Science is now cancelled? [USERS NOW BANNED FOR POLITICS]

[CJJon]

2 hours since first Moderna vaccine shot. Feel normal. Disappointed at the lack of super powers. Got Tetanus re up in the other arm. Good thing I'm a side sleeper...

But are you magnetic?

Sponsored

 

[Sivi70980]

Give it time. The microchip will be fully functional soon and start the rest of the procedure.

I was telling people that's probably why second shot shows more effects. Mutation can be painful or fatigue the body. Kind of standard after something like this to once again try to move things with my mind, nearly, kill myself lifting heavy weight, and jump as high as I can to see if I still succumb to gravity.

 

[CJJon]

Give it time. The microchip will be fully functional soon and start the rest of the procedure.

^This!

The "Booster-Shots" will actually be the instructions to activate the chips. It's all a China plot...we will be turned into thoughtless automatons to mass-produce all the junky goods they are going to need when they take over the world economy.

The tables have turned!

 

[Sivi70980]

But are you magnetic?

Not sure, was going to try to scan my arm when I get home from work today.

 

[Sivi70980]

^This!

The "Booster-Shots" will actually be the instructions to activate the chips. It's all a China plot...we will be turned into thoughtless automatons to mass-produce all the junky goods they are going to need when they take over the world economy.

The tables have turned!

I'm sticking with Space Locusts to dominate the cosmos.

 

[CJJon]

Not sure, was going to try to scan my arm when I get home from work today.

Don't head out this way, you will set off the radiation alarms at the shipyard - probably.

 

[CJJon]

I'm sticking with Space Locusts to dominate the cosmos.

I don't know about locusts, but I ate some chili-lime crickets once and they were damned good!

 

[shogun32]

I was telling people that's probably why second shot shows more effects.

several papers from around Feb already did the serological studies and that Antibody expression after 1 shot was near nil. It was only after the 2nd shot that it was notable.

 

[Sivi70980]

Don't head out this way, you will set off the radiation alarms at the shipyard - probably.

Hopefully Sync will continue to function normally. I do have a light headache but just starting intermittent fasting again so normal. Breaking fast in 3 minutes!

 

[CJJon]

Hello; This is why I post the link address so folks can check it out for themselves. You seem to know more about him and the organization than I do.
So far two posts about the source but nothing about the content. Guess I can figure you will not consider anything of the content to have merit.
I questioned one bit of content myself in writing.

What would you do if a student wrote a paper about how global warming is a hoax and they used that site and that person as a reference to support their claims? Would they get a passing grade? Is that how you would teach them to "do science"?

I think this is the crux of the issue with you...

Unless this is another of your attempts at a trap. Whatever happened to the poor beta fish?

 

[Sivi70980]

several papers from around Feb already did the serological studies and that Antibody expression after 1 shot was near nil. It was only after the 2nd shot that it was notable.

Nurse said I was good to go but to keep taking all the precautions blah blah blah. Shot 2 schedule for the 31st.

 

[CJJon]

If this drug shows any ability to cut serous illness down why not prescribe it?

Then I will agree with prescribing it.

 

[CJJon]

From study in story.

Moderate-certainty evidence finds that large reductions in COVID-19 deaths are possible using ivermectin. Using ivermectin early in the clinical course may reduce numbers progressing to severe disease. The apparent safety and low cost suggest that ivermectin is likely to have a significant impact on the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic globally.

https://journals.lww.com/americanth...mectin_for_prevention_and_treatment_of.7.aspx

Bryant, Andrew MSc1,*; Lawrie, Theresa A. MBBCh, PhD2; Dowswell, Therese PhD2; Fordham, Edmund J. PhD2; Mitchell, Scott MBChB, MRCS3; Hill, Sarah R. PhD1; Tham, Tony C. MD, FRCP4
Stupid doctors.

But look at the details - Poor evidence except for one category.

Also, look where all these studies were conducted. Pakistan, Iran, Columbia, Lebanon, etc.

Table 2. - Summary of findings table of ivermectin versus no ivermectin for COVID-19 treatment in any setting.

Outcomes	Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI)	Relative effect (95% CI)	No. of participants (studies)	Quality of the evidence (GRADE)
Assumed risk	Corresponding risk
No ivermectin	Ivermectin
Death from any cause	78 per 1000 (all disease severity)	48 fewer deaths per 1000 (21–63)	RR = 0.38 (0.19–0.73)	2438 (15)	Moderate†
Recovery time to negative PCR test, in days	Absolute risks were not computed due to certainty of evidence being low and, in some cases, number of events being sparse	MD = −3.20 (−5.99 to −0.40)	375 (6)	Very low†,‡,§
Time to clinical recovery, in days (outpatients)	MD = −1.06 (−1.63 to −0.49)	176 (2)	Very low†,‡,§
Time to clinical recovery, in days (mild to moderate COVID-19 inpatients)	MD = −7.32 (−9.25 to −5.39)	96 (1)	Very low†,¶
Time to clinical recovery, in days (severe COVID-19 inpatients)	MD = −3.98 (−10.06 to 2.10)	33 (1)	Very low†,¶
Admission to ICU	RR=1.22 (0.75–2.00)	379 (2)	Very low¶,║¦
Need for mechanical ventilation	RR=0.66 (0.14–3.00)	431 (3)	Low§,║
Length of hospital stay, in days	MD= 0.13 (−2.04 to 2.30)	68 (1)	Very low†,¶
Admission to hospital	RR 0.16 (0.02–1.32)	194 (2)	Very low†,¶
Duration of mechanical ventilation	Not reported
Improvement (mild to moderate COVID-19)*	635 improved per 1000	159 more per 1000 (from 51 more to 286 more)	RR 1.25 (1.08–1.45)	681 (5)	Low†,‡
Deterioration (any disease severity)	143 per 1000	93 fewer per 1000 (from 50 fewer to 116 fewer)	RR 0.35 (0.19–0.65)	1587 (7)	Low†,‡
Serious adverse events	7/867 (0.8%) had an SAE in ivermectin group and 2/666 (0.3%) in control	RR=1.65 (0.44–6.09)	1533 (11)	Low†,‡

 

[shogun32]

If this drug shows any ability to cut serous illness down why not prescribe it?

it shows 70% reduction of symptoms. There are LOTS of RCTs out there and a zillion people using it actively. But they are all 3rd-world sh*tholes and full of poor people so their medicine is provably inferior to us in the G7.

just some light reading:
https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct/search?submit=Search&term=IVERMECTIN
https://covid19criticalcare.com/wp-...tin_for_Prevention_and_Treatment_of.98040.pdf
https://covid19criticalcare.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/AndrewHill7-6-21paper.pdf
https://c19ivermectin.com/

 

[CJJon]

Has any information shown that it hurts the outcome in patients when prescribed correctly?

Also multiple reports. Lol. There were multiple reports or a lady screaming help in my neighborhood the other day. Turned out to be two cats fighting. Not hundreds of reports or thousands of reports.

From that particular article:

7/867 (0.8%) had an SAE in ivermectin group and 2/666 (0.3%) in control

Multiply the number by several millions.

Sponsored