jb86
Member
If not I will buy two! Was this an online price or local?Can the Michelin Pilot Sports 305s fit on the R rear wheels? I was able to buy 6 of them for $561 total, the 325s weren't available.
Sponsored
If not I will buy two! Was this an online price or local?Can the Michelin Pilot Sports 305s fit on the R rear wheels? I was able to buy 6 of them for $561 total, the 325s weren't available.
None, I have a friend that works at Michelin.If not I will buy two! Was this an online price or local?
For sure, and I agree with that no doubt. My comments were primarily aimed at what can actually fit as opposed to what is best for steering feel. I just got my 325's mounted two days ago, and could immediately tell a huge difference between the super sports and the cup 2's.This article explains the effects of a wide tire on narrow wheel and vice versa. Makes sense why Ford sized the wheels and bespoke PSS & PSC2 the way they did, to maximize the response, feeling, and performance of the tire:
http://www.motoiq.com/MagazineArtic...LY-select-and-size-TIRES-for-PERFORMANCE.aspx
When I go to get another set, no way will I run 295/30 series tires up front... don't need the car any lower up there than it is already! Will run a 305 up front primarily to keep ride height, the minute differences in steering will be unnoticeable for me on the street.Billy Johnson recommends 295/305 on the PS4S for GT350 owners. "295/305 PS$S (with its 11.1"/11.5" tread widths) is a better fitment for steering response and handling than the 305/325 (11.5"/12.2" trad width)"
Good point! There is .2, front and a .3 rear less in diameter.When I go to get another set, no way will I run 295/30 series tires up front... don't need the car any lower up there than it is already! Will run a 305 up front primarily to keep ride height, the minute differences in steering will be unnoticeable for me on the street.
I do agree with the assessment on width though in regards to maintaining steering feel and precision.
The 325's I just put on have 12.1" up front and back, and honestly while I do notice a difference as outlined above, I think more of it is due to major difference in tire compound/tread design rather than slop in the tire sidewall. Don't look bad at all in person either! If only I could upload pics :(
So the car will sit 0.1" lower in the front and 0.15" lower in the rear. Damn, that should make it bottom out everywhere! :lol:Good point! There is .2, front and a .3 rear less in diameter.
????? .20 is a little less than quarter inch and .30 is more than quarter inchSo the car will sit 0.1" lower in the front and 0.15" lower in the rear. Damn, that should make it bottom out everywhere! :lol:
..you could make the argument (and easily do that math to verify) that the 0.05" less rake in the car could actually give you more splitter clearance despite sitting 0.1" lower in the front.
J_Maher_AMG raised his front ride height 0.2" from a stock R by going with the 325/30 front tire. That will be the most clearance you can get short of going to a 295/35 front.
Did somebody flunk middle-school geometry class?????? .20 is a little less than quarter inch and .30 is more than quarter inch
Good article. I noticed my wider track wheels have worse initial turn in..This article explains the effects of a wide tire on narrow wheel and vice versa. Makes sense why Ford sized the wheels and bespoke PSS & PSC2 the way they did, to maximize the response, feeling, and performance of the tire:
http://www.motoiq.com/MagazineArtic...LY-select-and-size-TIRES-for-PERFORMANCE.aspx
DuH!!! Long day lolDid somebody flunk middle-school geometry class?
d=2r or r=0.5d
Good point! There is .2, front and a .3 rear less in diameter.
You guys can be sarcastic all you like, the bottom of my splitter has already taken a beating, and I've no intention of lowering it 0.00000001" lower than it came to increase steering feel or precision by an insignificant margin when considering the useage of the vehicle.So the car will sit 0.1" lower in the front and 0.15" lower in the rear. Damn, that should make it bottom out everywhere! :lol:
..you could make the argument (and easily do that math to verify) that the 0.05" less rake in the car could actually give you more splitter clearance despite sitting 0.1" lower in the front.
J_Maher_AMG raised his front ride height 0.2" from a stock R by going with the 325/30 front tire. That will be the most clearance you can get short of going to a 295/35 front.