benanderson89
Hooneriffic
I just noticed another thing on my finance form. The car is listed as having 421PS, not 412. How strange...
I only do about 9k per year but £336@15k miles is still less than what I'm paying for the Kia (£358.54).
Quick Aside: Its why I'm glad the government is scrapping the old VED scheme based on CO2 emissions. Maybe then manufacturers will start reintroducing larger 4-cylinder NA engines (2.4L+ etc.) or even V6s. Turbo-chargers are great and all, but as the American EPA tests have shown, they don't exactly equal better fuel economy. Once the new NEDC tests come into play with far more realistic fuel economy ratings, maybe people will stop open mouth kissing diesel engines, too. Its like, great - you hover around 50mpg in your 130hp Diesel on the motorway, and so does a 1.6L NA 130HP Kia Cee'd with a Petrol engine. The only time I've genuinely seen a Diesel thrash a petrol in terms of fuel economy is when the power is down and the owner walks on broken glass.
15,000What mileage did you put on it to get a GFV of £14.5k? That seems to have dropped since I was last looking at them if you left it on standard 12k per annum.
I only do about 9k per year but £336@15k miles is still less than what I'm paying for the Kia (£358.54).
It'll be interesting to see a comparison between your car and mine, since both of us have to deal with A19 North Bound traffic every morning.You're not wrong there, if I sit off turbo the car just asks for a sip of fuel every now and then, on turbo and it drinks like a student in freshers week.
Last tank returned 26mpg and that's 100% town, home to graft and back crawling through the western bypass morning car park ( along with a couple of wot runs)
Quick Aside: Its why I'm glad the government is scrapping the old VED scheme based on CO2 emissions. Maybe then manufacturers will start reintroducing larger 4-cylinder NA engines (2.4L+ etc.) or even V6s. Turbo-chargers are great and all, but as the American EPA tests have shown, they don't exactly equal better fuel economy. Once the new NEDC tests come into play with far more realistic fuel economy ratings, maybe people will stop open mouth kissing diesel engines, too. Its like, great - you hover around 50mpg in your 130hp Diesel on the motorway, and so does a 1.6L NA 130HP Kia Cee'd with a Petrol engine. The only time I've genuinely seen a Diesel thrash a petrol in terms of fuel economy is when the power is down and the owner walks on broken glass.
Sponsored
