Sponsored

NEW SYNC 3.0 Build 20204 Nav Android Auto/Apple Carplay

TexasRebel

Gearshifter
Joined
Mar 19, 2016
Threads
27
Messages
2,500
Reaction score
836
Location
between the mustard and the mayo
Vehicle(s)
2016 YZ GTPP - PP2
So I've scrolled through tons of posts but can't seem to find anyone who successfully installed the update through the link with the "Official Ford (leszek)" NON-Nav file. Download is 2.32 GB (vs 1.7GB for the Official Ford W/NAV) but no "2 part install" from what I can tell in my file. I have the "autoinstall.lst" along with 6 "tar.gz" files so 7 files total unzipped. "Official Ford" seems more legit and the other mirror files won't unzip (on a macbook pro with no access to windows PC at the moment). Anyone with any advice or can confirm the official ford file works as a single update install or is there a workaround with it that I missed? Thanks!
I couldn't get the non-nav from the Ford link to install either. However, I unzipped the Ford linked .zip file and gathered the MD5 hash values for each of the tarball files. I compared them to the MD5 hash values of the tarball files from one of the 2-part leaks and they were identical. Which means they are the same files. The only differences are the autoinstall.lst files which do nothing more than provide a script for the system updater to follow. You can do the same with the SHA256 hash if you're more worried about security than corruption.

SHA256 checksums from the Ford link should be:

For NAV:
GB5T-14G386-AA.tar.gz = 2c 35 bc d5 44 ec ab d0 6e 7b e5 67 b1 46 14 ee 24 a9 ef ff 5f ed 1c 84 22 cd f6 3d 57 96 02 c1
HB5T-14G386-TCB.tar.gz = 39 74 ba 75 48 a3 b2 fb 1e 19 19 32 5c 40 f2 1f 59 e0 65 0a 18 c3 a8 af c5 5f f0 40 02 26 0b ad
HN1T-14G381-LG.tar.gz = b5 6c 84 f0 96 e4 46 f2 1f 14 77 8f f8 63 5d 22 e8 b6 2b 32 e5 0f 62 11 c2 8c e8 48 f0 ee 2a 2f
HN1T-14G391-CC.tar.gz = 26 cd a3 8d b3 d9 94 d9 8f d2 3c c5 16 07 32 36 25 e1 cd 61 43 82 67 8d bb e3 1b a5 e7 d2 04 01
HN1T-14G423-CA.tar.gz = 2d 31 94 8f 12 7b a2 ec a1 cc af 56 81 36 e7 ab 17 81 05 b1 17 e2 e5 2f 96 56 c6 28 83 99 3f 0f

For Non-NAV:
GB5T-14G386-AA.tar.gz = 2c 35 bc d5 44 ec ab d0 6e 7b e5 67 b1 46 14 ee 24 a9 ef ff 5f ed 1c 84 22 cd f6 3d 57 96 02 c1
GB5T-14G386-SB.tar.gz = 31 3a d0 ad b9 d2 e0 74 ca bf d6 b9 d0 f3 d0 8c 87 87 6f 0a fb b1 44 c4 2d 09 6c 87 d4 b3 da 26
HB5T-14G386-TBB.tar.gz = ad 9f 6d 5d 79 bd e3 3b 03 a7 c4 8d f2 3c 13 eb 53 09 ca 8e 45 ac d0 0f 8d 91 f1 59 5e a0 61 7a
HN1T-14G381-LG.tar.gz = b5 6c 84 f0 96 e4 46 f2 1f 14 77 8f f8 63 5d 22 e8 b6 2b 32 e5 0f 62 11 c2 8c e8 48 f0 ee 2a 2f
HN1T-14G391-BC.tar.gz = df 7c 63 c5 a6 09 23 95 72 42 b6 e9 e8 a3 4f 08 47 35 65 d1 e6 69 e3 33 6f 14 52 32 aa 98 1e c5
HN1T-14G423-BA.tar.gz = 07 0e d7 36 19 57 8c 48 fe b1 4a 0a af 47 c3 74 a8 cf f8 f8 7e 05 f1 7b c6 70 41 c7 dc 6a 03 af

You can see from this, the NAV and Non-NAV updates share two files and the rest make the difference.

If you have the know-how, you can create your own two-part installation from the Ford link by editing the autoinstall.lst file.


@FordIVTeam has been showing up in other forums today (and even in a thread on mustang6g I think I saw). They've confirmed, in the FocusRS forum, that there is still no date for this to be officially released. ...which is surprising since you'd think they'd want to get a handle on this as it spreads like fire. The first wave were folks who could confidently manipulate the bits and Bytes and solve the hardware change... The second wave were people anxious to upgrade, but wanted evidence of success; maybe less technically experienced, and the third wave are beginning to be people who don't understand that Ford hasn't released this update yet, seem to have extremely limited technical experience, and don't always seem patient enough to wait for processing time. This isn't specific to any poster, or even any board for that matter, just the general vibe I've read over the various model lines (some of those f150 guys are stubborn cookies, and there's about four SuperDuty owners that even know what SYNC3 is :lol: ).
Sponsored

 
Last edited:

CodyGT

New Member
Joined
Jan 26, 2017
Threads
0
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Location
Jacksonville, FL
Vehicle(s)
'16 Mustang GT
No, I understand it's still not the "official" ford release but the equivalent release to the lincolns. As the "official" hardware isn't either.
I'm pretty tech saavy but yes, that's beyond my abilities. I can save your life in the ER but no ability to write/fiddle with coding and definitely not practicing now. I like my car on the road, not bricked lol
I simply downloaded another program ("the unarchiver" for macs in case anyone else has this same problem) that was able to unzip the original mirror file successfully and installing now according to the included readme.
Hardware already swapped with single port happily in my console :)
 

scott_0

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2016
Threads
19
Messages
1,115
Reaction score
277
Location
Oxford, Pennsylvania
Vehicle(s)
2016 Mustang GT
Hi guys,
Do you know if this update also works on NON-US models ?
I am thinking about my European friends there...
no, it does not
 

ajl50

New Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2016
Threads
0
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Location
Central NJ
First Name
Al
Vehicle(s)
2016 Mustang GT Premium PP
After reading this I noticed today that my reference lines are also gone. :/ I didn't really use them anyways but it was still nice to have...
For any of you guys that have done the update and lost the guide lines on your reverse camera... Have you tried using Forscan's "Local Interconnect Network New Module Calibration" option? Forscan's changelog shows this as:
"+ Service function "Local Interconnect Network New Module Calibration" (used e.g. for rear camera calibration)"

I haven't yet done the upgrade, but if I get a chance to do it today, I'll let you know what happens.
 

nappynick

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 24, 2015
Threads
4
Messages
52
Reaction score
11
Location
Arizona
First Name
Nick
Vehicle(s)
'16 Oxford White GT PP
I did the upgrade a few weeks ago. I didn't think to look for the reference lines but when I saw this brought up I went out and looked. Mine are there. That's odd that they disappear for some of you guys.
 

Sponsored

jacknifetoaswan

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 6, 2016
Threads
49
Messages
1,425
Reaction score
760
Location
Charleston, SC
Vehicle(s)
2016 Race Red Mustang GT Premium Performance Pack
I did the upgrade a few weeks ago. I didn't think to look for the reference lines but when I saw this brought up I went out and looked. Mine are there. That's odd that they disappear for some of you guys.
I have the NAV with no backup sensors, and the lines work perfectly on mine.

I wonder if there's a correlation between people with backup sensors having an issue, and people without backup sensors NOT having the issue.

JR
 

nappynick

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 24, 2015
Threads
4
Messages
52
Reaction score
11
Location
Arizona
First Name
Nick
Vehicle(s)
'16 Oxford White GT PP
Yea I don't have back up sensors either
 

Morty

Member
Joined
Jan 10, 2017
Threads
1
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Location
Canada
Vehicle(s)
2016 Ruby Red Mustang GT Premium w/ Perf Package
Did the update. Everything working fine.
Just checked the backup camera. I have lines and sensor tone.
And to screw things up my car DOES have NAV.
 

scott_0

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2016
Threads
19
Messages
1,115
Reaction score
277
Location
Oxford, Pennsylvania
Vehicle(s)
2016 Mustang GT
it seems totally random if you lose the lines or not, as I posted before, I have a Nav car and still have them after I updated
 

Sponsored

scott_0

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2016
Threads
19
Messages
1,115
Reaction score
277
Location
Oxford, Pennsylvania
Vehicle(s)
2016 Mustang GT

paulrkiii

Active Member
Joined
May 21, 2016
Threads
0
Messages
28
Reaction score
5
Location
Warner Robins, Ga
First Name
Paul
Vehicle(s)
16 Mustang GT premium
I wonder if there's a correlation between people with backup sensors having an issue, and people without backup sensors NOT having the issue.
Nope, I have the sensors and never lost my backup lines.
 

scott_0

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2016
Threads
19
Messages
1,115
Reaction score
277
Location
Oxford, Pennsylvania
Vehicle(s)
2016 Mustang GT
I have the NAV with no backup sensors, and the lines work perfectly on mine.

I wonder if there's a correlation between people with backup sensors having an issue, and people without backup sensors NOT having the issue.

JR
there is no correlation, I have back up sensors and nav, both guidelines work........
Sponsored

 
 




Top