Levittown ford posted a part number for the splitter when I asked them. offered a promo discount code.
Not to mention the fact that other cars, like Posche, Ferrari, Corvette, or even GT350 manage to do it and look right. All those cars suck I guess.
More than likely, it'll understeer a bit more than in 100% OE configuration. That's not a bad thing for everybody, but please don't expect everybody to prefer it either.
I guess that's the difference between us . . . you're completely willing to sacrifice a little potential performance off the top for appearance reasons. I'm not, and will nearly always sacrifice conventional appearance preferences for potential performance instead. FWIW, I doubt I'd mount 325/30's on rims only 11" wide, either.
'Suck' is your word, not mine (why does it always have to come down to using extremes?).
Remember that I was only trying to give a plausible reason for why the OE wheel & tire setup looks the way it does. Nobody should have been looking for an agenda.
My car will probably see 3 track days a year honestly so I'm not really worried about maintaining max performance. I'm not experienced enough to drive the car at it's limits and beyond anyhow so having slightly diminished performance won't matter much. I'll likely get another set of wheels to run the SC2's at the track so my tires choices are strictly for street use. With that in mind I chose something with the looks I prefer and that help reduce the fender gap. 325/30's are within the recommended wheel size range but 11.5" is ideal. Even the factory 305/30's are on the minimum size wheel of 10.5" per Michelin's guidelines. After putting on the springs I have about 1.24" clearance on the front and about 1" on the rear with 4S tires. This will increase slightly when switching back to the SC2's due to the tire design so it should be fine. These Springs are also a bit stiffer than the PP2 factory setup. I want to say the PP2 is about the same as a standard GT350 and the FP springs are in between those and what the R comes with.
