Sponsored

PMAS Intake Systems from UPR Products. TUNE AND NO TUNE INTAKES

longbowsvt

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 19, 2015
Threads
14
Messages
186
Reaction score
20
Location
Fort Riley, Kansas
Vehicle(s)
2015 GT PP magnetic metallic
I would like to see the results of a dyno comparison. My decision to lose the pmas intake was from a drivability stand point.
Sponsored

 

Kuba

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2016
Threads
9
Messages
262
Reaction score
96
Location
Streamwood IL
First Name
Jacob
Vehicle(s)
Ram 2500
I would like to see the results of a dyno comparison. My decision to lose the pmas intake was from a drivability stand point.
Would you elaborate a bit more about how PMAS affected driveability. I haven't installed my PMAS intake yet as I'm waiting for my base dyno day next month. I understand that there was something that bothered you since it made you get rid of it and I'm curious to know what was that. I'd appreciate if you'd share your experience running PMAS Intake as I'm sure other members would like to hear from you. Thx in advance :thumbsup:
 

4V Mayhem

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 20, 2016
Threads
9
Messages
1,368
Reaction score
529
Location
US
Vehicle(s)
2015 Mustang GT Premium M6
I think this sounds like a great idea personally.
Thanks man! Anyone who knows anything about marketing, advertising, and social media would jump on this. I think live streaming could possibly be the new trend especially for small shops. I think if they did this and announced a date and time beforehand, they'd get a swarm of viewers. Look at the interest and attention this thread itself now has. Even if the CAI has no or little gains they'll still get new customers. And it is no sweat off the shop's back. But perhaps there are licensing things that go along with it. Like if a company does this and uses a specific product, there would probably be some legal things on what they can say, do, or how they represent the product.
 

longbowsvt

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 19, 2015
Threads
14
Messages
186
Reaction score
20
Location
Fort Riley, Kansas
Vehicle(s)
2015 GT PP magnetic metallic
For anyone wanting the pmas intake I would recommend the tune required one that uses your OEM maf. That's where I messed up, I had the no tune required which uses an aftermarket card style maf and a transfer box to convert the maf signal in a usable signal for the PCM. Initially when I received my pmas I have the V1 transfer box which stopped working almost immediately. So back to the stock intake I went. Called pmas and promptly received the v2 transfer box with an assurance that this one was revised and would not fail. About a month after installing the v2 box in went out to start my car one morning and yet again the box had failed making my car undriveable. So back to the stock intake I went. At that point I was done with the pmas intake so I bought a roush and no more issues. Not only was the pmas unreliable the drivability was not good. The car surged badly at lows speeds, the car had to be up to temp before I could drive it. WOT shifts were very harsh, the car would jerk horibly when I released the clutch after changing gears. I thought that my tune and the intake were clashing and causing the issues so I returned my car to stock and still had the same issues. I have had none of those issues with the stock intake or the roush I have now.
 

Jayme

DoggystyleRacing®
Joined
May 24, 2015
Threads
27
Messages
447
Reaction score
80
Location
Baytown, TX
Website
www.aedhp.com
First Name
Jayme
Vehicle(s)
2015 Mustang GT
For anyone wanting the pmas intake I would recommend the tune required one that uses your OEM maf. That's where I messed up, I had the no tune required which uses an aftermarket card style maf and a transfer box to convert the maf signal in a usable signal for the PCM. Initially when I received my pmas I have the V1 transfer box which stopped working almost immediately. So back to the stock intake I went. Called pmas and promptly received the v2 transfer box with an assurance that this one was revised and would not fail. About a month after installing the v2 box in went out to start my car one morning and yet again the box had failed making my car undriveable. So back to the stock intake I went. At that point I was done with the pmas intake so I bought a roush and no more issues. Not only was the pmas unreliable the drivability was not good. The car surged badly at lows speeds, the car had to be up to temp before I could drive it. WOT shifts were very harsh, the car would jerk horibly when I released the clutch after changing gears. I thought that my tune and the intake were clashing and causing the issues so I returned my car to stock and still had the same issues. I have had none of those issues with the stock intake or the roush I have now.
I had the same issues with the first version kit and the newest design is different, using your OEM maf for tune only kits. I have no driveability issues with the newest version that is now being sold.
 
Last edited:

Sponsored

DarkHorse850

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2014
Threads
10
Messages
336
Reaction score
19
Location
Milton, FL
Vehicle(s)
2015 Mustang GT PP 6-spd DIB
It would have been awesome to get some step by step instructions with this thing...
 

longbowsvt

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 19, 2015
Threads
14
Messages
186
Reaction score
20
Location
Fort Riley, Kansas
Vehicle(s)
2015 GT PP magnetic metallic
Yeah I second that! I feel like pmas knew this initial version had issues and still released it. 400 bucks for a substandard product is not how I want to spend my money.
 

Optimum Performance

Well-Known Member
Gold Sponsor
Joined
Mar 13, 2016
Threads
62
Messages
1,842
Reaction score
1,404
Location
Titusville, Florida
Website
www.facebook.com
First Name
Tommy
Vehicle(s)
'15 GT PP
For anyone wanting the pmas intake I would recommend the tune required one that uses your OEM maf. That's where I messed up, I had the no tune required which uses an aftermarket card style maf and a transfer box to convert the maf signal in a usable signal for the PCM. Initially when I received my pmas I have the V1 transfer box which stopped working almost immediately. So back to the stock intake I went. Called pmas and promptly received the v2 transfer box with an assurance that this one was revised and would not fail. About a month after installing the v2 box in went out to start my car one morning and yet again the box had failed making my car undriveable. So back to the stock intake I went. At that point I was done with the pmas intake so I bought a roush and no more issues. Not only was the pmas unreliable the drivability was not good. The car surged badly at lows speeds, the car had to be up to temp before I could drive it. WOT shifts were very harsh, the car would jerk horibly when I released the clutch after changing gears. I thought that my tune and the intake were clashing and causing the issues so I returned my car to stock and still had the same issues. I have had none of those issues with the stock intake or the roush I have now.
I had the same issues with the v1 kit and the v2 design is different. I have no driveability issues with the v2 kit that is now being sold.
V1 and V2 used the box and their MAF sensor, V2 added a separate IAT sensor placed right above the radiator :headbonk: so it gave very inaccurate intake temps. V3 is a tube with a factory MAF (calibrated or uncalibrated) and a redesigned elbow. V3 is the current one now being sold.
 

Coaster

RallyNorthAmerica.com
Joined
Jan 9, 2015
Threads
11
Messages
937
Reaction score
455
Location
Central Ohio
Website
www.imprtcl.com
First Name
Brian
Vehicle(s)
'15 Fastback GT Guard
V1 and V2 used the box and their MAF sensor, V2 added a separate IAT sensor placed right above the radiator :headbonk: so it gave very inaccurate intake temps. V3 is a tube with a factory MAF (calibrated or uncalibrated) and a redesigned elbow. V3 is the current one now being sold.
My V1 kit was ok other than the stepping in the IATs.

The V2 kit, even though the electronics package was very nicely built, was rough. Out of the box the temp sensor didn't work because the converter box was bad. Got the converter replaced and it was ok for a long time, until it wasn't.

The source of all the issues with the V1 and V2 kits was really the converter box, which is gone in V3. I had hoped to play with the V3 kit before I went on vacation but it never showed up. [MENTION=15451]PMAS[/MENTION] has probably been busy getting the shipping issues sorted out to paying customers, I'm in no rush.

Hopefully there will be some nice dynos by the time I'm back.
 

Sponsored

Kuba

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2016
Threads
9
Messages
262
Reaction score
96
Location
Streamwood IL
First Name
Jacob
Vehicle(s)
Ram 2500
[MENTION=15243]longbowsvt[/MENTION],
Thanks a lot for your input, This will prompt me to install mine asap to see what's up with this kit.
 

dev1360

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 8, 2015
Threads
12
Messages
672
Reaction score
317
Location
STL
Vehicle(s)
DIB 2016 S550
[MENTION=15243]longbowsvt[/MENTION],
Thanks a lot for your input, This will prompt me to install mine asap to see what's up with this kit.
His issues are moot because the intake being sold now is different.

"No tune" is sent with their MAF already calibrated for the intake. "Tune required" reuses your stock MAF. In both cases, it is a factory card style MAF.

I have had no issues with drivability.
 

15dib

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2016
Threads
9
Messages
401
Reaction score
26
Location
texas
Vehicle(s)
2015 Mustang
I have the latest version of it. I've driven it about six times in a 9 hour trip and have had no issues at all. I'm guessing it was the way the maf was on the older versions that caused the issues.
 

Kuba

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2016
Threads
9
Messages
262
Reaction score
96
Location
Streamwood IL
First Name
Jacob
Vehicle(s)
Ram 2500
[MENTION=19646]dev1360[/MENTION],
Ohh... Got ya, after reading all the comments now I'm able to put the puzzles together :headbonk: and put the situation at ease :cheers:
For others I'd recommend a :chill: pill
 
 








Top