ManBearPig
Well-Known Member
- Thread starter
- #1
I have read lots of threads here about tunes, and realize that almost everyone is happy with their chosen tuner when using one of the big names (Livernois, Lund, etc). I have no doubt that they are all "good", and most will claim that theirs is better than the other guy but have no real evidence to back that up. However I'm interested to see if anyone has actually ever had any personal experience with both of these big names? Yes, I know they're both great but I'd love to hear from someone who could provide some feedback on the differences between the two. For example tuner "A" pulls harder but tuner "B" has better drivability, etc. Objective stuff like that. I have a stock car, but will be adding LT headers soon. My plan is to buy the tune and the headers now, but will probably not install the headers until the winter. I have heard some folks say that you *do not* need a revision for headers. Does this apply to all tuners? That just seems strange to me. If the tune for headers vs factory manifolds is the same, why do you need a tune to run headers at all? Is it only to turn off the downstream o2 sensors? My main goal with the tune is to have smoother drivability and better throttle response (less lag) than the factory tune. Sometimes I can roll into the throttle hard and count to 3 before I feel the car give full power. This drives me nuts and I want to get rid of as much of that as possible. Yes, more power is great but I'm after smooth throttle response and good manners more than anything. I don't want to deal with any hesitations, funky idles, etc. I'm very picky about that sort of thing and am not willing to sacrifice any drivability for an extra few HP. I'd also like to get rid of the herky-jerky feeling the car has when it's cold but I don't know that any tune is going to accomplish that. Input and opinions welcome.
Thanks
Thanks
Sponsored