Sponsored

15 GT PP Volk TE37 SL

Bbarfoot14

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 19, 2016
Threads
79
Messages
519
Reaction score
135
Location
RI
Vehicle(s)
2015 Mustang GT PP
Vehicle Showcase
1
Hey guys I need some help figuring out my setup. I am lowered on eibach sportline springs currently with my 2015 mustang gt PP with the brembos. I can not figure out what sizes to run and I am ready to pull the trigger on these bad boys. I want to run an aggressive setup but not jeopardize the functionality of the car as volks are obviously extremely light weight performance wheels. any advice would help.
I think the fronts my options are only the 19x9.5 +22 and the fitment should work well (says the guy at the website I went to).
And my back options are:
1.19x10.5 +22 (which I don't believe will fit)
2. 19x 10.5 + 12
3. 19x 11 +23
Sponsored

 

Need4SpeedMotors

Well-Known Member
Diamond Sponsor
Joined
Nov 17, 2014
Threads
194
Messages
21,557
Reaction score
5,143
Location
Los Angeles, CA
Website
www.n4sm.com
First Name
N4SM Team
Vehicle(s)
S550 Mustang & Shelby GT350 platform
[MENTION=21069]Bbarfoot14[/MENTION] Id be happy to help out brotha.

the offsets I see are aggressive the 9.5 ET 22 will work itll poke a tad but work the 11 is too aggressive the 10.5 ET 12 is too aggressive and the 10.5 ET 22 is too aggressive as well.

Any other options, im down to help you just find the proper application.
 
OP
OP
Bbarfoot14

Bbarfoot14

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 19, 2016
Threads
79
Messages
519
Reaction score
135
Location
RI
Vehicle(s)
2015 Mustang GT PP
Vehicle Showcase
1
Unfortunately they do not offer any other sizes, I cant consider a 9.5 + spacer in back as it wouldnt give me the concavity you get from that 10.5/11 volk.
 

Need4SpeedMotors

Well-Known Member
Diamond Sponsor
Joined
Nov 17, 2014
Threads
194
Messages
21,557
Reaction score
5,143
Location
Los Angeles, CA
Website
www.n4sm.com
First Name
N4SM Team
Vehicle(s)
S550 Mustang & Shelby GT350 platform
Unfortunately they do not offer any other sizes, I cant consider a 9.5 + spacer in back as it wouldnt give me the concavity you get from that 10.5/11 volk.
You dont want to use a spacer brotha, that would make the offset lower which makes it not fit.

Always remember using a spacer take the offset and subtract the size of the spacer and thats the new" offset"
 

Vanquisher

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 16, 2016
Threads
7
Messages
182
Reaction score
30
Location
US
Vehicle(s)
15 Mustang GT
Look at TE37 Ultras. Face3 gives you some concavity and you can get them 20x10 +30 for the front and 20x11 +40 in the rear. I'm planning on running a similar wheel setup. 9.5 +28 in the front and 20x11 +39 rear.

You can also use the below, pretty useful to give you an idea of how what your looking at compares against stock.

https://www.1010tires.com/Tools/Wheel-Offset-Calculator#
 
Last edited:

Sponsored

Need4SpeedMotors

Well-Known Member
Diamond Sponsor
Joined
Nov 17, 2014
Threads
194
Messages
21,557
Reaction score
5,143
Location
Los Angeles, CA
Website
www.n4sm.com
First Name
N4SM Team
Vehicle(s)
S550 Mustang & Shelby GT350 platform
True but then you need to also put into consideration x favtor phase 3 is a deeper concave it could not fit due to caliper clearance.
 

Vanquisher

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 16, 2016
Threads
7
Messages
182
Reaction score
30
Location
US
Vehicle(s)
15 Mustang GT
True but then you need to also put into consideration x favtor phase 3 is a deeper concave it could not fit due to caliper clearance.
True but I'd say the way the spoke concaves give more clearance for BBK. I'd only be concerned ever so slightly with face4. 3 is mild.
 

Need4SpeedMotors

Well-Known Member
Diamond Sponsor
Joined
Nov 17, 2014
Threads
194
Messages
21,557
Reaction score
5,143
Location
Los Angeles, CA
Website
www.n4sm.com
First Name
N4SM Team
Vehicle(s)
S550 Mustang & Shelby GT350 platform
True but I'd say the way the spoke concaves give more clearance for BBK. I'd only be concerned ever so slightly with face4. 3 is mild.
Phase 4 is def a no go, the offsets are wrong also

Phase 3 ya I mean best way is I speak to the engineers there make sure its good for fitment.

BBK setups utilize a different caliper geometry, even though the rotor is larger that doesnt matter as much as the caliper sizing, if its round or skinny, tall or fat those are more of a concern.
 

Vanquisher

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 16, 2016
Threads
7
Messages
182
Reaction score
30
Location
US
Vehicle(s)
15 Mustang GT
Phase 4 is def a no go, the offsets are wrong also

Phase 3 ya I mean best way is I speak to the engineers there make sure its good for fitment.

BBK setups utilize a different caliper geometry, even though the rotor is larger that doesnt matter as much as the caliper sizing, if its round or skinny, tall or fat those are more of a concern.
Agreed no face4 would work on the 5.0 from what I'm seeing. I think its gonna be tough getting a hold of them lol. Maybe you'd have luck with Mackin.

I'm only saying since I actually had TEs for my RS5 which IMO the stock BBK is just massive. Like you said fatter than say the 6 piston brembo kit. The concave when I test fit them I felt gave me more clearance around the caliper than say my DPE CS16s.

No to thread jack but what is your inital thought on 20x9.5 +28 and 20x11 +39 for fitment on the mustang.

20x9.5 +28 puts me 11mm more inner clearance and only 23mm more extended. 20x11 +39 puts me 6mm less inner and 32mm extended vs stock. I think it'll clear the rear with some camber.
 

Need4SpeedMotors

Well-Known Member
Diamond Sponsor
Joined
Nov 17, 2014
Threads
194
Messages
21,557
Reaction score
5,143
Location
Los Angeles, CA
Website
www.n4sm.com
First Name
N4SM Team
Vehicle(s)
S550 Mustang & Shelby GT350 platform
Agreed no face4 would work on the 5.0 from what I'm seeing. I think its gonna be tough getting a hold of them lol. Maybe you'd have luck with Mackin.

I'm only saying since I actually had TEs for my RS5 which IMO the stock BBK is just massive. Like you said fatter than say the 6 piston brembo kit. The concave when I test fit them I felt gave me more clearance around the caliper than say my DPE CS16s.

No to thread jack but what is your inital thought on 20x9.5 +28 and 20x11 +39 for fitment on the mustang.

20x9.5 +28 puts me 11mm more inner clearance and only 23mm more extended. 20x11 +39 puts me 6mm less inner and 32mm extended vs stock. I think it'll clear the rear with some camber.


Nice were you a member on Audizine as well? I started out vendor setup on the forum. Super familiar with the rs5 platform as well.

The front your perfect the rear its aggressive normally on a 11 i like staying with a et 48 at the lowest.

The car is a low offset front high offset rear, I also prefer pure functional setups to a limit.

There is a member running 20x10 et 30 and 20x11 et 40 with invo tires has alignment and camber adjustments so its doable but the rear is a bit aggressive. Aslong as you adjust your camber specs you can make it work
 

Sponsored

Vanquisher

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 16, 2016
Threads
7
Messages
182
Reaction score
30
Location
US
Vehicle(s)
15 Mustang GT
Nice were you a member on Audizine as well? I started out vendor setup on the forum. Super familiar with the rs5 platform as well.

The front your perfect the rear its aggressive normally on a 11 i like staying with a et 48 at the lowest.

The car is a low offset front high offset rear, I also prefer pure functional setups to a limit.

There is a member running 20x10 et 30 and 20x11 et 40 with invo tires has alignment and camber adjustments so its doable but the rear is a bit aggressive. Aslong as you adjust your camber specs you can make it work
Yessir on Audizine and still hang out there since I have my A3 TDI daily. Makes sense on the offsets but I've seen +40 doable on a few here so figured lowest i'd want to be is 39/40 in the rear. On that +40 rear hows clearance to the caliper? I know its a small caliper so not worried.

On that setup what is he running out back 295 on the 20x11 +40? Adjusted with stock hardware on the alignment or do you really need adjustable hardware out back to get the camber adjustments.:cheers:
 

Need4SpeedMotors

Well-Known Member
Diamond Sponsor
Joined
Nov 17, 2014
Threads
194
Messages
21,557
Reaction score
5,143
Location
Los Angeles, CA
Website
www.n4sm.com
First Name
N4SM Team
Vehicle(s)
S550 Mustang & Shelby GT350 platform
Yessir on Audizine and still hang out there since I have my A3 TDI daily. Makes sense on the offsets but I've seen +40 doable on a few here so figured lowest i'd want to be is 39/40 in the rear. On that +40 rear hows clearance to the caliper? I know its a small caliper so not worried.

On that setup what is he running out back 295 on the 20x11 +40? Adjusted with stock hardware on the alignment or do you really need adjustable hardware out back to get the camber adjustments.:cheers:

Nice ya we have a shop r8 and a3 , we post on there alot actually.

Hes running a 315 35 20 on the resr with camber. If you lower it just to the proper hight and camber youll be fine, clearance is fine on the rear its more of a matter upfront.
 

Vanquisher

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 16, 2016
Threads
7
Messages
182
Reaction score
30
Location
US
Vehicle(s)
15 Mustang GT
Nice ya we have a shop r8 and a3 , we post on there alot actually.

Hes running a 315 35 20 on the resr with camber. If you lower it just to the proper hight and camber youll be fine, clearance is fine on the rear its more of a matter upfront.
Right. Planning on lowering on coils to dial-in. 275 up front and a 305 rear on the specs I said.

Appreciate the insight/advice :first::cheers:
 

Need4SpeedMotors

Well-Known Member
Diamond Sponsor
Joined
Nov 17, 2014
Threads
194
Messages
21,557
Reaction score
5,143
Location
Los Angeles, CA
Website
www.n4sm.com
First Name
N4SM Team
Vehicle(s)
S550 Mustang & Shelby GT350 platform
Right. Planning on lowering on coils to dial-in. 275 up front and a 305 rear on the specs I said.

Appreciate the insight/advice :first::cheers:
No worries , ya a 275 305 youll be good.

Let me know a if I can help any other way.
Sponsored

 
 








Top