LSchicago
Well-Known Member
It's capable, but doesn't come flex fuel ready. No reason you shouldn't be able to use E85 right out of the showroom.Well, it is but it just takes an aftermarket tune to turn it on. Same exact logic.
Sponsored
It's capable, but doesn't come flex fuel ready. No reason you shouldn't be able to use E85 right out of the showroom.Well, it is but it just takes an aftermarket tune to turn it on. Same exact logic.
One reason……mileage.No reason you shouldn't be able to use E85 right out of the showroom.
F150 is rated on E10.One reason……mileage.
This right here. Many here are too young to remember or didn’t catch it. In 93 Ford re-rated the 5.0 to 205hp from 225hp (new rating system) and the the all new 94 comes out with 215hp, 10 more than the outgoing car for a HP increase for the new car.Yep. Same thing happened in 93-94
You obviously do not know your History - Contrary to your false assumption of "Not in the habit of giving customers something for nothing.....", the Coyote did Not start at 460 Hp, and went through numerous stages of development.https://fordauthority.com/2022/07/2024-ford-mustang-v8-to-approach-500-horsepower-exclusive/
First off, what is “approaches”? 480? 485? 490?
But more importantly, on which model? I seriously doubt they’re gonna bump up the base GT by 40 hp for free. Neither Ford nor any manufacturer is in the habit of giving customers something for nothing unless it is because sales needs a shot in the arm. They might bump up the base GT a tad to make up for the “lost” 10 hp, but I doubt that too since it would kill the sales of the ‘23s. They might as well just skip the already shortened ‘23 MY altogether.
So I’m guessing they’re gonna boost up the Mach 1 and jack up the price accordingly, in an effort to have that model slide into the empty slot left open by the demise of the GT350. They’re already headed in that direction anyway so it wouldn’t be much of a leap.
Speaking of the ‘23s, as I mentioned above I wouldn’t be shocked to see Ford call a last minute audible by extending ‘22 production, accelerating ‘24 rollout and cancelling ‘23 Mustang MY production altogether. It would almost make sense and stranger things have happened!
My understanding is that manufacturers are now required to submit engines to independent assessment - or observation that must meet strict empirical testing requirements - and Ford tend to underrate performance figures over the two decades.This right here. Many here are too young to remember or didn’t catch it. In 93 Ford re-rated the 5.0 to 205hp from 225hp (new rating system) and the the all new 94 comes out with 215hp, 10 more than the outgoing car for a HP increase for the new car.
Problem was the 93 car (with less hp mind you) blew the doors off of the new 94 car.
Wouldn’t surprise me if Ford is playing games with ratings just to make the new car look better without doing much of anything.
Remember you can down-rate as much as you want it’s overrating that gets you in trouble.
In the current market for Dodge:My understanding is that manufacturers are now required to submit engines to independent assessment - or observation that must meet strict empirical testing requirements - and Ford tend to underrate performance figures over the two decades.
Thanks for the history lesson; I had no idea! Geez, I always thought the Coyote had 460 from the git.You obviously do not know your History - Contrary to your false assumption of "Not in the habit of giving customers something for nothing.....", the Coyote did Not start at 460 Hp, and went through numerous stages of development.
A Company can Underrate (Conservative Claim) but not Overrate HP. Ford was seriously Fined for Falsely Advertising Claimed HP Figures (Misrepresenting Product Specifications) back in the 1970s, and has underrated them since.In the current market for Dodge:
2018 Demon- 808hp
2019-2022 Super Stock and Jailbreak- 807hp
2019-2022 Redeye- 797hp
They are ALL the same engine and produce 812hp per Chrysler in house dyno and EPA certification. Different advertised HP for different models.
Ever hear the term ”Advertised HP”? Thats just it advertised. As I stated you can go down, you can’t go up.
it's over 450, so who cares?but I’m only interested in knowing how much HP the S650 is going to have and how they are going to get it.
It's the same thing. MPGs/emissions are the opposite sides of the same coin.pretty sure the 2022 thing was for emissions not mpg.
That may not be hard to achieve with all the EV's coming out averaging 100+ MPGe ratings. Every EV makes a gas guzzler possible.It's the same thing. MPGs/emissions are the opposite sides of the same coin.
By 2026, light trucks and passenger vehicles/cars have to average 52MPGs.
By 2026.
We'll see.That may not be hard to achieve with all the EV's coming out averaging 100+ MPGe ratings. Every EV makes a gas guzzler possible.
ehh in my opinion emissions is what will really kill gas cars in the end. They will probably get to a point where a hybrid V8 mustang will get great MPG but you cannot get around emissions. This is the exact reason European cars now have OFP filters in the exhaust system, has nothing to do with MPG. In fact the European mustang GT has less power because of this.It's the same thing. MPGs/emissions are the opposite sides of the same coin.
By 2026, light trucks and passenger vehicles/cars have to average 52MPGs.
By 2026.