Science is now cancelled? [USERS NOW BANNED FOR POLITICS]

[sk47]

The amount of official information that has been released by the US government is already astounding. I think one of the stimulus bill laws is making them release this information. June 1st.


A former top national intelligence official hinted that an upcoming government report on UFOs will include information that cannot easily be explained.

"There are instances where we don’t have good explanations for some of the things that we’ve seen, and when that information becomes declassified, I’ll be able to talk a little bit more about that," former Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe told Fox New's Maria Bartiromo on Friday.
Ratfcliffe said some UFO sightings have been declassified in the past, but a report to be released by the Pentagon and other federal agencies will present more information to the American people.
"There have been sightings all over the world," Ratcliffe said. "And when we talk about sightings, the other thing I will tell you, it’s not just a pilot or just a satellite or some intelligence collection. Usually, we have multiple sensors that are picking up these things."
Ratcliffe said elements that are hard to explain in the unreleased sightings include movements that are hard to replicate or traveling at speeds that exceed the sound barrier without creating a sonic boom.
The report is expected to be released on June 1, Bartiromo said later in the program.


https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...ew-report-former-intel-chief-says/4802595001/

Hello; Well it is almost June 1. With all the galaxies out there it makes sense some places can have life. It would be odd that natural forces could only support life on one planet. That said tho it is not a sure thing until some direct evidence.
A craft with capacities of flight beyond what is possible for our human machines seems a strong case. The only way I can picture a human machine doing the moves is if it is a robot which can stand the high G forces.

Sponsored

 

[Chef jpd]

 

[K4fxd]

Looks like past warming periods have rose just as fast as today. Explain that

[/QUOTE]

 

[sk47]

Hello; Yes we had a short run. I find a few of things of interest. One is how the presence of the OP sends the thread from a discussion into a fuss fest. He seems more interested in conflict than making his stance understood. Even when we get some useful information out of him, he throws in some personal slurs which color the tone of things.

I began to think of why it has been so hard to find contrary information when I do a search. Then a post from a member telling how he had to use a round about method to find some old information because it was not coming up on google. He found the stuff. So the information was in effect "censored". I began to wonder if a lot of other stuff is censored in the same way. Maybe anything which goes against climate champions standards of evidence is flagged as 'misinformation" and restricted. After all we have plenty of examples of such in other areas. Perhaps the "gatekeeper" of the truth is using it's old tactics of before last November on climate change. Anyway it may be that when we are challenged to find "peer reviewed" information it is that that information is being restricted?

 

[K4fxd]

Looking at the chart I posted, taken from the OP, simple math shows over the last 500 million years the earth has been without ice caps longer than with.

Tells me without ice caps is more normal than with.

 

[sk47]

Looks like past warming periods have rose just as fast as today. Explain that

[/QUOTE]
Hello; Oo, Oo, Oo. It is well understood and known that CO2 level rise has preceded and lagged past warming events. (From the OP hisself) That ought to help make it clear. You may just be too logical to understand. ( trying to be funny, I am.)

 

[K4fxd]

I assume that chart will soon be censored.

 

[sk47]

Looking at the chart I posted, taken from the OP, simple math shows over the last 500 million years the earth has been without ice caps longer than with.

Tells me without ice caps is more normal than with.

Hello; one more thing must also follow. That being life survived. In fact life thrived in some of those ice cap free times. If I am thinking correctly the massive coal beds were laid down as dead plant matter. Maybe also the build up of organic sediments on ocean floors which eventually became the massive crude oil deposits.

 

[sk47]

I assume that chart will soon be censored.

Hello; Only if they realize it can be used against their favored way to view things?

 

[Burkey]

Looks like past warming periods have rose just as fast as today. Explain that

[/QUOTE]
Looks to me like you don’t know how to use a chart properly.
If you could explain how you could possibly get the kind of resolution required to properly make your point, from a graph where each mm represents 5 million years, you’re much better than the rest of us.
Alternatively, you could maybe listen to the people who produced the fucken graph in the first place, instead of pretending you have some magical insight that they somehow missed.

If you aren’t clever enough to work out that the chart lacks the required resolution, it’s unlikely that you’re bright enough to argue against the science behind it.

 

[K4fxd]

If you could explain how you could possibly get the kind of resolution required to properly make your point, from a graph where each mm represents 5 million years, you’re much better than the rest of us.

This is so simple that even a brainwashed climate zealot should be able to comprehend. All these warming chart lines go up at the same angle, or damn close to it.

How you can say this graph supports the myth that it is warming "faster" now than ever before is beyond comprehension.

 

[K4fxd]

In each instance something caused the earth to rapidly warm. Humans have only been around for the current one. And the jury is still out as to weather it will continue to warm or if it will start to cool again. Only time will tell.

 

[K4fxd]

If you carry it out to the other end, something caused the earth to rapidly cool.

Looks like NORMAL cycles to me.

 

[Burkey]

This is so simple that even a brainwashed climate zealot should be able to comprehend. All these warming chart lines go up at the same angle, or damn close to it.

How you can say this graph supports the myth that it is warming "faster" now than ever before is beyond comprehension.

Fuck me.
Even if the warming line went literally straight up for the past 1000 years, it would be utterly undetectable on the chart you posted.
Just stop and think about it for more than 3 seconds.

You can’t possibly be as dense as you‘re making yourself appear.

 

[Gregs24]

Looks like past warming periods have rose just as fast as today. Explain that

Have you looked at the scale on that graph. If you remember I posted that very same graph elsewhere and then also a more 'detailed' graph covering the last 800000 years. I also explained what had caused those warmings and that none of those factors was changing fast enough at present to make any difference. I'm not going to post it all again just because you can't be bothered to read or understand it from last time.

Sponsored