40ishOn a GT, what type of rwhp gains are to be expected out of a Lund tune with a CAI and catback?
I couldn't find one, but feel free to point me to an existing thread.
Thanks.
25-30 RWHP from a tune alone?A catback will have zero gains, a CAI very minimal. Expect 25 -30 on the tune.
What would be a reasonable number to expect for a exhaust, tune , and CAI?25-30 RWHP from a tune alone?
And [MENTION=17023]Akwarreng[/MENTION]- "about 40"
Seeing that the cat back adds nothing, and as you said the CAI (which is mostly sucking in hot air)- what tune are you guys running that you are seeing these kinds of numbers? Not being argumentative, but that sounds rather excessive.
Thanks
Bama is the bottom of the barrel for tunes. Bama and better don't go together.Are some tunes better for manual and some better for auto?
Example - would Bama be better for manual and Lund better for auto?
Thanks
wut? Did you notice a different from driving there compared when leaving after the reflash?Had mine on the dyno a few months ago with PMAS CAI, Lund 93 Nguage and Solo Thunder. Went through two pulls and could only get 359hp out of the car and I was not a happy camper. I reloaded the tune and put down 401 on the next pull. Somehow the tune wasn't loaded and the PMAS wasnt throwing a code. Not sure what happened, but I got a before and after pull out of it.
It will place you around 400-410whp depending on fuel quality but remember you will need to rev that puppy.On a GT, what type of rwhp gains are to be expected out of a Lund tune with a CAI and catback?
I couldn't find one, but feel free to point me to an existing thread.
Thanks.
lol.Bama is the bottom of the barrel for tunes. Bama and better don't go together.
Bama is far from the bottom of the barrel.Bama is the bottom of the barrel for tunes. Bama and better don't go together.