Search results

That can not possibly be the way anyone reads theShrills post. He merely is incapable of accepting that the OLDER 1le is a better track car than the current GT. That the CURRENT SS is about half to a whole second faster in a quarter blast. Just deal with it. Instead he finds the most...

Bingo.

Yeah they are. Its called the 2016 GT PP. Silly goose.

I mean this in the least offensive way possible, but I mean we are comparing the new Stang to a car not produced anymore?

40k for possible high 11's. Without touching a thing. Please post vid of said 197 accomplishing said feats stock.

Can you PLEASE stop making this so easy. So what you are arguing is that the Base SS isnt an 11 sec car because most people cant do it, but the 350 is because no people have done it. Wait even better, is your argument that the SS needs air to get it, but the 350 is so impossible to launch...

If I KNEW anything about drag racing. Trap was the real tell? First, you realize you are arguing against your own earlier points. Trap speed us what the car is "capable" of. You stating this after you disclaim what an SS us capable of, reeks of hypocrisy. 2nd Racing is all the...

A base SS is more an 11 second car stock than is GT, GT PP, and even a 350.

LOL ok. You act as if the side rear view is any better in the Stang. Or as if the rear window has an oceans view more looking area. Belt line is high on the Camaro, but as I said before, wtf do you need to see directly beside you on the road as you are driving? I mean what are you doing...

Confident enough?????? Really? Make sure no one lets this nervous nelly drive their Lamborghini, Ferrari, or any other sports car that doesn't have Honda Accord visibility. lol.

Same that most of the world can't get a s550 to get under a 12.7. Funny how y'all use the fastest unverified bone stock mustang time of 12.5 as the standard for Mustangs though.

Same weight? You do realize thats a V6 chally and the older Camaro in your link right?

He cant do that, who would he puppy back off of then?

Pretty hypocritical of you..... I mean you do the same with Zane. As for theShrill. Still going on about weight of the Camaro, yet its still lost weight as compared to the Mustang where their engineers were claiming weight loss. Where is all the feigned outrage? Does someone have to post...

From the lot to the garage doesn't count. Figures mustang guy believes in theShrill. Lol, WHO WOULD OF EVER guessed that. He fits your narrative so nicely.

But I guess you will accept all the tests that show the true weight of the camaro as 3650 lbs then? Also all the tests and comparo tests that show the 16 ss as a far superior a performance car to the 16 gt with or without the "PP" Its the results. Hypocrite.

The fact that a thread started by this idiot gets as much attention as it does in here speaks volumes. Is this the only place left fir theShrill to post? Seems like it, most other places got rid of him or just ignore his ramblings.

Mustang guy logic?

I guess if you don't consider eterneties far apart. I mean the 350R beat the older Z by less than that or roundabouts. Did you consider it close? Should you also wait to see what your PP mustang does against its rival the 1LE? Or will you cry about the few grand difference.

No shit sherlock, but my original point was adressing a fool who was associating needing more cubes to get the power compared to a smaller displacement motor. As if having a SMALLER, MORE EFFICIENT (based on cubes compared to size) more powerful engine as compared to the modular 4.6 was a...