Brn N Rubr
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2015
- Threads
- 7
- Messages
- 122
- Reaction score
- 63
- Location
- Burleon, TX
- Vehicle(s)
- 2015 CO GT PP
- Thread starter
- #16
I understand your point of view. Logs were very similar between the low dyno and theirs with the exception of knock retard (ie expected MAF accounts, hertz, load, timing, fuel trims, etc). No tune changes were made when I loaded it on their dyno yesterday. Literally straight off the highway and on to the rollers.Trust but verify is what I believe in. Im glad you're happy and the car runs well but I would personally put it in the dyno you were seeing mid 500s one last time to see what it does.
I'm confindent, regardless of which dyno, with a cool down and removing the lid the numbers would have been higher. But, what good are glory numbers except to impress people on the internet? I'd rather see low numbers and beat higher power cars vice the other way around.
Sponsored