Roh92cp
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 27, 2015
- Threads
- 79
- Messages
- 2,896
- Reaction score
- 1,174
- Location
- Fort Kent Maine
- First Name
- Shawn
- Vehicle(s)
- OW GTPP Whipple
- Thread starter
- #1
Thinking more about this since my new engine install I took the liberty of installing a dedicated oil temp gauge this time and T off from the oil pressure sender bung. I've noticed now that since I can watch actual oil temps that the factory gauge is way off and behind actual temps reported by the gauge. I believe the factory center gauge display is theoretical not from an actual temp sensor, likely it's extrapolated from the engine coolant temp. My stock gauge gets into normal range pretty quick and the oil temp sensor I installed has still not moved off 120 degrees. In fact even when the factory gauge gets near halfway in the green zone the other gauge is just starting to move off 120 the lowest point. It takes driving for some time for the gauge I stalled to get to 180 where I would feel safe to hammer on the engine. Point is the stock gauge seems to be showing normal when oil may not be hot enough to sustain hard loads and full throttle under boost. Also if one was to use a higher weight oil is could exacerbate the issue causing premature bearing wear or possible stock OPG failure. I know when I lost my stock OPG the stock gauge was showing normal, but now with my new oil temp gauge I know the distance I drove was not sufficient to get oil up to temps to hammer on it like I did. Just an observation and would encourage anyone with actual data or knowledge to chime in. I installed a Prosport Halo oil temp gauge. I was really impressed with the accuracy of the Prosport halo boost gauge witch I've tested against another mechanical gauge and the Zietronix (very accurate) boost gauge I have running through my NGauge as well. So I figure the temp gauge would be accurate as well.
Sponsored
Last edited: