Free Agent
2015 GT Premium
Evidently they need some extra time to source the rear trunk reflector from Huffy Bicycle Corporation and JCWhitney for the cheesy rear spoiler.
Could not resist.
Could not resist.
Sponsored
It only took that tool eight hours to chime in over there, but he did not disappoint! Now the 2010 refresh of the Mustang was a direct response to the introduction to the Gen5 Camaro, not because the S197 body style was already five model years old when the 'Maro went on sale.:lol: In addition, he sprinkled in his normal amount of 4th grade-level commentary.That dude...OMG....I have never seen anyone like that in MY LIFE on a forum of any kind. I get a twitch when I read his stuff. I also lose IQ points.
Then buy $100k cars :cheers:I'd rather there were less of them on the road anyway, who cares about how many are sold...
13,144
UPDATED WITH CHARTS FROM ENATOR:
April 2015 Delivery (sales):
Mustang April 2015 Deliveries (actual sales):13,144 82% (Pr Ye)
Compared to Competition:
Camaro April 2015 Delivery (sales): 6,909 -24% (Pr Ye)
Challenger April 2015 Delivery (sales): 6,771 32% (Pr Ye)
![]()
![]()
![]()
The advantage of the Challenger though is a useable back seat for anyone over 12 yoa. I do not think GM will see nearly the sales increase that Ford is experiencing with the S550. The new Camaro just looks like a refresh, and I don't think there will be as much weight reduction as Chevy is claiming. I predict a slight increase with the next gen Camaro that tapers off while Mustang sales stays high.Challenger is expensive for what you get and way over weight not surprised there sales are the lowest. Will be interesting to see how the 2016 Camaro does not that it looks anywhere close to as good as the Mustang.
The advantage of the Challenger though is a useable back seat for anyone over 12 yoa. I do not think GM will see nearly the sales increase that Ford is experiencing with the S550. The new Camaro just looks like a refresh, and I don't think there will be as much weight reduction as Chevy is claiming. I predict a slight increase with the next gen Camaro that tapers off while Mustang sales stays high.
Financing should be the least of your worries... once you are sure you want a car, get pre-approved and walk in with a check that says "pay up to". Of course, then ford will beat that rate because they would rather you pay them.My main issue why I haven't bought a new mustang is financing. You can get a 2015 explorer for 0% to 60 months or 1.9% for 72 months! Why is the mustang a ridiculous 3.9% for 60 months and 5.9% for 72 months! I have perfect credit and I'm almost to 800. Is this seriously the best they can do? I'm thinking about looking into financing through my company's credit union or PenFed online. I hear they have great rates.
I own a 2014. I wanted the 15. Got pre approved Ford. Went 0.9 for 36 months. Credit in the 770's.Financing should be the least of your worries... once you are sure you want a car, get pre-approved and walk in with a check that says "pay up to". Of course, then ford will beat that rate because they would rather you pay them.
In 1964/65, the minimum wage was $1.25 ($2,600/year at about $6 in 96 $s)Well that's disappointing. The '65 sold 559,451; we're gonna be hard pressed to match that with anemic sales figures like this.