said, a Tune, Intercooler and a Cat h can would be a good top 3.

Hope this helps.

Jim
 
Last edited:

EcoSwag1990

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2014
Threads
60
Messages
3,278
Reaction score
910
Location
West Chester, PA
Vehicle(s)
2016 Triple Yellow GT
Why the immediate manual trans fluid swap??

Other than a catch can and tune which are some obvious good ones with this car. It all comes down to what you plan to do with the car and how you want it to sound. Intake will give you some cool sound and a few horses and same goes with exhaust. Exhaust will also drop some weight if you do full cat back or turbo back
 
OP
OP

z6cyl

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 28, 2015
Threads
32
Messages
182
Reaction score
30
Location
Colorado
First Name
Zach
Vehicle(s)
2017 Mustang GT Base, MT-82, Ruby Red
Why the immediate manual trans fluid swap??

Other than a catch can and tune which are some obvious good ones with this car. It all comes down to what you plan to do with the car and how you want it to sound. Intake will give you some cool sound and a few horses and same goes with exhaust. Exhaust will also drop some weight if you do full cat back or turbo back
I had a 14 with the manual and the stock fill vs Redline MTL was just night and day. Smoother gear changes and movement as well as better cold driving.
 

dragonacc

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2013
Threads
13
Messages
1,667
Reaction score
411
Location
TN
Vehicle(s)
2015 Ecoboost PP
You should read the thread on Mishimoto vs UPR catch can. It has everything you need to make your decision.
 

Sponsored

OP
OP

z6cyl

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 28, 2015
Threads
32
Messages
182
Reaction score
30
Location
Colorado
First Name
Zach
Vehicle(s)
2017 Mustang GT Base, MT-82, Ruby Red
You should read the thread on Mishimoto vs UPR catch can. It has everything you need to make your decision.
I read through that thread, I am slightly confused as I don't understand the pcv system on these cars (or any really).

It seems like the Mishimoto doesn't help from feeding the oily gases directly to the turbo where as the UPR does? What significance does this have?
 

AngelOreo

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 11, 2015
Threads
3
Messages
129
Reaction score
20
Location
Delaware
First Name
JimmyG
Vehicle(s)
2015 - Ecoboost Premium - 6mt - Deep Impact
It has to do with how it works under "boosted" driving. The second can helps when the car is under boost versus not.

I dont understand the how either to be honest, its just what read in the comparison thread.
 

dragonacc

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2013
Threads
13
Messages
1,667
Reaction score
411
Location
TN
Vehicle(s)
2015 Ecoboost PP
Check out this tech article on the Mazdaspeed 3's PCV system.

http://www.permtuning.com/index.php/pcv-plate-vented-occ-installation-notes

It's designed the same way ours is. You can stop reading once you get to the - the PERM approach to crank case venting. (Although if you want a serious overkill system you can buy that plate, it will fit our engines and copy his whole setup)

The dual valve can adds a second vacuum source so the PCV valve stays open all the time and air moves through the system (and through the catch can) just like it does under part throttle, idle etc. even if you are in boost or WOT.
 

dragonacc

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2013
Threads
13
Messages
1,667
Reaction score
411
Location
TN
Vehicle(s)
2015 Ecoboost PP
It seems like the Mishimoto doesn't help from feeding the oily gases directly to the turbo where as the UPR does? What significance does this have?
You are correct. The UPR can prevents the vapors from going into the turbo. Actually Mishimoto's testing didn't show any accumulation on their car from a can they hooked up to the turbo line, BUT, when you start running higher boost levels and add on more mods you are very likely to start getting oil going that direction on a single valve can.

It is potentially overkill for most people, but if the extra cost isn't a huge factor for you I would get the UPR can.
 
OP
OP

z6cyl

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 28, 2015
Threads
32
Messages
182
Reaction score
30
Location
Colorado
First Name
Zach
Vehicle(s)
2017 Mustang GT Base, MT-82, Ruby Red
You are correct. The UPR can prevents the vapors from going into the turbo. Actually Mishimoto's testing didn't show any accumulation on their car from a can they hooked up to the turbo line, BUT, when you start running higher boost levels and add on more mods you are very likely to start getting oil going that direction on a single valve can.

It is potentially overkill for most people, but if the extra cost isn't a huge factor for you I would get the UPR can.
What bad can happen from oil getting to the turbo? I realize it's bad when it gets into the intake/valves, but what about the turbo?
 

Sponsored

tsunami

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 18, 2014
Threads
138
Messages
1,543
Reaction score
214
Location
Minnesota
Vehicle(s)
2015 Premium EcoBoost Convertible
Oil vapors going into a hot turbo...My mechanic insisted that I use full synthetic oil.
Synthetic oil has a much higher temperature stability than regular or blend oil. It is almost impossible to get it to burn! I have wondered what the internal operating temperature of a boosted turbo is...and how much blade deposit would occur comparing regular/blend/full synthethic oil. Also, synthetic oil should have less carbon deposits on the valves, especially since there is no cleaning from the gasoline detergents.
 
OP
OP

z6cyl

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 28, 2015
Threads
32
Messages
182
Reaction score
30
Location
Colorado
First Name
Zach
Vehicle(s)
2017 Mustang GT Base, MT-82, Ruby Red
Oil vapors going into a hot turbo...My mechanic insisted that I use full synthetic oil.
Synthetic oil has a much higher temperature stability than regular or blend oil. It is almost impossible to get it to burn! I have wondered what the internal operating temperature of a boosted turbo is...and how much blade deposit would occur comparing regular/blend/full synthethic oil. Also, synthetic oil should have less carbon deposits on the valves, especially since there is no cleaning from the gasoline detergents.
Okay thats reasonable, it could make deposits onto the turbo blades.

Why even run a pcv tube to the turbo, why not just dump the crankcase vapor into the intake and call it good? Then we wouldn't need the dual catch can.
 

dragonacc

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2013
Threads
13
Messages
1,667
Reaction score
411
Location
TN
Vehicle(s)
2015 Ecoboost PP
Okay thats reasonable, it could make deposits onto the turbo blades.

Why even run a pcv tube to the turbo, why not just dump the crankcase vapor into the intake and call it good? Then we wouldn't need the dual catch can.
You still don't understand the PCV system.

The ideal operation of the PCV involves air being drawn through the engine not just letting the pressure out. In order for air to be drawn through it has to come from somewhere. Under normal operation the intake manifold has the highest vacuum so it will draw air through the engine FROM the line right before the turbo.

The only reason the air will go back the other way is when in boost and the PCV closes. The line has to be before the turbo because it must be a closed system in order to meet emissions requirements. That oily vapor is not just going into the turbo either, it will eventually coat the interior of the IC as well, decreasing it's efficiency.
 
OP
OP

z6cyl

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 28, 2015
Threads
32
Messages
182
Reaction score
30
Location
Colorado
First Name
Zach
Vehicle(s)
2017 Mustang GT Base, MT-82, Ruby Red
You still don't understand the PCV system.

The ideal operation of the PCV involves air being drawn through the engine not just letting the pressure out. In order for air to be drawn through it has to come from somewhere. Under normal operation the intake manifold has the highest vacuum so it will draw air through the engine FROM the line right before the turbo.

The only reason the air will go back the other way is when in boost and the PCV closes. The line has to be before the turbo because it must be a closed system in order to meet emissions requirements. That oily vapor is not just going into the turbo either, it will eventually coat the interior of the IC as well, decreasing it's efficiency.
You're right, I don't understand the PCV system at all. Even the reading you posted is a bit over my head. I couldn't point to a crank case on a motor so I don't quite understand this to an extreme degree. I would like to though, I'll do some more Googling.
 

Impulsed7

HPDE Champion
Joined
Jan 15, 2015
Threads
10
Messages
810
Reaction score
178
Location
Va Bch/Pittsburgh
First Name
Brad
Vehicle(s)
EB PP track rat...
old bmw idea, electric vacuum pump on the pcv? discuss... (not going to do it on my end)
Sponsored

 
 








Top